Henry's armor 8. Armor of the polygamist king. The Chest Plate Mystery
Favorite armor of Henry VIII (1491-1547)
History has many secrets and mysteries, but, as a rule, time is the best assistant in solving them. Well, for example, quite recently, not only in school textbooks, but even in serious books, it was stated that knightly armor was so heavy that the warrior wearing it, having fallen, could no longer rise on his own, but today, having visited the Museum of Weapons in England In the city of Leeds, you can see how knights dressed in metal armor from the Tudor era not only fight each other with swords, but also jump in them, which seems completely incredible. However, there were even more perfect knightly armor that belonged to kings, and in particular to King Henry VIII.
Lover of military exercises
It is known that the English king Henry VIII(1491-1547) was a great fan of military exercises. He was a master at shooting from a bow, played ball, hunted, but preferred all this jousting tournaments. In 1515, he invited German and Flemish gunsmiths, famous for their art, to come to England and settled them in the town of Greenwich near London. This is how the Greenwich armory, which eventually became world famous, was born, specializing in armor for the king himself and his entourage.
The king ordered the first armor to craftsmen in the same 1515, and they were intended for foot soldiers. tournament fights. Their assembled height reaches 185 centimeters and weighs 30.11 kilograms, which once again proves: all the stories that Henry was a prominent man are by no means fiction!
Armor These used to be gilded, today they are covered with silver and also decorated with elegant engraving. Interestingly, the theme of the decoration of this armor is the wedding of Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon, which took place in 1509. The figure of St. George is depicted on the chest of the cuirass, and on the back - St. Barbara. All other parts are decorated with a pattern of climbing plants, among which Tudor roses and Aragonese pomegranates are visible. The wings of the knee pads are decorated with bunches of arrows - the emblem of Ferdinand II of Aragon and the emblem of Catherine of Aragon - a rose and a pomegranate, the socks - the emblem of the fortress of Castile and the gate bars - the emblem of the Tudors. At the hem of the skirt armor- golden initials of Henry and Katerina: “N” and “K”.
Since it is not proper for a king to walk on foot, in front and behind skirts Cutouts were made, thanks to which the king in this armor could sit astride a horse like a glove. During the fight, the cutouts were covered with removable parts attached to the skirt, and it became like a bell. This design did not interfere with moving around the lists, and at the same time, the blow below the belt did not reach the target!
"Steel Spacesuit"
Next armor Henry VIII, ordered by him in 1520, cannot be called anything other than a “steel suit”. They did not leave a single piece of the body not protected by metal. Moreover, since this armor was also intended for combat on foot, even the seat of the great monarch and the inner surface of the thighs were reliably protected. They were made by master Martin Van Rijn, and they have also survived to this day. This armor is not decorated with anything, but it is the most perfect in design and execution - a statue made of steel! Their weight had already reached 42.64 kilograms, and their height was 187.9 centimeters.
This armor was already studied in our time by specialists from NASA and were very surprised at how accurately the ancient craftsmen were able to fit it to the king’s figure - they practically did not limit his movements!
The Chest Plate Mystery
Since solid armor was very expensive (some cost as much as a small town!), under Henry it became fashionable to order so-called armor sets for yourself. It was armor with several additional details, thanks to which the knight's protection was transformed depending on the need. This was also the famous armor set of the king produced in 1540, which made it possible to have as many as six on the basis of one armor! Firstly, it was full knightly armor, so to speak, for any occasion, a replacement helmet, leggings and legguards, these armor easily turned into the armor of a spear rider, and through even greater lightening - into the armor of a light cavalry rider. In addition, it was also full tournament armor for spear fighting, reinforced armor, with massive plates on the left arm, part of the chest and helmet, as well as full tournament armor for foot combat!
It is interesting that in this armor, under the cuirass, a special chest plate was also worn, consisting of three elements. In the center of the plate there was a screw, with which it was connected to the chest cuirass through a hole on it. In addition to enhancing the protective function of the armor, this plate, as it turned out, played another role, namely, it helped distribute the weight of the entire armor evenly over the shoulders and chest! Such plates were not found on other armor, and this once again tells us that Henry VIII was not just strong, but also an intelligent monarch, capable of all kinds of technical tricks! However, the most original armor of Henry VIII has not reached us. Only one helmet has survived from them, decorated for some reason... with glasses and huge twisted ram horns!
It was a gift, and a truly royal gift, since there was no benefit from it, since such a helmet could hardly be worn in a real battle! It is believed that the so-called ram helmet was made by the master Konrad Seisenhofer in Innsbruck in 1511-1514, and it was presented to Henry by Emperor Maximilian I, exactly the same as the king, a lover of tournaments and a connoisseur of armor!
Royal sprinkler
By the way, the fact that King Henry was very fond of all sorts of military wonders is evidenced by his “walking tour” that has survived to this day. club.
It was a spiked ball on a wooden handle, inside of which were short pistol barrels with ignition holes, closed with special sliding covers. Legend has it that, armed with such a club, also called the royal sprinkler, the king loved to walk around London incognito. Once for wearing inappropriate weapons he was even detained by a night patrol and taken to the Tower. When the next morning the misunderstanding was cleared up, and the patrol leader was already mentally saying goodbye to life, the king summoned him to his place and even rewarded him for his zeal, since “ the law is the same for everyone"! Well, we can admire the wonderful armor of Henry VIII in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in the USA and in the Royal Arms Museum in Leeds. Moreover, the famous ram helmet is almost his calling card today!
Knight's helmet covered with a mask (1515), the work is attributed to the German gunsmith Kolman Helmschmid (German, Augsburg 1471–1532):
1. Charles V Habsburg (February 24, 1500, Ghent, Flanders - September 21, 1558, Yuste, Extremadura) - King of Spain (Castile and Aragon) under the name Carlos I (Spanish Carlos I) from January 23, 1516, King of Germany (Roman king) from June 28, 1519 (crowned in Aachen on October 23, 1520) to 1556, Holy Roman Emperor from 1519 (crowned on February 24, 1530 in Bologna by Pope Clement VII). The largest statesman in Europe in the first half of the 16th century, who made the greatest contribution to history among the rulers of that time. Charles V is the last emperor to be officially crowned by the Pope, and he is also the last emperor to celebrate a triumph in Rome.
The following knight's helmets belong to the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V of Habsburg: 
2. Maximilian II (German: Maximilian II, July 31, 1527, Vienna - October 12, 1576, Regensburg) - Holy Roman Emperor and Archduke of Austria from July 25, 1564 until his death, King of the Czech Republic (crowned May 14, 1562 under the name Maximilian I), King of Germany (Roman King, crowned November 28, 1562), King of Hungary and Croatia (crowned September 8, 1563). Representative of the Habsburg dynasty.
Helmet belonging to the Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian II, 1557. located in the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna:
3. Louis II or Louis II, also Lajos II (July 1, 1506, Buda, Hungary - August 29, 1526, Mohács, Hungary) - the last king of the Czech Republic and Hungary (from 1516) from the Jagiellonian dynasty. Killed in the Battle of Mohacs.
Knight's helmet of King Louis II of Hungary and Bohemia:
4. Henry VIII Tudor (June 28, 1491, Greenwich - January 28, 1547, London) - King of England from April 22, 1509, son and heir of King Henry VII of England, second English monarch from the Tudor dynasty. With the consent of the Roman catholic church, the English kings were also called “Lords of Ireland,” but in 1541, at the request of Henry VIII, who was excommunicated from the Catholic Church, the Irish parliament gave him the title “King of Ireland.”
The helmet known as the Horned Helmet belongs to Henry VIII:
5. Charles I (November 19, 1600 - January 30, 1649, London) - King of England, Scotland and Ireland from March 27, 1625. From the Stuart dynasty. His absolutist policies and church reforms sparked revolts in Scotland and Ireland and the English Revolution. During the civil wars, Charles I was defeated, tried by Parliament and executed on January 30, 1649 in London.
Gilded helmet of King Charles I of England, which could easily have been used in the English Civil War of 1642-1651:
In addition to the above, as a small bonus, I suggest you just take a look at the knightly combat and tournament means of protecting a warrior’s head from damage from the 7th to the 17th centuries, which are huddled in the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art.
As can be seen from the variety of European headdresses, the design of the helmet varies greatly in its shape, and the surface can be either open or closed, solidly forged, cast or assembled from several parts (riveted or soldered).
The helmet itself can be made of iron, steel, bronze, copper or other material. Can be supplemented with protective elements, such as: ears, nasal guard, back cover, aventail, brim, visor, mask, visor, half mask.
C The reign of Henry the Eighth, the second Tudor king, was one of the longest and best documented in English history. Everyone knows the events of his personal life, which would have been more than enough for three men, not one: six wives, two of whom he executed, divorced one, and abandoned the other, declaring the marriage invalid. Brief biography some of his wives could be summed up in one line:
Divorced, Beheaded, Died; Divorced, executed, died
Divorced, Beheaded, Survived. Divorced, executed, survived..
Next, there is confusion with children, who is illegitimate and who is not. In order to gain freedom in his personal life, he broke with the pope, who did not approve of divorce, and became the evil Pinocchio’s own head of the church, simultaneously executing everyone who did not have time to adapt.
Despite the fact that the TV series “The Tudors” and also the film “The Other Boleyn Girl” portray King Henry as a muscular, handsome brunette, in reality he, of course, was not one. Or was it?
At the age of sixteen they wrote about him: “A talented rider and knight, he is popular among his associates for his ease of handling.” When Henry the Eighth turned fifty, it was said of him: “He was old before his age...he was often quick-tempered, easily angered, and increasingly succumbing to black depression as the years passed.”
It is interesting to trace the changes in the king’s appearance, which reflected not only the natural passage of time, but also the events that happened to him.
So, on June 28, 1491, King Henry the Seventh and his wife Elizabeth of York had a second son, who was named after his father.
I think it was an angel with golden curls and light eyes. True, the child was extremely spoiled, he even had his own whipping boy, who was punished for the little prince’s hooliganism.
Prince Henry grew up to be a well-educated and well-read man, fluent in French and Latin and Spanish, well versed in mathematics, heraldry, astronomy and music, and interested in science and medicine. He was a true man of the Renaissance - he loved art, poetry, painting, and at the same time, he was sincerely pious.
Importantly, academic knowledge did not prevent him from becoming a tall, handsome, well-built athlete and a passionate hunter; By the way, I loved...tennis. However, the lack of discipline in education, unbridled character, reluctance to study what is not interesting, traits that are forgivable for the second son of the king, later brought him and England many problems during his reign.
The Venetian envoy wrote about the young prince that he was the most handsome of the monarchs he had taken away, above average height, with slender and beautifully shaped legs, with very fair skin, with bright, reddish-brown hair, cut short in the French fashion; the round face was so beautiful that it would have suited a woman; his neck was long and strong.
The fact that the prince was well built is confirmed by the size of his youthful armor: 32 inches at the waist and 39 inches at the chest (81 cm and 99 cm). His height was and remained 6 feet 1 inch, which is equal to about 183 cm, if I’m not mistaken, with a weight of 95 kg. He also had good health: in his youth he only had a mild case of smallpox, and periodically suffered, also in a mild form, from malaria, which was common in Europe at that time (there were many swamps that have now been drained).
Portrait of 18-year-old Henry (where, in my opinion, he somehow looks an awful lot like his great-uncle, Richard III).
And this is young Prince Hal through the eyes of a modern artist.
Armor of young Henry (left) and armor of Henry in his 40s (right)
Henry in 1521 (age 30)
Portrait of Henry aged 34-36 Age 36-38
In the eyes of his subjects, the young king, who ascended the throne after his miserly father, who sent his last surviving relatives after the Battle of Bosworth to the scaffold or into exile, who had not convened parliament for ten years, was the personification of a new wonderful hero. “If a lion knew his strength, it is unlikely that anyone would be able to cope with him,” Thomas More wrote about him.
His reign proceeded more or less smoothly until the king reached the age of 44.
Henry at the age of 40: the prime of his life
By this time, the king had already divorced Catherine of Aragon and married the clever Anne Boleyn, but the turbulent events did not particularly affect his health: until 1536 he had no problems with it, except for a gradual increase in weight. Judging by the very detailed ordinance he personally drew up regarding the royal table, the king had what is called a brutal appetite for meat, pastries and wine. Hence the fullness that is already present in the portrait at the age of 40, which is not present in the portrait of 30-year-old Henry (see above). Yes, the king was a womanizer and a glutton, but he had not yet become Bluebeard and a tyrant.
What happened in January 1536 at the tournament in Greenwich? Already quite obese, Henry could not stay in the saddle and fell in armor from his horse, which also wore armor. The horse then fell on top of him. The king was unconscious for two hours, his legs were crushed and most likely suffered from several fractures. There was justifiable fear for his health, so much so that Queen Anne suffered a miscarriage: unfortunately, it was a boy. As if this were not enough, the king's illegitimate son, the young Duke of Richmond, soon died, and Anne was soon accused of adultery.
The fractures and other wounds healed at first, but soon the king began to suffer not only from headaches, but also from chronic, extensive, wet, purulent ulcers on his legs. Because of the pain, he could not speak and was silent for ten days in a row, suppressing a torn cry. Doctors tried unsuccessfully to heal these ulcers by piercing them with a hot iron, or excising them without allowing them to heal in order to “help the infection come out along with the pus.” Also, most likely, the king had been suffering from diabetes for a long time by this time (hence the incurability of ulcers). Is it any wonder that physical suffering, coupled with the consequences of a head injury, completely changed the character of the monarch?
Now researchers claim that as a result of an injury at a tournament in 1536, Henry the Eighth suffered damage to the frontal lobes of the brain, which are responsible for self-control, perception of signals from the external environment, social and sexual behavior. In 1524, when he was 33 years old, he also suffered a minor injury when he forgot to lower his visor and the tip of an enemy's spear hit him hard above his right eye. This gave him recurring severe migraines. But in those days they did not know how to treat brain injuries, as well as diabetes.
Those around him knew about the king's health, but everyone who dared to open their mouth was accused of treason and sent to the scaffold. Henry could give an order in the morning, cancel it by lunchtime, and then be furious when he learns that it has already been carried out.
From that moment on, a new, dark stage of the reign began.
The king's most passionate desire at this point was to obtain an heir to continue the Tudor dynasty. Multiplied by the serious psychological changes that occurred to him after 1536, this desire resulted in a series of impulsive and cruel actions for which Henry is famous to this day. It is more than likely that the king suffered by that time from a lack of potency. Even the actual fulfillment of his dream with the birth of his son from Jane Seymour, Edward, could not change anything.
Heinrich is about 49 years old
Henry VIII and the guilds of barbers and surgeons (the king was very interested in medicine, and these guilds were created under his patronage). The king is 49 years old on the canvas.
Detail of a 1545 portrait showing Henry, Edward and - posthumously - Jane Seymour.
And this is the entire portrait, on the left and on the right - the king’s two daughters.
Despite his painful condition, his spirit was stronger than his body, and Henry lived for another eleven years. Ignoring doctors' prohibitions, he traveled a lot, continuing his active foreign policy, hunted and... ate much more. The makers of a History Channel documentary recreated his diet based on surviving sources: the king consumed up to 13 meals daily, consisting mainly of lamb, chicken, beef, venison, rabbit and a variety of feathered birds like pheasant and swan, he could drink 10 pints (1 pint = 0.57 l) of ale a day, as well as wine. Although, on the other hand, it is also possible that this was only the king’s menu, offered to him by the cooks, and by no means what he actually ate. But...
With the impossibility of his previous mobility, he quickly gained weight and by the age of fifty he weighed...177 kilograms! Judging again by the armor, his waist from 81 cm in girth at the age of 20 grew to 132 cm at the age of about 50. By the end of his life, he could barely walk on his own. The condition of the ulcers on his legs only worsened, they emitted such a strong smell that he announced the approach of the king long before he appeared in the room. Katherine Parr, whom he married in 1543, was more of a nurse than a wife for him, only she could calm the monarch's fits of rage. He died in 1547, exhausted by attacks of fever and regular cauterization of ulcers.
In fact, judging by the armor of the end of his reign, the width of the king's torso was almost equal to his height!
The entire variety of existing portraits of Henry the Eighth is posted on this wonderful resource:
And here in English you can watch the documentary film "Inside the Body of Henry the Eighth"
Blacksmiths and jewelers in Europe made the first gold armor at the end of the 15th century, at the end of the Middle Ages.
In those days, producing armor from pure gold was not practical and very expensive. Knight's armor was made of iron and plated with gold. For what? Firstly, it indicated the wealth of the owner. Secondly, the main military leader in precious armor stood out on the battlefield, which inspired ordinary knights. Thirdly, the gold armor did not rust, which means it did not depreciate.
Nobles in precious armor appeared at tournaments, which were then fashionable entertainment. Since then, gold armor has acquired the name “tournament” or “ceremonial”.
We talk about the precious equipment of famous kings.
Armor of Henry VIII, King of England
Where you can see:
Value: priceless museum exhibit.
Material: steel, gold.
Manufactured : in 1527, in England.
Height: 185.4 cm.
Weight : 28.45 kg.
In the photo: The complex, delicate engraving pattern on the armor of the English king covers the armor from top to bottom..
Story:
King Henry VIII Tudor of England, when he was young, loved duels, established knightly tournaments and participated in them. In 1514, he founded an armor-making workshop in Greenwich, which later became famous throughout the world.
In the 15th century, kings used two sets of armor - one for tournaments, the other for battles. In the 16th century, the masters of Henry VIII first combined gold armor into one set. Gunsmiths applied the transformer principle, when one part of the armor was easily replaced by another. The cost of manufacturing royal armor has decreased, and the armor has gained versatility.
The great German painter Hans Holbein the Younger, who worked in the mid-16th century at the court of the English monarch, created sketches of the gold engraving that decorated the royal armor.
Experts called this armor "the most exquisite battle dress in the world."
Interesting fact:
Golden protection could not protect the royal from injury. In 1536, during a knight's duel, Henry's horse threw him and fell on him. The king lost consciousness for two hours. After this incident, the monarch's behavior changed radically. Biographers believe that Henry VIII developed depressive character traits.
Armor of King Henry II of France Valois
Where you can see: Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
Value: not installed.
Material: steel, silver, gold.
Manufactured: in 1555 in Paris.
Height: 187.96 cm.
Weight: 24.20 kg.
In the photo: The royal armor is decorated with chasing in the style of Italian grotesque, inlaid with silver and gold.
Story:
The ceremonial armor of King Henry II of France was made specifically for ceremonies. Artist Etienne Delon drew the initial sketches, and Jean Helder and Baptiste Pellerin completed the work. The figures on the armor symbolize the king's military victories and outstanding talents - intelligence and eloquence.
Interesting fact:
Nostradamus predicted the death of Henry II:
"The young lion will surpass the old one,
On the battlefield in single combat,
Striking his eyes in a golden cage,
Which will lead the old lion to a painful death."
Henry II fought with the Earl of Montgomery at a tournament in 1559, organized in honor of his daughter’s marriage. The enemy smashed his spear on the monarch's shell and damaged Henry's eye. Ten days later, the king died, and Nostradamus, who repeatedly warned the sovereign about the danger, became famous throughout the world.
Armor of the Swedish king Eric XIV
Where you can see: Armory Chamber, Dresden, Germany.
Value: valuable museum exhibit.
Manufactured: in 1565 in Belgium.
Material: steel, gold.
Weight: 20.7 kg.
In the photo: A complete set of precious armor of the King of Sweden and his horse. The armor is inlaid with gold and decorated with chasing.
Story:
In 1562, the Swedish monarch Eric XIV ordered an armor of unprecedented luxury to appear before the Queen of England with a marriage proposal. Jeweler Liberts worked on the gold armor for two years and invited French artists to make the designs.
The chased panels on the knight's armor illustrate the Trojan War, and the medallions on the horse's armor illustrate the labors of Hercules.
The precious armor, nicknamed the “Armor of Hercules,” was never used for its intended purpose. The reason is that the Danish king captured a gold set on his way from the Antwerp workshop to Sweden. Eric XVI never received ceremonial armor and did not marry Elizabeth I.
Interesting fact:
The Saxon Elector Christian II paid 8,800 guilders (more than one hundred kilograms of silver) for the “Armor of Hercules”.
During the Middle Ages, European rulers sought to decorate their armor and weapons with gold to demonstrate high royal status in reception halls and on the battlefield.
1984. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj (access date:
See: History of European Integration... P. 20. URL: http://www.irbis.vkgu.kz (date of access: 05.08.11). See: Pinder J. Altiero Spinelli’s European Federal Odyssey. 2007. P. 9. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu (access date: 08/13/11).
See: Resolution de l'Union des federalistes europeens concernant l'initiative Genscher-Colombo. 1983. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj (access date: 08/13/11).
See: Statement by Altiero Spinelli to the European Parliament. 1982. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj (access date: 08/13/11).
Informal meetings of European politicians - supporters of the federalist approach and strengthening the role of
European Parliament, which were held in the Crocodile restaurant.
22 See: Pinder J. Op. cit. P. 12.
23 See: Draft Treaty establishing the European Union. 1984. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj (access date: 08/10/11).
25 See: “Altiero Spinelli, ‘prophete’ de l’europeisme, croit prochaine l’unite politique de l’Europe” dans El Pa^s. 1984.
27 See: Aide-memoire sur la procedure a suivre pour la convocation de la Conference Intergouvernementale charge de rediger le Traite d’Union europeene. 1984. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu (access date:
UDC 94(9)”375/1492”
MODERN BRITISH HISTORIOGRAPHY ABOUT THE KNIGHT ARMOR OF THE ERA OF HENRY VIII
V. O. Shpakovsky
Penza state university Email: [email protected]
The article is devoted to the views of British historians on the development of defensive and offensive weapons in England and Scotland during the reign of King Henry VIII.
Keywords: knighthood, armor, knightly weapons, “ram” helmet, armor set, the era of Henry VIII.
Modern British Historiography about Knightly Armor of the Heinrich VIII’ Age
V. 0. Shpakovsky
The article discusses the development of the English arms and armor during the reign of Henry VIII. The research was done by the British scientists.
Key words: knighthood, arms and armour, knight’s armament, “mutton helmet”, armor suit, reign of Henry VIII.
First of all, it should be noted that the era of the reign of the English king Henry VIII (1497-1547) is characterized by the famous British historian Thomas Richardson1 as a curious period of combining the old with the new, at the same time the heyday and decline of white plate armor.
It was under Henry VIII that the English army was transformed from a medieval army consisting of cavalry, infantry and archers, to a "modern" army with firearms and long spears to fight cavalry. It is interesting that all these new weapons were in most cases imported to England from the mainland, where they were purchased from the most famous arms corporations. At the same time, he retained the traditional longbow in the arsenal of the British army and did everything possible to develop it in England
shooting sport, and did not allow his soldiers to shoot at targets located closer than 220 yards (approx. 200 m)2.
At the same time, he apparently considered national dependence on the import of foreign armor unacceptable, which is why he invited several Italian craftsmen to work in Southwark. However, for some unknown reason, this agreement fell through. Then, in 1515, Henry invited gunsmiths from Germany and Flanders, who were located in a weapons workshop in Greenwich.
The mixture of these two schools - Italian, whose influence in England apparently remained, and also German-Flemish - contributed to the beginning of the production of armor of the so-called Greenwich style3.
The main thing in the work of the royal workshops in Greenwich was that as a result, the king personally received a whole range of different types of armor for himself, most of which have survived to this day! In the Royal Arsenal in the Tower of London there are four personal armor of Henry III, one is kept in Windsor Castle, and two, also, according to experts, belonging to Henry VIII, are in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum in New York4.
The earliest of the armor of this series includes tournament armor for foot fights (especially loved by the king), made around 1515. In addition to the careful workmanship of all joints, it is distinguished by excellent finishing and is a real work of art. The decor of these armor, covered with engraving in silver, and even earlier gilded, is dedicated to the
© Shpakovsky V. O., 2012
the wedding of Henry and Catherine of Aragon in 1509. The breastplate depicts St. George, on the back of the cuirass - St. Varvara. Other details of the armor feature a pattern of climbing plants, including Tudor roses and Aragonese garnets. The wings of the knee pads are decorated with a bunch of arrows - the emblem of Catherine's father Ferdinand II of Aragon. On the toes of the sabatons there is a symbolic image of the fortress of Castile and another emblem of the Tudors - a lowering gate gate. The lower part of the armor's skirt is bordered by the intertwined initials of Henry and Catherine - "N" and "K". On the back of each greave is a female figure emerging from the calyx of a flower; On the collar of the figure of the left leggings the inscription “GLVCK” is visible.
By the way, it is this wonderful exhibit that allows us to draw a conclusion about the remarkable – even by today’s standards – growth and excellent physical fitness of the English monarch: the height of the “assembled” armor is 185 cm, and the weight is more than 30 kg.
Another armor - horse armor from 1510, presented to Henry VIII by Emperor Maximilian I in memory of joint military operations against the French - clearly shows what such armor was like at that time. The armor was made in Flanders by master Martin van Royan and consists of a headpiece, a collar, a breastplate, two sides and a massive mantle. The armor plates are decorated with engraving, chasing and gilding. In particular, the metal plates of the reins are engraved, while all large plates, as well as the front rear pommel of the saddle, are decorated with raised convex images of pomegranate branches and fruits, as well as branched crosses of the Order of the Golden Fleece, which Henry received in 1505. The least decorated was the neck plate of the armor , but it also had an engraved border depicting grenades. It is possible that this piece could have belonged to another piece of armor and was the work of the Flemish master Paul van Vrelant. Interestingly, both of these masters later ended up in England in the royal armory in Greenwich. Apparently, Henry chose for her the same craftsmen whom he knew from their work for Emperor Maximilian I in Flanders.
It is possible that the silvered and engraved armor of 1515 was made more by Italian than Flemish craftsmen, but it is equally possible that all its elements were made in Flanders. But it can almost be said with certainty that they were already decorated in England, where Henry VIII already had an armory in 15155.
Another remarkable example of armor art was the armor of Henry VIII, made in 1520 for a foot tournament duel on the so-called Field of the Cloth of Gold and, in its own way,
the designs are so perfect that with their weight of 42.68 kg, there is practically no part of the body that is not covered by solid forged steel6. True, despite all its technical perfection, this armor was never completed and it is in this form that it has survived to this day.
The armor had a huge bascinet, traditionally used in foot battles, originally made in Milan (the mark of the Missagli workshop is on the back of the helmet), but with a modified visor. Bracers were also assembled from existing parts of old armor and consisted of many narrow and thin articulated plates that protected the elbow joints from the inside, while the outside plates were large. Leggings with loops and straps had special grooves for spurs, which were necessary for the rider, but not at all necessary for foot armor. Only shoulder pads made of overlapping plates that became distinctive feature workshop in Greenwich, and the steel skirt (tonlet) was made anew for it. The engraved decorations still retain traces of gilding. The decoration included images of St. George, the Virgin Mary and Child, Tudor roses, the badge of the Order of the Garter on the collar, and the garter itself was engraved along the upper edge of the left greave7.
One of the most famous armor sets of Henry VIII was also made by the craftsmen of the Royal Arsenal in Greenwich in 1540. This set was full armor for the jostra: plate armor with a massive left shoulder pad, integral with the buff - an additional armor plate covering part of the helmet, chin, neck and part of the chest. For foot tournament combat, elongated leg guards were attached to them. The shoulder pads were symmetrical in shape, and the codpiece was all-metal. The set included details of full knightly tournament armor, full knightly field armor (the so-called “three-quarter length” dart armor - with legguards only up to the knees) and infantry half-armor with chainmail sleeves, plate gloves, plate legguards and again an all-metal codpiece, but , accordingly, without a hook on the cuirass, a visor on the helmet and any kind of plate shoes8.
In 1544, Henry ordered two more armor for the Boulogne campaign, which were decorated with engravings and carvings based on designs by Hans Holbein9.
A very interesting detail of the 1540 set was the belly plate, given to Henry VIII by the French king Francis I back in 1520. This unique detail became a characteristic feature of the armor of the Greenwich school and, except on the armor for Henry VIII, is not found anywhere else. It consists of three steel plates overlapping one another, riveted together, which were fastened with a special
radii on a quilted doublet, which had chain mail sleeves and short chain mail leggings with a codpiece. On the chest cuirass there was a small hole in the center of the chest through which a T-shaped pin passed, which fastened this abdominal plate to the cuirass10. Such a device made a certain sense, since since the 16th century. cuirasses began to be made in such a way that their front and back plates were now just two separate armor plates, and not four, as was the case before.
It is known that King Henry VIII was not only a great connoisseur and lover of weapons, but also closely followed all the new products that appeared in this area. Evidence of this is the original “shooting” shield, made in Italy in 1540. The steel-covered wooden product weighing about 5 kg and with a diameter of 48 cm in the central part is decorated with gilded engraving. And above the image of the scene of the exploit of the ancient Roman hero Mucius Scaevola sticks out... a built-in matchlock pistol with a removable breech, which has a rechargeable steel cartridge. The history of this “hybrid” may be connected with one of the inventions proposed to Henry by the Italian master Giovanni Battista from Ravenna in 1544. It is also possible that the shield was delivered to the country along with other examples of breech-loading weapons - again Italian.
In 1547, 35 such shields arrived at the Tower from Westminster, and today 16 such shields of two types are stored in the Royal Arsenal in the Tower: nine with a barrel in the center of the shield and seven with a barrel located higher. Six of the shields have a relief design on the plates covering them, while the others are smooth. Some had an observation hole above the barrel, covered with an iron grate11. For a long time, English historians could not decide where exactly such shields could be used. The controversy was put to an end by the recovery of the royal flagship ship Mary Rose, which sank in 1540 in the Portsmouth roadstead, where exactly the same shields were discovered among other finds. So now it is already known for sure that they were in service with ship crews12.
As for the ceremonial European armor, as a rule, they no longer had any real military significance, not to mention the fact that in their manufacture the master gunsmiths, pleasing their customers, completely ignored all common sense. This fully applies to the so-called horned helmet of Henry VIII, which, together with a set of armor, was presented to him by Emperor Maximilian I in 1514.
This helmet (the only thing that has survived to this day from the whole armor) has a visor that folds up with a human
face, imitation glasses and for some reason... dashingly curled ram horns! Made by the master Konrad Seusenhofer of Innsbruck in 1512, this helmet is undoubtedly an outstanding example of early 16th-century weaponry, but it was hardly very comfortable to fight in. Of course, the gunsmiths who worked on it could not help but realize this. But since it was just an original souvenir, a “royal gift,” they made it exactly the way it is.
As for the armor from this helmet, its remains were apparently sold for scrap in 1649, during the Civil War in England. The helmet avoided this fate, since it was stored separately from them (the armor obviously had other helmets) and already in the 17th century. was displayed at an exhibition in the Tower as part of the armor of Will Somers, the court jester of Henry VIII, and for a long time no one knew who it really belonged to.
Recently, serious scientific doubts have arisen about the authenticity of this helmet. For example, were the ram's horns and glasses truly part of him, or were they added later? But most importantly, why should such a bizarre object represent a gift from one monarch to another? These disputes are still not fully resolved, but the helmet is accepted by most experts as the only surviving piece of perhaps the finest knightly armor that ever existed in England13.
In the collection of the Royal Arsenal in the Tower there is a saddle sword (or estoc sword) with a handle in the form of a gun barrel. The top on it was removable, and the powder charge inside was ignited manually using a wick14. Now it is very difficult to say how it was used in battle and whether this weapon was ordered from one of the gunsmiths on the orders of Henry VIII himself, a well-known lover of all sorts of weapon curiosities. However, the very fact of the existence of a noble sword combined with the “weapon of the devil” suggests that Henry VIII had a positive attitude towards firearms and tested the most diverse and sometimes very extravagant examples of them. These include primarily a large mace, equipped at the end with three gun barrels and spikes, delivered from Westminster to the Tower in July 1547, along with 118 maces without barrels and 7 with barrels but without spikes. Each of the barrels in it was equipped with a sliding cover that covered the fuse, so that it was enough to hold this weapon, called with purely English humor, a sprinkler, under the armpit to fire three shots in succession, bringing a burning fuse to the barrels.
In the 17th century this mace began to be called the walking staff of Henry VIII, and by the 18th century. a story was invented that the king walked around the castle with her at night, checking the security of the Tower. In
During one of these walks, one of the constables allegedly did not recognize the king and sent him to a prison cell for carrying such a dangerous weapon at the wrong hour. Having learned in the morning who exactly he had arrested, the unfortunate constable was already saying goodbye to life, but Henry VIII not only did not punish him, but, on the contrary, rewarded him, noting his diligence and diligence15.
However, this should not be particularly surprising, because this is nothing more than a completely normal state approach to business, and not blind adherence to clearly obsolete, although for some, wonderful traditions. After all, even in 1482, the Milanese already had in their arsenal 1250 firearms and only 233 crossbows. Moreover, among this number, 352 were arquebuses that had a lock with a spring ignition mechanism16. At the time of Henry VIII's death in 1547, the Royal Arsenal contained 3,000 bows with 13,000 strings of arrows containing 24 arrows each. However, the total number of handguns reached 7,700 units17.
In 1543 alone, the English army received 4,000 arquebuses produced in the Italian city of Brescia and purchased by Henry VIII through the Venetian Republic.
Equally significant, by the way, was the British import of Italian armor. D. Edge and D. Paddock provide the following impressive figures on this matter: at the end of 1512, Henry VIII ordered 2,000 sets of light armor from Florence (at a price of 16 shillings each), and the next year another 5,000 pieces of armor from Milan. In connection with the threat of a French invasion in 1539, they ordered another 1,200 sets of armor in Colonie and 2,700 in Antwerp, on which, apparently, the monarch decided to save money, since they note that “it was the largest center in Europe for the production of low-quality armor.” ", used only in the infantry"18.
Thus, English historians immediately identify two circumstances: firstly, the widespread distribution in the first half of the 16th century. armor in the English infantry, even if much cheaper than cavalry; secondly, the presence of extremely developed exports of weapons from Italy and the Netherlands, where they were apparently manufactured almost at the level of mass industrial production.
A. Norman and D. Pottinger especially highlight the fact that Henry VIII, in addition to inviting gunsmiths from Flanders to England, used numerous mercenaries. In particular, the pikemen and heavy cavalry riders were Burgundians or Germans, while the arquebus shooters were mainly Spaniards and Italians, hired in the thousands19.
At the same time, trying to increase the number of horses suitable for service in the cavalry, the king passed a law according to which every Englishman
A citizen who had an annual income of 100 pounds would have to have a horse suitable for military service.
Combating the extravagance of his subjects, he ordered that every man whose wife wore a corduroy skirt or a silk petticoat should also keep a war horse, regardless of his income.
As a result, Henry VIII, at the end of his reign, received an army that consisted of several differently armed and equipped types of cavalry and infantry, which had little in common with the traditional knightly army. Thus, heavily armed cavalry had full knightly weapons and fought with spears and swords on horses protected by armor, light cavalry had “three-quarter” armor without plate gloves and leg protection below the knee. The weapons used by these horsemen were a light spear and a sword, and from the middle of the 16th century. also short-barreled firearms. The cavalry from the northern border was even more lightly armed - plate legguards to the knees, chain mail sleeves protected their arms, and their helmets did not have visors. Of course, this armor was not mandatory, so many “border guards” wore only chain mail, brigandines and jackets21. The difference between the Jacques and the brigandine was only that the Jacques had metal or horn plates tied to a fabric base, while on the more expensive brigandine they were riveted. At the same time, a unique identifying element for the English lightly armed horsemen of that time was the red cap (apparently, some kind of cloth cap), which they wore over a metal helmet22.
The arquebus, a new weapon for the light horseman adopted by the cavalry of Henry VIII, was about three feet in length (approx. 90 cm) and already made it possible to shoot directly from the horse. Accordingly, this gave rise to new tactics. It consisted in the fact that mounted riflemen armed with arquebuses quickly approached the infantry formations, then fired and rode back to reload their weapons23. Thus, it was the arquebusier riders, later armed with pistols, who filled the niche of eastern horse archers in the European troops, who fired at the enemy without dismounting from their horses.
The infantry armor imported by Henry VIII from Germany, often together with Landsknecht mercenaries, had a pronounced international character, since they were used everywhere. They consisted of knee-length legguards, a cuirass, an armored gorget collar, tubular elbow pads, shoulder pads, a helmet with a visor and a tapul-codpiece to protect the genitals24. At the same time, the actual shoulder pads were often absent, and instead
The gorget used a wide chainmail cape that protected not only the shoulders, but also the upper chest and back, as well as the neck. The helmet often had neck protection made of overlapping plates - a “lobster tail” - as well as plates to protect the cheeks and ears, attached to its crown with hinges and tied at the chin25.
The traditional weapon of these troops was a long (14-18 ft) pike with a ten-inch (25 cm) tip, below which was tied a fox tail, which was believed to have magical properties. Douglas Miller, author of the book
about the Landsknechts, which went through 14 reprints in England from 1976 to 1996, indicates that this custom, which spread among the Landsknechts, was a kind of response to the knightly tradition of decorating his spear with a pennant with a coat of arms. At the same time, the fox’s tail acted both as a corporate emblem and as a kind of talisman26.
The officers who commanded the mercenaries, both foreigners and the British themselves, wore armor of the same style as their subordinates, but of better quality and often decorated with engraving or gilding. By the end of the reign of Henry VIII, the shape of the cuirass had changed greatly. Instead of globular, convex outlines, it acquired a characteristic vertical rib along its entire length from top to bottom27 - its strength increased to a certain extent, and its protective capabilities improved, since the likelihood of a bullet or arrow ricocheting from such a cuirass also increased.
At the same time, shooters, which in England included both archers and arquebusiers, then had only the lightest and most primitive protective equipment. A. Norman and D. Pottinger cite the words of Henry VIII's Marshal Thomas Audley, who wrote that he would like none of the shooters to wear armor, with the exception of a morion helmet, since there cannot be a good shooter, be it an archer or an arquebusier , if he serves dressed in armor28.
But as during the Hundred Years' War, archers had to carry two long sharp stakes with them, which served as the best protection against cavalry, if only they managed to dig them in front of their front and take a position behind this obstacle insurmountable for horsemen29.
When 40 foot soldiers were sent from Norwich to France in 1543, eight of them were archers, each of whom had a "good bow" in a carrying case, as well as 24 "good arrows", a "good sword" and a dagger, and all the rest are billmen, i.e. warriors who have as their main weapon the bill (“bull’s tongue”), which was very popular in England at that time - a polearm about 6 feet (1.5 m) long with a knife-like or straight blade, who were comfortable fighting hand-to-hand30, and used a sword and a dagger as a secondary weapon. It is noted that
all billmen had defensive weapons, although which ones were not specified31.
As for the first real attempts to introduce some kind of uniform, A. Norman and D. Pottinger believe that in England this was done in 1547, when all the soldiers of the expeditionary forces of the Duke of Somerset heading to Scotland were dressed in red jackets . Later, during the short reign of King Edward VI, individual units of his army (or company) were already distinguished by the color of clothing chosen by their commanders, as well as by the emblems they adopted32.
However, all this does not mean that at that time they began to produce less armor33. For example, the workshop of Henry VIII, founded in 1515, operating in the same England, operated successfully until 1637.
By the way, it became possible to study the history of the work of the Greenwich workshop only after an album of color drawings of thirty armor and removable parts for them, manufactured there in the second half of the 16th century, was found in 1891. The names of their owners are indicated on all the armor, which made it possible to identify those pieces of armor that were not included in this album, but were made by Greenwich craftsmen34.
At the same time modern methods Research allows us to go much further both in the study of individual armor, the technology of their manufacture and more accurate dating, and in the field of studying the technological methods of their production. In particular, this is the task set by two English historians, Alan Williams and Anthony de Rijk, the authors of the study “The Royal Arsenal at Greenwich 1515-1649: the history of its technology,” which significantly complements the earlier work of K. Blair. To date, this is the only study of this kind, based on the study of the armor of Renaissance masters using metallographic analysis methods. In total, more than 60 samples were examined, and many new and interesting facts regarding the technological methods of their manufacture35.
It is interesting that even at the very end of the 16th century, namely in 1591, in England there were still demands that archers wear protective armor such as a combat doublet, either quilted or lined with metal plates and covered with bright fabric. D. Edge and D. Paddock attribute this circumstance to the fact that, despite certain successes in the development of firearms, the quality of gunpowder for them still remained low, which is why the lethal firing range from a musket did not exceed 90 m, and for short-barreled ones pistols of the mid-16th century. was even smaller36.
At the same time, armor became more and more standardized, which, for example, in England was a consequence of further organizational
changes in the field of military affairs. In 1558, the system for purchasing weapons for the army was changed, which now had to be supplied at the expense of the population, divided into “classes” corresponding to their income. Thus, anyone with an income of £1,000 a year or more was required to purchase for the army:
6 horses for half-spearmen, three of which had to have appropriate harness, and armor for their rider; 10 horses suitable for service in light cavalry, also with harness and armor; 40 sets of armor for infantry - cuirasses, legguards and helmets; 40 lightweight infantry armor of the “German” type; 40 lances, 30 bows with 24 arrows each;
30 light metal helmets, 20 bill or halberd spears; 20 arquebuses and finally
20 morions. Accordingly, everyone else supplied weapons in proportion to their income, and the one whose income was from 5 to
10 feet per year, had to supply one bill or halberd, one bow and arrows, one light armor and a helmet. Interestingly, the sale of all these weapons abroad was strictly prohibited37.
Thus, the process of distinguishing different types of troops in the army using different types weapons and protective armor, begun by Henry VIII, continued after his death. For example, the halberdmen guarding the company flags at that time had only helmets and cuirasses, since it most likely was not very convenient to work with a halberd with hands in armor, and all the protective weapons of the arquebusier consisted of a morion helmet, and just like the rest infantrymen, he also had a sword and a dagger in addition to his main weapons38.
A. Norman and D. Pottinger point out that officers differed from privates not only in the wealth of equipment, but also in the fact that they wore short spears as a sign of their high status. They were often accompanied by page boys who carried round convex shields behind them. which were used for a long time by the Spaniards, who believed that with them they could break into the formation of pikemen, pushing the pikes apart with them. Later, Prince Moritz of Orange armed the first ranks of his infantrymen with bulletproof shields, hoping to protect them from musket balls,39 but their heavy weight soon forced them to be abandoned, just as the British were to abandon their “shooting” shields.
Notes
1 See: Richardson T. The Armor and arms of Henry VIII.
Leeds ; Royal Armories Museum, 2002. P. 48.
2 See: Oakeshott E. Archeology of Weapons. From the Bronze Age to the Renaissance / trans. from English M.K. Yakushina. M., 2QQ4. P. 343.
3 See: BorgA. Arms and armor in Britain. L.: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1979. P. 24.
4 See: Armors of Henry VIII. L.: Her Majesty’s stationery office, 1977. P. 1.
5 See: Richardson T. Op. cit. P. 16.
6 See: Armors of Henry VIII. P. 17.
7 See: Richardson T. Op. cit. P.2Q.
8 See: Armors of Henry VIII. Cover plate 2, 3.
9 See: Richardson T. Op. cit. P. 41.
10 Ibidem. R. 24, 35.
11 Ibid. P. 28-29.
13 Ibid. R. 8-9.
16 See: Nicolle D. Italian Medieval Armies 13QQ-15QQ. L.: Osprey (Men-at-arms series No. 136), 1983. P. 18.
17 See: Edge D., Paddock J. M. Arms and armor of the medieval knight. An illustrated history of Weaponry in Middle ages. Avenel, New Jersey, 1996. P. 149.
18 Ibid. P. 139.
19 See: Norman A. V. B., Pottinger D. Warrior to soldier 449 to 166Q. A brief introduction to the history ofEnglish warfare. L.: Weidenfeld and Nicolson Limited, 1966. P. 146.
20 Ibid. P. 148.
21 See: Armstrong P. Otterbun 1388. Bloody border conflict. Oxdord: Osprey (campaign series no. 164), 2QQ6.
22 See: Norman A. V B., Pottinger D. Op. cit. P. 155-156.
23 Ibid. P. 155.
24 See: MillerD. The Landsknechts. L.: Osprey (Men-at-arms series No. 58), 1976. P. 19.
25 See: Norman A. V. B., Pottinger D. Op. cit. P. 157.
26 See: MillerD. Op. cit. R. 1Q.
27 See: Norman A. V. B., Pottinger D. Op. cit. P. 157.
28 Ibid. P. 157.
30 Ibid. P. 174.
31 Ibid. P. 165.
32 Ibid. P. 166.
33 See: Blair K. Knight's armor of Europe. Universal overview of museum collections / trans. from English E. V. Lomanova. M., 2QQ6. P. 122.
34 Ibid. P. 124.
35 See: Williams A., De Reuck A. The Royal Armory at Greenwich 1515-1649: a history of its technology. Leeds ; Royal Armories Pub., 1995.
36 See: Edge D., Paddock J. M. Op. cit. P. 153.
37 See: Norman A. V. B., Pottinger D. Op. cit. R. 177.
38 Ibid. R. 182-183.
39 Ibid. P. 184.
domestic and regional history
UDC 902(4/5)|634|
the process of neolithization in the Eurasian space
P. M. Koltsov
Kalmyk State University E-mail: [email protected]
The process of neolithization and the introduction of productive forms of the economy took place in various parts Eurasia not at the same time. Scientists call the southern - Western Asian zone and Southeast Asia. In the northern part of the Circum-Caspian region, the process of neolithization took place on the basis of intensification and specialization of appropriating forms of economy. Subsequently, the establishment of the advanced experience of the southern centers led to the formation of cultures with ring-marked ceramics and a microlithoid industry in the Northern Caspian region. Gradually, the process of establishing new industries and enriching them with rational knowledge covered not only the southern steppes, but also forest-steppe territories, penetrating deep into Eastern Europe.
Key words: neolithization, Eurasia, Northern Caspian Sea, ceramics, crops, agriculture, cattle breeding.
Neolithization Process in Euro-Asian Area Abstract P. M. Koltsov
The process of neolithization and introduction of producing forms of economics did not take place in different parts of Euro-Asia simultaneously. South Asia and South-East Asia zones are considered to be first in the selection and domestication of animals.In the Northern part of the Caspian Sea area the neolithization took place on the basis of intensification and specialization of appropriating forms of activities. Further assertion of the advanced experience of Southern focus led to the formation of cultures with pricked and dashed ceramics and micro stone industry in the North Caspian Sea area. Gradually the process of assertion of new production and enrichment of rational knowledge covered both Southern steps and forest-steppe territories penetrating deep into West Europe.
Key words: neolithization, Euro-Asia, North Caspian Sea, ceramics, cultures, agriculture, cattle breeding.
Starting from Mesolithic times, processes of maturation of a new economy associated with the domestication of wild plants and animals took place in the territory of Western Asia. In the subsequent Neolithic era, agriculture and cattle breeding became decisive in the economy of the primitive society of the Western Asian zone. This allowed humanity to make a breakthrough in the field of economics, social organization and public relations in a short period of time (by historical standards). From the appropriation of “gifts of nature” and the manufacture of stone tools primitive society moved to productive forms of economy - agriculture and cattle breeding, metallurgy - and then to the creation of writing and the state.
In the northern part of the Circum-Caspian region, which included the steppes of the Ciscaucasia, Northwestern, Northern and Northeastern Caspian regions, the process of neolithization took place on the basis of intensification and specialization of appropriating forms of economy. This led to the formation of the cultural and economic type of hunters, fishermen and gatherers. Further expansion of contacts between tribes contributed to the establishment of the best practices of the southern hearths and warehouses.
© Koltsov P. M., 2012
Loading...