Morphological analysis of the word during. Morphological analysis “in the flow.” II. Constant signs

Pretext- an auxiliary part of speech that expresses the dependence of a noun, numeral and pronoun on other words in a phrase and in a sentence.

By origin prepositions can be non-derivative (in, to, over) and derivative (along, in view of, for purposes). By structure prepositions are divided into simple (in, on, about), complex (due to, from under, over) and composite (in connection with, due to, during).

Prepositions can express various relationships between words in a sentence: spatial, temporal, causal, target, measures and degrees, objective, etc. The same prepositions in different contexts they can express different relationships, for example: walking along the road (spatial), eating at night (temporal), saying something stupid (causal).

Majority prepositions used with any one case. For example, with the genitive - prepositions without, for, before, from, because of, from under, from, at; with dative - pretext To; with accusative - prepositions about, through, etc.

Some prepositions can interact with several cases, expressing different types of relations in each case: pretext s - with genitive, accusative and instrumental cases (from the mountain, from the mountain, from the mountain); prepositions in, on, about - with the accusative and prepositional cases (in the table, in the table, on the table, on the table, about the table, about the table), etc.

Prepositions do not change, and are not independent members of the sentence. When parsing, they are underlined along with the words they refer to. For example:

Non-derivatives prepositions arose a very long time ago, therefore, at present they do not correlate with any significant words: from, from, with, at, to, for, in, on, for, about, through, with, above, etc. Most non-derivatives prepositions are polysemantic and homonymous to the prefixes: drive - behind the forest, drive - into the forest, drive away - from the forest, drive down - from the mountain, drive - onto the table.

Derivatives prepositions formed at a later time from words of other parts of speech and are divided into adverbial, denominal and verbal.

Adverbial prepositions mainly express spatial and temporal relationships, for example: near the house, near the river, around the city, in front of the detachment, after lunch.

Denominate prepositions formed from various case forms of nouns and express objective and some adverbial relations, for example: about work, about a statement, by means of a prefix, due to a collapse, on the occasion of a holiday, during a lesson, etc.

Verbal prepositions originated from gerunds and express various adverbial relations (causal, concessional, temporary, etc.), for example: thanks to care, despite illness, a week later.

Morphology is a section of grammar that studies the word as a part of speech. In the Russian language there are ten parts of speech, which are usually divided into independent, auxiliary and interjections.

Morphological analysis of words is carried out according to a certain scheme in a strict order. In order to parse a word into parts of speech, you need to determine:

1. general grammatical meaning;
2. morphological features (or grammatical meanings);
3. syntactic role.

Analysis of a word as a part of speech is both a capacious and complete description of a separate word form, taking into account the grammatical features of its use. Each part of speech has constant and variable characteristics. When parsing, you need to be able to determine which part of speech a word belongs to, find its initial form, and identify morphological features.

Morphological analysis, an example of which is presented on our website, will help improve analysis skills.

In order to correctly perform morphological analysis of a word, you should remember the sequence and principle of analysis. So, first you should highlight the general features of parts of speech, and then find the specific features of a given word form.

General scheme for parsing parts of speech

The plan for morphological analysis of the word is as follows:

1. Indicate the part of speech and its meaning, what question the word answers.
2. Put the word in the initial form: Im.p., singular. - for nouns, noun, singular, m.r. - for adjectives, indefinite form - for verbs (what (to) do?).
3. Determine constant features: common noun or proper noun, animate or inanimate, gender and declension of nouns; aspect, reflexivity, transitivity and conjugation of the verb; rank by meaning, degree of comparison, full or short form of adjectives.
4. Characterize the form in which the word is used: for nouns, determine the number and case, for adjectives - the degree of comparison, short or full form, number, case and gender; for verbs - mood, tense, number, gender or person, if any.
5. The role in the sentence is to show which member the word is in the sentence: secondary or main. Sometimes it is necessary to write out a phrase and show its syntactic role graphically.

Sample morphological analysis of a noun:

There was a jug of milk on the table.

1. With milk - noun, with what?; subject
2. The initial form is milk.
3. Common noun, inanimate, neuter, 2nd declension
4. In the singular, in the instrumental case
5. Addition.

Our service uses the most modern morphology analysis technologies and will be useful to those who want to learn how to do morphological analysis correctly.

Basic rules of morphological analysis

It is important to remember that the inconstant characteristics of an adjective are determined by the word to which it obeys. It should also be taken into account that the gender of verbs can only be determined in the past tense of the singular, and the person - in the present and future tense.

To determine the syntactic role, it is necessary to know the context related to the word. Thus, a noun can act as a subject, object or circumstance. An adjective attached to a noun is a modifier, and in short form it can be a predicate. The verb is always predicate. The letter е can change the meaning of the word, and the morphological analysis will be different. For example, glass (noun, plural) and glass (verb, pr.v.).

Morphological analysis of a word online will help not only to correctly analyze the word form, but also to prepare for the Unified State Exam or Unified State Exam in the Russian language.

1. Independent parts of speech:

• nouns (see morphological norms of nouns);
• Verbs:
• • participles;
  • participles;
• adjectives;
• numerals;
• pronouns;
• adverbs;

2. Functional parts of speech:

• prepositions;
• unions;
• particles;

3. Interjections.

The following do not fall into any of the classifications (according to the morphological system) of the Russian language:

• the words yes and no, if they act as an independent sentence.
• introductory words: so, by the way, total, as a separate sentence, as well as a number of other words.

Morphological analysis of a noun

• initial form in the nominative case, singular (with the exception of nouns used only in the plural: scissors, etc.);
• proper or common noun;
• animate or inanimate;
• gender (m,f, avg.);
• number (singular, plural);
• declination;
• case;
• syntactic role in a sentence.

Plan for morphological analysis of a noun

"The baby drinks milk."

Baby (answers the question who?) – noun;

• initial form - baby;
• constant morphological features: animate, common noun, concrete, masculine, 1st declension;
• inconsistent morphological features: nominative case, singular;
• when parsing a sentence, it plays the role of subject.

Morphological analysis of the word “milk” (answers the question of whom? What?).

• initial form – milk;
• constant morphological characteristics of the word: neuter, inanimate, real, common noun, II declension;
• variable morphological features: accusative case, singular;
• direct object in the sentence.

Here is another example of how to make a morphological analysis of a noun, based on a literary source:

"Two ladies ran up to Luzhin and helped him get up. He began to knock the dust off his coat with his palm. (example from: “Luzhin’s Defense”, Vladimir Nabokov)."

Ladies (who?) - noun;

• initial form - queen;
• constant morphological features: common noun, animate, concrete, feminine, first declension;
• fickle morphological characteristics of the noun: singular, genitive case;
• syntactic role: part of the subject.

Luzhin (to whom?) - noun;

• initial form - Luzhin;
• faithful morphological characteristics of the word: proper name, animate, concrete, masculine, mixed declension;
• inconsistent morphological features of the noun: singular, dative case;

Palm (with what?) - noun;

• initial shape - palm;
• constant morphological features: feminine, inanimate, common noun, concrete, I declension;
• inconsistent morpho. signs: singular, instrumental case;
• syntactic role in context: addition.

Dust (what?) - noun;

• initial form - dust;
• main morphological features: common noun, material, feminine, singular, animate not characterized, III declension (noun with zero ending);
• fickle morphological characteristics of the word: accusative case;
• syntactic role: addition.

(c) Coat (Why?) - noun;

• the initial form is a coat;
• constant correct morphological characteristics of the word: inanimate, common noun, specific, neuter, indeclinable;
• morphological features are inconsistent: the number cannot be determined from the context, genitive case;
• syntactic role as a member of a sentence: addition.

Morphological analysis of the adjective

An adjective is a significant part of speech. Answers the questions Which? Which? Which? Which? and characterizes the characteristics or qualities of an object. Table of morphological features of the adjective name:

• initial form in the nominative case, singular, masculine;
• constant morphological features of adjectives:
• • rank according to the value:
  • • - quality (warm, silent);
    • - relative (yesterday, reading);
    • - possessive (hare, mother);
  • degree of comparison (for quality ones, for which this feature is constant);
  • full/short form (for quality ones, for which this sign is constant);
• inconsistent morphological features of the adjective:
• • qualitative adjectives vary according to the degree of comparison (in comparative degrees the simple form, in superlative degrees - complex): beautiful - more beautiful - the most beautiful;
  • full or short form (qualitative adjectives only);
  • gender marker (singular only);
  • number (agrees with the noun);
  • case (agrees with the noun);
• syntactic role in a sentence: an adjective can be a definition or part of a compound nominal predicate.

Plan for morphological analysis of the adjective

Example sentence:

The full moon rose over the city.

Full (what?) – adjective;

• initial form – full;
• constant morphological features of the adjective: qualitative, full form;
• inconsistent morphological characteristics: in a positive (zero) degree of comparison, feminine (consistent with the noun), nominative case;
• according to syntactic analysis - a minor member of the sentence, serves as a definition.

Here is another whole literary passage and morphological analysis of the adjective, with examples:

The girl was beautiful: slender, thin, blue eyes, like two amazing sapphires, looking into your soul.

Beautiful (what?) - adjective;

• initial form - beautiful (in this meaning);
• constant morphological norms: qualitative, brief;
• inconstant signs: positive degree of comparison, singular, feminine;

Slender (what?) - adjective;

• initial form - slender;
• constant morphological characteristics: qualitative, complete;
• inconsistent morphological characteristics of the word: full, positive degree of comparison, singular, feminine, nominative case;
• syntactic role in a sentence: part of the predicate.

Thin (what?) - adjective;

• initial form - thin;
• morphological constant characteristics: qualitative, complete;
• inconsistent morphological characteristics of the adjective: positive degree of comparison, singular, feminine, nominative case;
• syntactic role: part of the predicate.

Blue (what?) - adjective;

• initial form - blue;
• table of constant morphological features of the adjective name: qualitative;
• inconsistent morphological characteristics: full, positive degree of comparison, plural, nominative case;
• syntactic role: definition.

Amazing (what?) - adjective;

• initial form - amazing;
• constant characteristics of morphology: relative, expressive;
• inconsistent morphological features: plural, genitive case;
• syntactic role in a sentence: part of the circumstance.

Morphological features of the verb

According to the morphology of the Russian language, a verb is an independent part of speech. It can denote an action (to walk), a property (to limp), an attitude (to be equal), a state (to rejoice), a sign (to turn white, to show off) of an object. Verbs answer the question what to do? what to do? what is he doing? what did you do? or what will it do? Different groups of verbal word forms have heterogeneous morphological characteristics and grammatical features.

Morphological forms of verbs:

• the initial form of the verb is the infinitive. It is also called the indefinite or unchangeable form of the verb. There are no variable morphological features;
• conjugated (personal and impersonal) forms;
• inconjugated forms: participles and participles.

Morphological analysis of the verb

• initial form - infinitive;
• constant morphological features of the verb:
• • transitivity:
  • • transitive (used with accusative case nouns without a preposition);
    • intransitive (not used with a noun in the accusative case without a preposition);
  • repayment:
  • • returnable (there is -sya, -sya);
    • irrevocable (no -sya, -sya);
  • • imperfect (what to do?);
    • perfect (what to do?);
  • conjugation:
  • • I conjugation (do-eat, do-e, do-eat, do-e, do-ut/ut);
    • II conjugation (sto-ish, sto-it, sto-im, sto-ite, sto-yat/at);
    • mixed verbs (want, run);
• inconsistent morphological features of the verb:
• • mood:
  • • indicative: what did you do? What did you do? what is he doing? what will he do?;
    • conditional: what would you do? what would you do?;
    • imperative: do!;
  • time (in the indicative mood: past/present/future);
  • person (in the present/future tense, indicative and imperative: 1st person: I/we, 2nd person: you/you, 3rd person: he/they);
  • gender (past tense, singular, indicative and conditional);
  • number;
• syntactic role in a sentence. The infinitive can be any part of the sentence:
• • predicate: To be a holiday today;
  • subject: Learning is always useful;
  • addition: All the guests asked her to dance;
  • definition: He had an irresistible desire to eat;
  • circumstance: I went out for a walk.

Morphological analysis of verb example

To understand the scheme, let’s conduct a written analysis of the morphology of the verb using the example of a sentence:

God somehow sent a piece of cheese to the crow... (fable, I. Krylov)

Sent (what did you do?) - part of speech verb;

• initial form - send;
• constant morphological features: perfective aspect, transitional, 1st conjugation;
• inconsistent morphological characteristics of the verb: indicative mood, past tense, masculine, singular;

The following online example of morphological analysis of a verb in a sentence:

What silence, listen.

Listen (what do you do?) - verb;

• initial form - listen;
• morphological constant features: perfective aspect, intransitive, reflexive, 1st conjugation;
• inconsistent morphological characteristics of the word: imperative mood, plural, 2nd person;
• syntactic role in a sentence: predicate.

Plan for morphological analysis of verbs online for free, based on an example from a whole paragraph:

He needs to be warned.

No need, let him know next time how to break the rules.

What are the rules?

Wait, I'll tell you later. Has entered! (“Golden Calf”, I. Ilf)

Caution (what to do?) - verb;

• initial form - warn;
• morphological features of the verb are constant: perfective, transitive, irrevocative, 1st conjugation;
• inconsistent morphology of part of speech: infinitive;
• syntactic function in a sentence: part of the predicate.

Let him know (what is he doing?) - verb part of speech;

• initial form - know;
• inconsistent verb morphology: imperative, singular, 3rd person;
• syntactic role in a sentence: predicate.

Violate (what to do?) - the word is a verb;

• initial form - violate;
• constant morphological features: imperfect form, irrevocable, transitional, 1st conjugation;
• inconstant features of the verb: infinitive (initial form);
• syntactic role in context: part of the predicate.

Wait (what will you do?) - part of speech verb;

• initial form - wait;
• constant morphological features: perfective aspect, irrevocable, transitional, 1st conjugation;
• inconsistent morphological characteristics of the verb: imperative mood, plural, 2nd person;
• syntactic role in a sentence: predicate.

Entered (what did you do?) - verb;

• initial form - enter;
• constant morphological features: perfective aspect, irreversible, intransitive, 1st conjugation;
• inconsistent morphological characteristics of the verb: past tense, indicative mood, singular, masculine;
• syntactic role in a sentence: predicate.

It is necessary to distinguish prepositions from other parts of speech. Words around, the day before, near can be either prepositions or adverbs. If these words are used followed by a pronoun or noun, they are prepositions: There was a high fence around the garden. On the eve of departure the mood was anxious;if these words are used without a subsequent pronoun or noun, they are adverbs: There was an impenetrable thicket around, I felt fine just the day before. There are also a number of combinations formed from a preposition and a noun or adverb that can act as prepositions, for example: in contrast to, according to, along along.

Prepositions during, in continuation, as a result of must be distinguished from nouns with a preposition during, in continuation, subsequently, cf.:

In continuation of my proof, I want to say the following(pretext).

Pretext despite must be distinguished from the gerund, cf.:

Despite the rain, we went to the cinema.

Despite his father, he got up from the table.

The preposition is analyzed as follows scheme:

1. Preposition.

2. Grammatical features:

Immutable

Non-derivative / derivative,

Simple/composite,

What is it used with?

In complex 2 it is also proposed to indicate the rank of the preposition by meaning.

Sample parsing:

He, with his hands behind him, quickly walks around the room from corner to corner, looking ahead of him, and thoughtfully shook his head.. (L.N. Tolstoy)

By- preposition, unchangeable, non-derivative, simple, used with a noun in D. p.

from- preposition, unchangeable, non-derivative, simple, used with a noun in R. p.

V- preposition, unchangeable, non-derivative, simple, used with a noun in V. p.

forward- preposition, unchangeable, derivative, simple, used with a pronoun in R. p.

Union

Union- this is a service part of speech that serves to connect homogeneous members of a sentence, parts of a complex sentence, as well as individual sentences in the text.

Unions do not change and are not members of the sentence.

By formation, unions are divided into

1) non-derivatives(primitive), that is, those that are not related in origin to other parts of speech: a, but, or, yes and;

2) derivatives(non-primitive), educated

Connecting non-derivative conjunctions: as if,

By combining the demonstrative word from the main part and a simple conjunction: in order to,

By connecting a conjunction with a word with a generalized meaning: as long as, while

Historically from other parts of speech: for now, though, to.

According to their structure, unions are divided into

1) simple(written without spaces): ah, because;

2) composite(written with one or more spaces): since, while.

The types of compound conjunctions are

1)double(two-component) conjunctions, the parts of which are located distantly with an obligatory ( not so much...as, not only...but also) or optional ( if...then, once...then, barely...how) the second part,

2) repetitive, that is, such compound doubles that consist of identical parts ( neither...nor, then...that, or...or).

According to the nature of the syntactic relations they express, conjunctions are divided into coordinating and subordinating.

Coordinating Conjunctions connect equal components. They connect homogeneous members of a sentence (sometimes heterogeneous ones too, for example: She has a niece, and she's pretty, - where is the connecting conjunction And connects the subject and the definition), parts of a complex sentence, sentences in the text.

Coordinating conjunctions have the following categories of meaning:

1) connecting(meaning ‘both this and that’): and, yes(meaning ‘and’), neither...nor, as...so and, and...and, not only...but also, as...so and, too, also;

2) dividing(meaning ‘either this or that’): or, either, then...that, not that...not that, or...or, either...or;

3) adversative(meaning ‘not this, but that’): ah, but, yes(meaning ‘but’), however, but.

In linguistics, the list of categories of coordinating conjunctions by meaning is supplemented by three more categories:

4) gradational: not only...but also, not so much...as, not really...but;

5) explanatory: that is, namely;

6) connecting: too, also, yes and, and, moreover, moreover.

As you can see, some of these conjunctions find a place in the classification proposed by school grammar ( not only...but also, also, also), and some do not fit into it ( that is, besides and etc.).

Subordinating conjunctions combine unequal components and indicate the dependence of one of these components on the other. They mainly connect parts of a complex sentence, but can also be used in a simple sentence to connect homogeneous and heterogeneous members. So, for example, a subordinating conjunction Although connects homogeneous members of a sentence The book is interesting, although a little long; unions How, as if, as if, than connect homogeneous and heterogeneous members of a sentence In winter, the night is longer than the day; The pond is like a mirror.

The following categories of subordinating conjunctions are distinguished by meaning:

1) temporary: when, while, barely, only;

2) causal: since, because; for(outdated / bookish);

3) conditional: if, if only(obsolete), if(obsolete);

4) target: so that, in order to, in order to(obsolete);

5) concessional: although, despite the fact that;

6) consequences: So;

7) comparative: as, as if, as if, exactly, than;

8) explanatory: what, how, to.

These lists can be supplemented with compound subordinating conjunctions, for example: while, as if, only, in connection with the fact that, for the purpose of etc. (see above).

Some conjunctions are ambiguous and can be classified into several categories, for example to(target and explanatory), When(temporary and conditional).

Training complex 3 combines subordinating conjunctions into groups: explanatory and adverbial; All conjunctions of categories 1–7 fall into the adverbial group. Complex 1 distinguishes 6 categories of subordinating conjunctions: it does not describe concessive conjunctions and consequential conjunctions.

Morphological analysis often causes difficulties for schoolchildren, which are associated with the fact that some parts of speech (for example, adverbs, prepositions, conjunctions) are studied insufficiently, and after studying them, tasks to determine various grammatical features are rare. This leads to the fact that students do not retain in memory all the morphological characteristics of these parts of speech, which is why appropriate analysis causes difficulties.

I propose to issue reference diagrams - plans for the analysis of parts of speech, and such a plan can be drawn up by the students themselves, introducing complex (at their discretion) material into them. For example, for some, the difficulty is in the criteria by which nouns are divided into inflections; for others, the concept of verb inflection is difficult.

Through repeated reference to these blanks, not only stronger knowledge is acquired, but also the skill of performing this type of analysis is developed.

I recommend that my students create special folders with this kind of materials and store one copy (whole, uncut) there, and always carry another copy with them (for example, in a textbook) cut into cards. The teacher can model the analysis plan at his own discretion, adding or removing any supporting material. I propose a more complete version of such cards, which includes such parts of speech as the word of the state category and onomatopoeic words, which not all linguists distinguish as independent parts of speech.

View document contents
“Morphological analysis of all parts of speech”

1. Morphological analysis of the NOUN.

I. Part of speech – noun, because answers the question “ WHAT?” (case question) and designation. ITEM.

N. f. – ... ( I.p., units h.)

II. Constant signs:

proper or common noun,

animate ( V.p. plural = R.p. plural) or inanimate ( V.p. plural = I.p. plural),

gender (male, female, neuter, general (relating to both male and female genders at the same time: crybaby), outside the category of gender (noun that does not have a singular form: scissors)),

declination ( 1st(m., f. –a, -i); 2nd(m, cf. – , -o, -e); 3rd(and. -); controversial(on –my, path);

adjectival(like adjectives) inflexible ( do not change in cases and numbers ) ,

Variable signs: I. Who? What? IN. Whom? What?

among ( units, plural), R. Whom? What? T. By whom? How?

in ... case ( I, R, D, V, T, P). D. To whom? Why? P. About whom? About what?

III. Syntactic role(set semantic question and underline as part of the sentence).

2. Morphological analysis of the ADJECTIVE.

I. Part of speech– adj., because answers the question “ WHICH?” and denotes SIGN OF AN OBJECT.

N.f. – ... ( I.p., units h., m.r..)

II. Constant signs:

Qualitative (maybe to a greater or lesser extent) / relative (cannot be to a greater or lesser extent) / possessive (denotes belonging to someone).

Variable signs:

in degree of comparison (for qualitative ones);

in full ( Which?) or short ( what?) form,

in ... case (for full forms),

in...number (units, plural),

in ... kind (for the only one numbers).

III. Syntactic role

3. Morphological analysis of the VERB.

I. Part of speech– gl., because answers the question “ WHAT TO DO?” and denotes ITEM ACTION.

N.F. – ... ( infinitive: what's up t? what did you do t?)

II. Constant signs:

kind (perfect (that With do?) or imperfect (what to do?)),

conjugation ( I(eat, eat, eat, eat, ut/ut), II(ish, it, im, it, at/yat), heteroconjugate(want, run)),

returnable (there is -sya, -s.) / non-returnable (there is no -sya, -s),

transitive (used with a noun in V. p. without pretext)/ intransitive ( Not used with a noun in V. p. without pretext).

Variable signs:

in... inclination ( indicative: what did you do? what is he doing? what will he do? , imperative: what are you doing?, conditional: what did you do would? What did you do would?),

in ... tense (for the indicative mood: past (what did he do?), present (what is he doing?), future (what will he do? what will he do?)),

in... number (singular, plural),

in ... person (for present, future tense: 1l.(me, we), 2 l.(you you), 3 l.(he, they)); in ... kind (for past tense units).

Verbs in the indefinite form (infinitive) do not have unstable features, since the INFINITIVE is an unchangeable form of the word.

III. Syntactic role(ask a question and underline as part of a sentence).

4. Morphological analysis of NUMERAL.

I. Part of speech– number, because it answers the question “ HOW MANY?" (or " WHICH?") and means QUANTITY items (or ORDER items WHEN COUNTING).

N.F. – ... (I.p. or I.p., singular, m.r.).

II. Constant signs:

rank by structure (simple/complex/composite),

rank by value ( quantitative+ subcategory (actual quantity/fractional/collective)/ ordinal),

Declension features:

– 1,2,3,4, collective and ordinal number skl-sya, how adj.
– 5–20, 30 skl-sya, as a noun. 3 cl.
– 40, 90, 100, one and a half, one and a half hundred when declension have 2 forms.
– thousand skl., as noun. 1 cl.
– million, billion skl., as noun. 2 cl.
– complex and compound quantitative skl-xia change every part words.
– complex and compound ordinal numerals cl-xia with change only last words.

Variable signs:

• number (if any),

  gender (in units, if any).

III. Syntactic role(together with the noun to which it refers) indicating the main word.

5. Morphological analysis of PRONOUNS.

I. Part of speech – places, because answers the question “WHO? WHAT?" (WHAT? WHOSE? HOW MANY? WHICH?) and does not denote, but points to an SUBJECT (CHARACTERISTIC or QUANTITY).

N.F. –…(I.p. (if any) or I.p., singular, m.r.)

II. Constant signs:

category in relation to other parts of speech ( places -noun, place -adj., place. -number.)

rank by value with proof:
– personal, because decree. on the face;
– returnable, because indicating the return of the action to oneself;
– possessive, because decree. for belonging;
– interrogative, because decree. to the question;
– relative, because decree. on the relations of simple sentences. as part of a complex;
– uncertain, because decree. for unspecified items, acknowledgment, quantity,
– negative, because decree for the absence of an item, acknowledgment, quantity;
– definitive, because decree. to a generalized attribute of an object.

face (for personal).

Variable signs:

• number (if any),

  gender (if any).

III. Syntactic role(ask a question from the main word and underline it as a part of the sentence).

6. Morphological analysis of ADVERBS.

I. Part of speech – adv., because answer to question "HOW?"(WHEN? WHERE? WHY? etc.) and means SIGN OF SIGN.

N.f. – indicate only if the adverb is of degree of comparison.

II. Constant signs:

Unchangeable part of speech.

Rank by value: modus operandi(how?) - measures and degrees(how much? to what extent?)
places(where? where? from where?) – time(when? how long?)
causes(Why?) - goals(Why? What for?)

(Indicate, if the adverb is of pronominal type, its type: attributive, personal, demonstrative, interrogative, relative, indefinite, negative.)

Variable signs: in ... form ... degree of comparison (if any).

III. Syntactic role.

7. Morphological analysis of the WORD CATEGORIES OF STATUS.

I. Part of speech – SCS, because stands for STATE man, nature , ACTION EVALUATION and answers two questions at once: "HOW?" And “WHAT IS IT?”

Other points like an adverb, except for categories by value, which SCS does not distinguish.

8. Morphological analysis of PARTICIPLE.

I. Part of speech – pr., because resp. to the question "WHICH?" And “DOING WHAT? WHO DID WHAT?” and designation SIGN OF AN OBJECT BY ACTION.

N.f. – ... (I., unit, m.).

II. Constant signs:

real (-ush-, -yush-, -ash-, -yash-; -vsh-, -sh-) or passive (-em-, -om-, -im-; -enn-, -nn-, - T-).

view (SV – what With who did? NSV - what did he do?).

repayment (refundable - yes, irrevocable – no-sya).

tense (present: -ush-, -yush-, -ash-, -yash-, -eat-, -om-, -im-; past: -vsh-, -sh-, -enn-, -nn-, -T-).

Variable signs:

full or short form (passives only).

case (only for participles in full form).

number (units, plural).

gender (only for proverbs in singular).

III. Syntactic role(usually a modifier or a predicate).

9. Morphological analysis of participles.

I. Part of speech – gerund, because the answer to the question. "HOW?" and “DOING WHAT? WHAT DID I DO?” and designate additional action.

II. Constant signs:

Unchangeable part of speech.

View (SV – what With doing?/NSV – doing what?).

Refundability (return – yes, non-refundable – no-sya).

III. Syntactic role(more often it happens by circumstance).

10. Morphological analysis of PREPOSITION.

I. Part of speech – preposition, because serves to connect the main word ... with the dependent ...

II. Signs:

Simple (one word: from, to during, in connection with).

Derivative (moved from another part of speech: around) / non-derivative ( from, to, about…).

Unchangeable part of speech.

11. Morphological analysis of the UNION.

I, Part of speech – union, because serves to connect homogeneous members of a sentence or simple parts in a complex sentence.

II. Signs:

Simple (one word: and, ah, but...) / compound (of several words: because…).

Coordinating (they connect the OCP or PP as part of the BSC: and, too, or, however...) + group by value (connectors: And; adversative: But; separating: or). Subordinating (connecting the PP as part of the IPP: because, since, so that, as if...) + group by value ( explanatory: What, temporary: When, conditional: If, causal: because, targeted: to, investigative: So; concessionary: despite the fact that, although; comparative: as if)

Unchangeable part of speech.

12. Morphological analysis of PARTICLES.

I. Part of speech – particle, because . gives additional shades(which ones: interrogative, exclamatory, demonstrative, intensifying, negative ) words or sentences or serves to form word forms(which ones exactly: moods, degrees of comparison ).

II. Signs:

Discharge by value: (formative: more, let, would.../semantic: really, that's it...).

Unchangeable part of speech.

III. Not a member of the sentence, but may be part of it.

13/14. Morphological analysis of INTERMETION/ONODIMITATIVE WORD.

I. Part of speech – intl. or sound/p.word, because expresses different feelings or encouragement to action/transmit sounds of living or inanimate nature.

II. Signs: unchangeable part of speech; derivative/non-derivative.

III. Not a member of the proposal.