George 5 biography. Royal cousins. And what about “dear Georgie”

Nicholas II bore a striking resemblance to his cousin, the British King George V.

Nicholas II "Cousin Nicky" and George V "Cousin Georgie"

Nicholas II and George V

King George, 1893

Nicholas II, the last Emperor of Russia, visits England for the wedding of King George V and Queen Mary. 1893

The fact is that their mothers are sisters:
– Princess Dagmar - after her marriage, Grand Duchess Maria Feodorovna, wife Alexandra III and mother of Nicholas II
- Princess Alexandra of Denmark - wife of King Edward VII and mother of George V.
They were the daughters of Christian IX of Denmark.

Ilya Savich Galkin
Emperor Nicholas II in a white uniform with epaulettes.
1896

Luke Fildes
George V when Prince of Wales, painting by Sir Samuel Luke Fildes
1892

Empress Maria Feodorovna with her sister Alexandra of Wales.

From 1842 Christian was married to Louise of Hesse-Kassel (1817-1898), niece of King Christian VIII. The couple had six children:
Frederik (1843-1912), King Frederick VIII of Denmark from 1906 to 1912;
Alexandra (1844-1925), married to King Edward VII of Great Britain;
George (1845-1913), King George I of Greece from 1863 to 1913;
Dagmara (1847-1928), married to Russian Emperor Alexander III;
Thyra (1853-1933), married to Prince Ernst August II of Hanover;
Waldemar (1858-1939), was married to Marie d'Orléans (1865-1909).
King Christian had close family ties with the royal houses of Europe. He was the father of two kings - his successor Frederick VIII and King George I of Greece, the British Queen Alexandra, wife of Edward VII, and the Russian Empress Maria Feodorovna, wife of Alexander III.
Christian was thus the grandfather of Nicholas II, who called him in his diary Apapa (“Grandfather”, French children's word). Christian's other grandchildren include Constantine I of Greece, George V of Great Britain, and Haakon VII of Norway.
Christian and Louise were called "father-in-law" and "mother-in-law of Europe."
Now most of the monarchs of Europe are direct descendants of Christian IX.

Nicholas II, King George V of Great Britain, King Albert I of Belgium (from left to right). 1914.

The last Russian autocrat Emperor Nicholas II and the British monarch George V, being cousins (in their private correspondence they addressed each other as “Cousin Nicky” and “Cousin Georgie”), were extremely similar in appearance.

Solomon Joseph Solomon
King George V
National Portrait Gallery 1914

American Robert Macy in the famous bestseller of the late 1960s. “Nikolai and Alexandra” cites a very interesting episode, once again demonstrating the external similarity of the two brothers.
In July 1893, at the wedding of the future George V (at that time he was the Duke of York) and Princess Victoria Mary of Teck, Russia and the House of Romanov were represented by the Heir Tsarevich and Grand Duke Nikolai Alexandrovich, i.e. the future Nicholas II. English language the latter was so handsome and his resemblance to the groom so striking that many guests, mistaking him for the Duke of York, congratulated him on his legal marriage, and a certain official asked him, as the groom, not to be late for the wedding ceremony planned for the next day. And at the same time, George himself, who was mistakenly taken for Nicholas, was approached with questions about the purpose of his visit to London and his future plans.

Henrich Matveevich Manizer

Portrait of Emperor Nicholas II.
1896.

But their similarity was only external. On the one hand, there is the straightforward, trusting Nikolai, who always came to the aid of his cousin in personal and state affairs. On the other hand, Georg betrayed him.

E. K. Lipgart. Portrait of Nicholas II. 1914

As a result of the First World War in Russia there is February revolution, and George's cousin, Nicholas II, was forced to sign an abdication of the throne. In exchange, he was promised the opportunity to freely travel to England with the whole family.
When Nicholas II abdicated the throne and was arrested by the Provisional Government along with his family, he could have saved royal family, giving her permission to enter England. If you wanted to. But he didn't want to. Apparently, realizing that he was dooming his brother to death with the help of the British ambassador to Russia, George Buchanan, who subsequently admitted that pressure was put on him.
Alexander Kerensky honestly tried to fulfill his promise. He addressed twice to the English ambassador Buchanan with a request to give the royal family asylum in England and send an English battleship to meet him. To which Buchanan replied that he would not distract the sovereign with such a trifling request, because his country in such difficult conditions had no time for some kind of Russian tsar.
Having already retired, Buchanan admitted that pressure was put on him. Georg simply chickened out, or did not want to have Russian Empire as a competitor, and made sure that it would never be revived.

Lance Calkin
King George V
National Portrait Gallery circa 1914

It is curious that the British government destroyed all documents and telegrams containing a categorical refusal to allow the royal family to enter England. And if it weren’t for the memories of the British embassy staff, the British would still be acting surprised.

Ilya Efimovich Repin Portrait of Emperor Nicholas II.
State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg.1895

George V

Portrait of Emperor Nicholas II.

Photo by A. A. Pasetti of Tsar Nicholas II, at the age of 30 in St. Petersburg, 1898.

Valentin Aleksandrovich Serov
Portrait of Nicholas II. 1900
State Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow

And Makovsky. 1903
Portrait of Nicholas II

Portrait of Nicholas II. 1894

George Becker. Portrait of Nicholas II. around 1900

King George V
1911

King George, 1893

Samuel Luke Fields (1843-1927) - George V (1865-1936) - 9th King of the British Empire
in coronation clothes. 1911

Series of messages "

Recently, the country “celebrated” the next anniversary of the execution of the royal family in 1918. Despite the fact that nowadays few people are interested in the fact that the story of the execution of the former royal family is just an unprovable theory.
Nobody likes to remember that after the capture of Yekaterinburg by the Whites, three White commissions in turn made an unambiguous conclusion - there was no execution.

The investigative commissions cited facts and evidence that refuted the execution. But they were soon forgotten, since the 4th commission of Sokolov and Dieteriks essentially fabricated the case of the execution of the Romanovs.
They did not provide any facts to prove their theory, just as the investigators did not provide any facts in the 90s.
The remains that are passed off today as the remains of the Romanovs are not their remains; this is again asserted without evidence. DNA testing remains controversial.

This is because Russian geneticists recognized the remains found near Yekaterinburg as belonging to the Romanovs, but the Japanese geneticists who conducted their research did not.
This means that one of the groups of geneticists committed a forgery.
And the very motivation for shooting the Romanovs by the Bolsheviks is not correct - the Bolsheviks allegedly shot them because the whites were rushing to Yekaterinburg and Lenin did not want the Romanovs to fall to them.

But if this is so, why were the Romanovs taken specifically to the Urals, to the front line with the Whites? Why weren't they kept in Moscow?

After all this, the question arises - if there was no execution, the Romanovs survived. then where did they disappear?

According to the first version, they emigrated abroad and subsequently lived under false names. It's possible but unlikely, why would they do it?
The second version is that the family was sent abroad, the tsar and heir were left in Russia. The version is interesting, but for now it’s only a version

Recently a third version has emerged. According to it, Nicholas 2 survived and lived in public until the end of his life, not hiding from anyone. This seemingly incredible version has a basis

Historians convince us that the man in the photograph is George the Fifth, the future king of England, cousin and twin of Nicholas II

For them, their absolute similarity is just a funny coincidence, but some people are not in the mood for jokes

Because it could be the same person. Let's look at some facts

Here is a photograph from Queen Victoria's archives in 1872

Description:

Carte-de-visite depicting a double portrait of the Grand Duchess Maria Feodorovna, Tsesarevna of Russia (1847-1928) carrying one of her sons, possibly the Grand Duke Nikolay Alexandrovich of Russia (1868-1918), on her back. Both face the viewer. A table stands on the right of the photograph.

Provenance:
From an album of "Royal Portraits" compiled by Queen Victoria.

The caption under the photo is surprising - for some reason the name “Georg” and the date were crossed out and written “Nikolai”. For what?

Often, in refutation of this version, the fact that Georg and Nikolai were friends is cited; photographs are cited to confirm their acquaintance

These photos allegedly prove that they met and spent time together.

But in these photos, the first thing that immediately catches your eye is that there are few of them, for close friends, which they supposedly were....

Secondly, they are always alone, there is no one else around in the photo with them.

The first two photos were generally taken at the same time and in the same room.

The question is whether these photos are edited? Here is an example of one photo

Look, some kind of column or stove chimney has appeared in the background. Nikolai's hand holds a headdress with a plume.

It’s not very clear what kind of headdress it is, but it’s definitely not a Russian army cap, as in the first photo.

They are standing in the same position, or they changed their clothes themselves and then took photos, everything is already quite transparent.

Georg's right hand is not visible. However, the very position of the left hand suggests that Georg is holding the weapon with both hands—the left hand lies on the right. Otherwise, the left hand would fit tightly around the handle.

Mysteriously, Georg's weapon, exactly the same as Nikolai's, became much longer than Nikolaev's. There are signs of a collage, although not obvious.

Installation or not? The answer will be given by this photo

This is Georg with his wife Mary. From here it is extremely clear where Georg was inserted into the photo with Nikolai.

The costume (except for the sleeves, gloves and belt), awards, weapons and stance are the same, only Georg himself is facing the viewer

The rest of the photos could also be an example of editing - I gave how this was done in the article “photomontage in the 19th century”

As an argument that Georg and Nikolai did not meet, there are these important photos.

April 1894 Wedding in Coburg (northern Bavaria) of the daughter of the Duke of Edinburgh and Maria Alexandrovna Victoria-Melita with the Duke of Hesse-Darmstadt Ernie (Alice’s brother).

Nikolai is there, but his beloved cousin Georgiy is not. Why?

Even Queen Victoria arrived, and George?Maybe Georg is among them, but under a different name?

Please note - Nicholas of all the men is closest to Queen Victoria

And the engagement of Tsarevich Nikolai Alexandrovich to Alice of Hesse, also in April 1894, a little later in Hesse.

Nikolai is there, but dear cousin Georg is gone again

Ernst Ludwig of Hesse, Grand Duke Hesse and Rhine, Alexandra Feodorovna, Emperor Nicholas II, Irene of Hesse-Darmstadt with her husband Prince Henry of Prussia

Elizabeth Feodorovna with her husband Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich, Victoria of Hesse-Darmstadt with her husband Prince Ludwig of Battenberg.

Again Nikolai is there and Georg is not.

1903 - But here Nikolai is, but Georg is not

But where is Georg and always without Nikolai.

Wilhelm, Georg in a huge campaign of people and without Nicholas

Here's another photo argument. Photo from 1910.

Standing, from left to right: King Haakon VII of Norway, King Ferdinand of Bulgaria, King Manuel II of Portugal, Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany, King George I of Greece and King Albert I of Belgium.

Seated, from left to right: King Alfonso XIII of Spain, King George V of England and King Frederick VIII of Denmark.

Question in in this case-Where is Nikolai 2? He came to the funeral, as historians believe, he and George were good friends.

But where is he? Why isn't he there?

Or he is among them, but under the name of Georg.

What's the result?

There is a photo where Nikolai is first called Georgiy, then the date and name are changed to Nikolai...

In addition to dubious photos where Georg and Nikolai are together without “extras,” there are many photos where there is only Georg or Nikolai, but never them together.

Could this man be Nicholas II?

Appearance clearly says that he could, the fact that they did not meet and were not photographed together on the most important events says yes.

One important point is the issue with the families of monarchs.

According to official history, Nicholas 2 had five children - four daughters and a son, who were killed in 1918. George 5 has six children: five sons and one daughter.

But here comes another historical forgery. This is already a long and separate topic

George V

George V.

George V. 1865–1936. King of England, Emperor of India, cousin of Nicholas II; Commander-in-Chief of the British Armed Forces; after the overthrow of the Tsar, he was unable to provide him with any assistance and refused to give permission for the Royal Family to enter England.

The reference apparatus of the book was used: P.V. Multatuli. “May the Lord bless my decision...” - St. Petersburg: Satis, 2002.

+ + +

George V (3.VI.1865 - 20.1.1936) - King [of England] (since 1910), representative of the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasty, renamed in July 1917, during the First World War, the Windsor dynasty.

Soviet historical encyclopedia. In 16 volumes. - M.: Soviet Encyclopedia. 1973-1982. Volume 4. THE HAGUE - DVIN. 1963.

George V.
Reproduction from the site http://monarchy.nm.ru/

George V
Georg Frederick Ernest Albert
George Frederick Ernest Albert
Years of life: June 3, 1865 - January 20, 1936
Years in power: May 6, 1910 - January 20, 1936
Father: Edward VII
Mother: Alexandra Danskaya
Wife: Victoria Maria Tek
Sons: Edward, George VI , Heinrich, George Kent, John
Daughter: Maria

George V.

Georg had poor health since childhood, and at the age of 10 his parents sent him on a sea voyage. Georg sailed on the ship for 14 years without a break. All this time he obeyed the daily routine common to cadets and endured all the hardships of serving as a ship's cabin boy. He traveled around the globe, visited many British colonies, acquired the habits of a sailor, numerous tattoos on his body, and even a parrot. However, realizing the narrowness of his education, upon returning home he attended a course of lectures at the universities of Heidelberg and Lausanne.

In 1893, George married the Duke of Teck's daughter, known as Princess May. A year later he received the title Duke of York. George and Mary were crowned at Westminster on May 22, 1911, with George's wife becoming known as Queen Mary, despite the fact that her first name was Victoria. In memory of the king's late grandmother, it was decided that henceforth no queen of England would bear this name. After the coronation, the king and queen traveled to India, where they were presented to the Indian princes as emperor and empress in Delhi. During this trip, Georg enjoyed hunting tigers and pheasants, neglecting many of the official events he had planned.

George ascended the throne on the eve of the First World War. The war years were very difficult for royal family, since both George and Maria had many relatives in Germany, against which England had to fight. To emphasize his patriotism, on July 17, 1917, George announced a change of the royal family name from the German, Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, to the English, Windsor. Also, the king's closest German relatives changed their surnames to English ones, receiving the corresponding peerage titles. So his cousin Ludwig Battenberg became Marquess of Milford Haven, and his brother-in-law Duke of Teck became Marquess of Cambridge. Members of the royal family who sided with Germany, on the contrary, were stripped of their titles.
After the war, many European monarchies began to decline. Kings were overthrown in Austria, Spain, Greece, Romania, and Russia. George warmly received all the former monarchs, his relatives, in England. In England itself, the king's position was quite strong, with the exception of Ireland, where a national liberation uprising broke out, as a result of which Britain was forced to recognize the independence of part of the island. Since 1927, George changed his title to "King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland."

As mentioned above, Georg had weak lungs since childhood. With age, the situation worsened due to tobacco smoking. War and revolutions in European countries further undermined George's health. He retired to West Sussex, closer to the sea, but nevertheless lived to see the 25th anniversary of his reign.

Unlike his father, Georg loved a simple life, without unnecessary luxury. Georg preferred solitude, rarely went to theaters, but loved music and sports. He raised his children in strictness and unquestioning obedience to their elders. The king had virtually no influence on the country's politics, considering his main task to maintain order in his own family.

George died on 20 January 1936 at Sandringham. It is rumored that the king's death was hastened by his doctor, Lord Dawson, who gave him a lethal injection of cocaine and morphine so that news of the king's death would get into the morning edition of The Times, and not into the less prestigious evening newspapers. During George's funeral, the Maltese Cross from his crown fell into the mud, which was seen as an ill omen for his heir, Edward.

Material used from the site http://monarchy.nm.ru/

King George V of Great Britain in naval uniform.

George V, George-Frederik-Ernst-Albert von Sachsen-Coburg-Gotha (3.6.1865, Marlborough House - 20.1.1936), King of Great Britain and Ireland, 2 1st son of King Edward VII. In 1892, after the death of his elder brother Albert, he received the titles Duke of York, Earl of Inverness and Baron Killerney. As a child, he was distinguished by very poor health and in 1875-89 he was constantly sailing (to improve his health). In 1882 he graduated from Trinity College. He received his education at the Universities of Heidelberg and Lausanne. After his father's accession to the throne (22 January 1901), he was proclaimed Prince of Wales, Duke of Cornwall and Rothesey, Earl of Chester, Carrick and Dublin. In 1910 he ascended the throne. He changed the order at court, trying to abandon excessive luxury (often his economy bordered on stinginess). He led a solitary and secluded lifestyle. G. practically did not interfere in the government of the state, completely transferring it into the hands of the prime ministers, and was mainly concerned with increasing his fortune and maintaining peace in the family. In July 1917, the ruling dynasty in Great Britain began to be called Windsor instead of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. Largely due to G.’s indecisive position, who feared any complications, Eng. the government refused to accept

Empress Alexandra Feodorovna) and the great-granddaughter of Louis Philippe I Helen of Orleans (who was also wooed by Tsarevich Nicholas, later Duchess of Aosta). In 1891, Clarence was engaged to Mary of Teck (Princess May), for whom he had sincere feelings, but early the next year, to the great shock of his parents and grandmother, he died during an influenza epidemic, a week after his twenty-eighth birthday and a month and a half before his due date. weddings

Both his brother’s bride and his rights to the throne went to George, who received the title of Duke of York four months later; in 1893 he married Mary of Teck, in 1901 he became Prince of Wales, and in 1910 - King George V.

I missed this moment that Albert was wooing Alice of Hesse.

Prince_Albert_Victor_Duke_of_Clarence and Alice of Hesse, first bride.

And it’s also interesting with Alix.. Here she is with this Viktor.
By the way, this is the first time I’ve seen her happy))

Prince_Albert_Victor_Duke_of_Clarence and Mary of Teck - the second bride.

One of Albert's brides, Alice of Hesse, passes to Nicholas (Georg), and Albert's second bride: Maria of Teck passes by inheritance to George (Nicholas).

But Albert Victor dies and his brides are inherited:

First: Alice of Hesse passes to Nicholas 2 (George 5)

Nicholas 2 (George 5) and Albert's fiancee: Alice of Hesse, who became the wife of Nicholas 2 (George 5) by TI.

Albert's second bride: Maria Tekskaya after the death of Albert Victor is inherited by his younger brother George 5 (Nicholas 2).

George 5 (Nicholas 2) with the fiancee of his older brother Albert Victor: Maria Tekskaya.

But... Nicholas 2 (George 5) - the German emperor at the time of 1910, is the same person: the son of Bertie (Alexander) - Charles of Holstein-Gottorp, who later turned out to be Natty Rothschild 1st.

How can this happen in real life?

That is, he must have the same wife, because she is the same person.

Or this is Alice of Hesse, who marries George V, aka Nicholas II in Soviet translations from German.

Either this is Maria Teck marrying Nicholas II, aka George V English translation from German.

When was the wedding in London of Nicholas II (George V) in English version?

Country of Origin: UK
Event: Wedding medal dedicated to the marriage of Duke of York George Friedrich Ernst Albert and Princess Victoria Maria of Teck of Baden-Württemberg
Type / Shape / Year of issue: Medal / Circle / 1893
Material / Diameter / Weight: Bronze / 51.00 mm / 56.50 g
Stamps: no stamps
Medal winners: SPINK & SON

Legend 2:
MARRIED AT CHAPEL ROYAL St. JAMES'S PALACE 6 JULE 1893 - Marriage in the royal chapel of St. James's Palace on July 6, 1893 (English)

George V (3 June 1865 - 20 January 1936) was the 9th King of Great Britain and Emperor of India from the House of Windsor. He was on the throne from May 6, 1910 until his death. He was the second son of the Prince and Princess of Wales (later Edward VII and Queen Alexandra).

Now the wedding of Nicholas 2 (George 5) to Alice of Hesse:

On November 14 (26), 1894 (on the birthday of Empress Maria Feodorovna, which allowed for a retreat from mourning), the wedding of Alexandra and Nicholas II took place in the Great Church of the Winter Palace. After the wedding, a thanksgiving prayer service was served by members of the Holy Synod, led by Metropolitan Palladius (Raev) of St. Petersburg; While singing “We praise You, God,” a cannon salute of 301 shots was fired.

We remember that Maria Fedorovna, aka Dagmar of Denmark, like the mother of Nicholas 2 (George 5), and her sister Alexandra of Denmark, like the mother of George 5 (Nicholas 2) are one and the same character: Emma, removed from all sources of information Louise Rothschild, from whom they made two characters: Alexandra of Denmark and Dagmar of Denmark. That is, the link to the mother does not work.

The father of Nicholas 2 (George 5) is also the same person: Edward VII, aka Alexander III.

There is not a single photograph from the wedding of Nicholas 2 (George 5) and Alice of Hesse. Just paintings. And this is 1894, when cameras had been around for a long time and such an event as the wedding of the son of the Emperor, if it took place, had to be immortalized by court photographers for numerous foreign relatives, as well as the European and Russian press in the gossip department.

Although there are wedding photographs of George 5 (Nicholas 2) in the English archives:

Although both weddings took place almost simultaneously: the wedding of George and Mary in the royal chapel of St. James's Palace was on July 6, 1893. The wedding of Nicholas and Alice took place on November 14, 1894.

There are photographs from one wedding of Nikolai (Georg), but there are no photographs from the other wedding.

It's the same story with crowns. In the English archives there are photographs of George and his wife wearing crowns. In Russian archives there are no photographs of Nicholas (Georg) and his wife Alice of Hesse wearing crowns. In the Russian version, Nicholas 2 (George 5), as well as his father Alexander 3 (Eduard 7), are depicted in military uniform in almost all photographs, as professional soldiers serving in the army.

In the English version, George 5 (Nicholas 2) has an older brother: Albert Victor, who died at 28 and left his younger brother both the crown and his bride, complete. It was as if he had not been given the crown without this bride. Also a strange detail. Why marry your older brother's ex-fiancee? Didn't have your own brides?

What was the reason for forcing him to marry? youngest son on the bride of the deceased eldest son? Or, indeed, the crown was not given without Mary of Teck, born from a morganatic marriage and not having the right to the throne and crown?

If the crown is mine, then I give it to whoever I want. And why should I force my son to take his older brother’s would-be bride as his wife? The crown is mine. And the kingdom is my own. And I don’t give a damn about the constitutional monarchy in the English kingdom if I am the king. Logically, yes.

We look at the older brother Nicholas 2 (George 6) in the Russian translation.

Spouse: Dagmara of Denmark (November 14 (26), 1847 - October 13, 1928), daughter of the Danish king Christian IX, after converting to Orthodoxy, Maria Feodorovna. Children:
1. Nikolai Alexandrovich (May 6 (18), 1868 - July 17, 1918, Yekaterinburg), since 1894 Emperor Nicholas II
2. Alexander Alexandrovich (May 26 (June 7) 1869 - April 20 (May 2) 1870, St. Petersburg)
3. Georgy Alexandrovich (April 27 (May 9), 1871 - June 28 (July 10), 1899, Abastumani)
4. Ksenia Alexandrovna (March 25 (April 6) 1875 - April 20, 1960, London)
5. Mikhail Alexandrovich (November 22 (December 4) 1878 - June 13, 1918, Perm)
6. Olga Alexandrovna (June 1 (13), 1882 - November 24, 1960, Toronto)

In the English version, George 5 (Nicholas 2) has an older brother: Albert Victor, who died at 28 and left his younger brother both the crown and his bride, complete.

In the Russian translation of the Windsors into the Romanovs, Nicholas 2 (George 5) did not have an older brother.

Little lies breed great mistrust.

Let's look at the doubles in pairs:

Alexander III = Edward VII

Dagmar of Denmark = Alexandra of Denmark

Nicholas II = George V

Alice of Hesse = Mary of Teck

That is, Maria Tekskaya is the literary double of Alice of Hesse.

It would seem that everything is simple. The Romanovs and the Windsors before 1917 are two versions of the biography of the same man. If he is George 5 of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, who in 1917 renounced all German titles and his German surname of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha because he preferred being Windsor 1st, founder of the Windsor dynasty, then those literary characters were not there The Romanovs: Germans, bandits and the poor. They are exactly the same bandits as the Bolsheviks. What's easier?

We rename all the Romanovs as Windsors until 1917 and again rewrite the History of the State.

True, not only Nicholas II of Holstein-Gottorp will have to be rewritten as George V of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, but Alexandra Feodorovna will also have to be renamed again to Maria of Teck. With all the ensuing consequences.

And it’s good to think about the possibility of Prince Harry appearing in the role of a new sovereign-emperor, as a descendant of George V and Mary of Teck: Empress Alexandra Feodorovna.

The history of the State is also history state power. But for the Soviets it turns out to be German: from Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and Queen Victoria.

Because all Holstein-Gottorp are our modern Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, since 1917: Windsors.

And we returned to Germany 1871-1945. : Hitler is so young, and Stalin is still ahead.
And after the Partition of defeated Germany, you will wake up in the British Empire of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, since 1917: the Windsors.

If not for one “but”...

Nicholas 2 has an extra relative in the English version of his own biography .

If Nicholas 2 (George 5) does not have an extra relative: Prince Albert Victor, then there are no two abandoned brides: Alice of Hesse and Mary of Teck.

More precisely, Alice remains in any situation: is there an extra relative there or not?

She marries Nikolai (Georg) regardless of whether he has an older brother or not.

And if we remove Albert Victor, then nothing changes for Alice.

Everything changes only for Maria Tekskaya.

Albert Victor is gone and his fiancee Maria Tekskaya immediately disappears. This means no husband, no crown, no Windsor dynasty.

So far it's working out like this.

This moment somehow slipped through my mind. So I had to return to him.

Am I wrong or not? The future will show. Because we still have to understand and understand this pile of literary hoaxes and the rewritten History of the State.

On 24 May 1890, Albert was created Duke of Clarence and Earl of Avondale, Earl of Athlone. He began to prepare to start a family: candidates for his bride were Alice of Hesse (future Russian empress Alexandra Feodorovna) and the great-granddaughter of Louis Philippe I, Helen of Orleans (who was also wooed by Tsarevich Nicholas, later Duchess of Aosta). In 1891, Clarence was engaged to Mary of Teck (Princess May), for whom he had sincere feelings, but early the next year, to the great shock of his parents and grandmother, he died during an influenza epidemic, a week after his twenty-eighth birthday and a month and a half before his due date. weddings

Made me come back again and look at the situation from the other side. We are now in the process of restoring the History of the State, and here we will have to consider different options, because there are a lot of these options mixed together. It’s like unwinding a ball of tangled threads. There is no need to be afraid that nothing will work out on the first try, and new information will make its own adjustments. That's how it should be. We are now operating only with the information that we could find. There will be new information and there will be new clarifications. But we also have to work through all these versions from Messrs. Omanov. Because we don't need mistakes. We want to know the truth, what really happened there?

The exact same situation was with the father of Nicholas (George) - Alexander III (Edward VII) in his youth and with his wife: Dagmar of Denmark, who should have gone to his older brother along with the crown, but went to him.

Everything is so confusing that your head is spinning and, due to the number of repetitions, nothing fits into your brain.

01. So, the Russian version with Alexander III.

His older brother Nixa was supposed to marry Dagmar of Denmark, but Nixa dies and his bride Dagmar, along with the crown, is inherited by Alexander III.

And the same story is repeated in Albert Victor Clarence: he also had to marry Mary of Teck, and also dies. And his younger brother George V (Nicholas II) marries his bride.

Albert Victor Clarence and Maria Tekskaya

George V (Nicholas II) and Mary of Teck.

In this case, the literary hoax turns out to be Albert Victor Clarence and George V, because as Nicholas II he had already married Alice of Hesse.

Even if you call him Nicholas, even George, even the Pope, he is still married to Alice of Hesse.

We are left without a husband, Maria Tekskaya.

But these three characters: Nixa, Alexander III and Edward VII, according to their pedigrees, turned out to be one and the same character: Charles of Holstein-Gottorp, aka Natty Rothschild 1st Baron.

And their wives (brides) Alexandra and Dagmar of Denmark, Glucksburg, turned out to be one and the same character according to their pedigrees.

And then Mary of Teck, Albert Victor of Clarence and George V (Nicholas II) are simply duplicates of Nixa, Alexander III, Edward VII, Alexandra and Dagmar of Denmark. They are all literary hoaxes.

The elder brother dies, and his younger brother inherits his wife and the throne.
As we can see, the writers did not particularly strain themselves in search of a plot. The same plot is repeated. You can also draw photographs. We've already seen so much of this Photoshop that it shouldn't confuse us anymore.

We followed the faces, but only got confused. You can only go by genealogy and family ties. Forging photos is easy. But forging pedigrees and family ties is very difficult, almost impossible.

These blanks for creating photographs were found in the Russian state film and photo archive after Soviet rule. And having such power as the film and photo industry of the 20th century, it was possible to create any archives. And when the Internet and computer graphics appeared, the creation of more and more new archives of the 19th century was not a problem.

That’s why I said: photographs are very good, but all this must coincide with the genealogies and the seizure of state power in 1853-1921. And naturally, with Soviet power and the realities of the 20th century.

A correctly written History of the State should explain to us what is happening now, based on the events of at least 1853-1953. Because before 1853 there is no information at all. Everything there was destroyed. The only thing that is visible is the years 1853-1953. And then we ourselves can know, since the second half of the 20th century is closer to us and we know about it ourselves, without historians.