A system of indicators and indicators characterizing the standard of living and income of the population. Presentation - indicators of the level and quality of life of the population - social indicators Level and quality of life concepts indicators

Within the boundaries of socio-economic regions and municipal districts, individual settlements and their combinations, unique territorial communities of people are formed, differing from each other in many social parameters. Differences are found, first of all, in the living conditions of the population.

Living conditions and conditions for the development of an individual have a direct impact on the formation of the lifestyle of the population.

Lifestyle is a complex, synthetic concept that includes economic, social, political, and spiritual aspects of people’s lives. The concept of “lifestyle” is specified in categories such as “standard of living”, “quality of life”, “way of life”, “lifestyle”, which reveal its individual aspects.

Standard of living is a socio-economic category that characterizes one aspect of the lifestyle. It is focused on assessing the degree of satisfaction of needs that can be directly quantified. Indicators of living standards include, for example, the level of wages and income per capita, consumption of food and industrial goods, the level of development of the health care system, housing and cultural conditions, etc.

The Great Soviet Encyclopedia defines the standard of living as “the degree of satisfaction of the physical, spiritual and social needs of people, the provision of the population with consumer goods. It is expressed by a system of quantitative and qualitative indicators that reflect its various aspects: the total volume of consumed material goods and services per capita, the level of consumption of food and non-food goods, as well as services; real income of the population; the amount of wages and public consumption funds; duration of working and free time; living conditions;

indicators of education, healthcare, culture, etc.” . At the same time, this category is linked to the development of productive forces, as well as to the specific nature of production relations, dividing the standard of living into socialist and capitalist (bourgeois).

Quality of life is a sociological category that characterizes another important aspect of lifestyle. It is focused on assessing the degree of satisfaction of needs that cannot be directly quantified, and is largely related to the subjective perception and assessment of one’s life.

At the same time, in sociology the category “quality of life” is more complete than “standard of living”, including such factors as the level of democratization, the state of public health and the state of the environment, educational opportunities, the degree of social protection, etc. In statistics, on the contrary, the quality of life is an integral part of the standard of living.

  • - content of work and leisure,
  • - people’s satisfaction with the level of comfort in work and life,
  • - food quality,
  • - quality of clothing and household items,
  • - quality of housing,
  • - state of the environment,
  • - quality of functioning of social institutions,
  • - level of development of the network of service enterprises,
  • - level of satisfaction of needs for communication, knowledge, creativity, political activity, etc.

Lifestyle is an economic category focused on assessing the socio-economic “foundation” of a lifestyle. It characterizes “specific historical socio-economic and political aspects of people’s lifestyles. The way of life is determined by the traditions and habits of the population living in a given territory.”

Lifestyle indicators:

  • - the nature of ownership of the means of production,
  • - the nature and class essence of the economic system, social relations, culture, ideology and morality,
  • - time budget (including free time) and money budget;
  • - average life expectancy,
  • - vital statistics,
  • - indicators of the demographic, professional, socio-territorial structure of territorial communities of people.
  • - the nature of work, participation in management, behavior in everyday life,
  • - the nature of marriage and family,
  • - the nature of everyday and artistic culture, moral character, value orientations, etc.

Encyclopedic sources (for example, TSB) associate lifestyle with a person’s individual behavior, his habits, manner of communication, level of upbringing, etc., which manifest themselves in trivial situations. The most comprehensive definition is given in the Encyclopedia of Sociology: “a lifestyle is a set of patterns of behavior of an individual or group (sustainably reproduced traits, manners, habits, tastes, inclinations), focused primarily on everyday life.”

The standard of living reflects the well-being and well-being of people. It expresses the provision of the population with material and spiritual goods necessary for life, the degree of satisfaction of people with these goods, the level of consumption of the services and goods provided. One of the main indicators is the level of income, as well as the structure of cash expenditures of the population. At the same time, monetary income is only the conditions that shape the spiritual state of the population.

The assessment of the level and quality of life is carried out either quantitatively, using statistical indicators, or through expert and sociological surveys. Both approaches are implemented within the framework of the relevant sciences (statistics, sociology, demography), and at their junction such a specific assessment method as scoring has been formed. For example, a similar technique was implemented by the Government of the Yaroslavl region.

Within the framework of this methodology, the level and quality of life of the population are subject to quantitative (using indices) and qualitative (using a matrix) assessments. Quantitative assessment of the level and quality of life of the population is based on determining the numerical values ​​(from 0 to 1) of two indices:

  • - quality of life index (hereinafter referred to as QoI), calculated on the basis of statistical indicators;
  • - index of satisfaction with the quality of life (hereinafter - Ksub), determined on the basis of the results of sociological surveys of the population (in points).

The quality of life index Kob allows you to assess the level and quality of life of the population from the objective side, and the index of satisfaction with the quality of life Ksub - from the subjective side (perceived quality of life).

We can see another example of the scoring methodology in the example of assessing the standard of living in the regions of the Siberian Federal District. It is based on the index method of combining multidimensional indicators. This method involves deriving scores for the region based on the values ​​of each of the indicators characterizing various aspects of the socio-economic status of the population. The sum of points for all indicators of a given region, calculated in accordance with a 10-point scale, constitutes its index of the standard of living of the population.

In each region of Russia, in urban and rural areas, a certain way of life of people, their established way of life, develops. It covers all aspects of human existence, all spheres of people’s lives - industrial, social, cultural, family, political, etc. One of the clearest indicators of the specifics of a lifestyle is the distribution of daily time.

The main components of the daily structure are three: working time, free time and time spent on satisfying physiological needs. Unfortunately, research on this issue has not been carried out in our country for 25 years. The 11th most recent of them dates back to 1990, although before that they were carried out at approximately 5-year intervals.

The balance of the daily time fund has significant differences across the territory of Russia, which to a certain extent “speaks” about the specificity of the way of life in specific republics, regions and territories. It should be borne in mind that the equalization of social differences and the standard of living of the population across the territory of Russia has nothing to do with leveling the way of life. Along with the universal aspects characteristic of the whole of Russia, individual characteristics of the lifestyle appear in each administrative-territorial entity and even in each settlement (urban and rural).

The degree of ratio between the urban and rural population determines which way of life is most pronounced in the region - urban or rural. This is due to individual living conditions and differences in people’s ways of life. Historically, the urban image has become the most progressive

life, and the rural one is more conservative, and also retains many negative aspects. There was even an idea of ​​the spread of the urban lifestyle in rural areas. A deeper theoretical analysis shows that the rural way of life can also be progressive if certain conditions are met - the development of the housing and communal services system, the expansion of the network of cultural institutions, healthcare, education, etc. In addition, the rural lifestyle is in many cases healthier than the urban one: in the area of ​​ecology, relationships between people, crime rates, food quality, etc. It will continue in the future, naturally, with the gradual withering away of the features of backwardness - manual labor, seasonal employment, the lack of prestige of a number of professions, political passivity, etc. The basis for this is the introduction of different forms of ownership of land and means of production, the expansion of the diversity of forms of economic management, the deepening of social relationships, effectiveness of self-government, etc.

In our opinion, the specificity of urban and rural lifestyles will remain in each region. At the same time, creative activity, technical equipment for work, life and recreation, and the intellectual and cultural level of the population may increase. In the future, under certain conditions, pathological phenomena and processes may be sharply reduced: banditry, theft, prostitution, alcoholism, drug addiction, etc., which are currently inherent in both urban and rural lifestyles

Unique aspects of the lifestyle, determined by cultural and everyday skills, historical traditions, and national characteristics, will be further developed in all regions of Russia. In each settlement, favorable conditions must be created in order to constantly improve the level and quality of life of the population and create the necessary opportunities for the comprehensive development of the individual.

The concepts of “social justice” and “social bottom” are closely related to the social sphere of life.

Various interpretations of the concept of social bottom are given in Table 3.1.

In all the above definitions given by domestic and foreign scientists, the general criteria for classifying people as socially inferior are: 1) a criminal or immoral lifestyle, 2) an extremely difficult financial situation, manifested in a very low level of income and lack of housing (homeless people). For some of these indicators, we give a typological grouping of subjects of the Russian Federation.

Thus, Table 3.2 presents a grouping according to an important social indicator - the proportion of the poor population. In this case, we will consider “poor” the population whose income is below the subsistence level.

Interpretations of the concept “Social bottom” (“Underworld”)

The lower layer of the lower class (underclass): beggars begging for alms; homeless people who have lost their housing; street children who have lost their parents or run away from home; alcoholics, drug addicts and prostitutes (including children); persons leading an antisocial lifestyle

Dobrsnkov, V.I., Kravchenko, A.I. Sociology: in 3 volumes: dictionary of the book. - M.: Faculty of Sociology of Moscow State University.

M. V. Lomonosova, 2004.

1) beggars openly asking for alms; 2) “homeless people” who lost their housing... primarily due to the emergence of the housing market; 3) street children who lost their parents or ran away from home; 4) street prostitutes (including children), 5) leading an antisocial lifestyle.

Rimashevskaya, N.M. Poverty and marginalization of the population (social bottom) / Sociological research. - No. 4. -

Conventional designation for a collection of people who, for a number of reasons, find themselves outside the conditions and norms of life of modern people

Yatsenko, N.E. Explanatory dictionary of social science terms.

St. Petersburg: Lan, 1999.-524 p.

Homeless people released from prison; drug addicts

Sherstneva, G.S. Social statistics: lecture notes.

  • - M.: Eksmo, 2009. - 156 p.; Cherkesov, B.A. Transformation of social structure and stratification of Russian society/Modern science-intensive technologies. -
  • 2004. - № 4.

Criminals and semi-criminal elements - thieves, bandits, drug dealers, brothel keepers, small and large swindlers, hired killers, as well as degenerate people - alcoholics, drug addicts, prostitutes, tramps, homeless people, etc. A significant part of this layer has passed through the penitentiary system; others are at risk.

Zaslavskaya, T.I. Social structure of modern Russian society. - Social sciences and modernity. - 1997. - No. 2.

Lumpenized lower strata, including mainly unskilled workers (including pensioners who were unskilled workers before retirement). Divided into two groups:

1 - “beggars” and 2 - “actually poor”

Tikhonova, N.E. Social stratification in modern Russia: experience of empirical analysis. - M.: Institute of Sociology RAS, 2007. - 320 p.

The lowest rung of the social ladder at which a person becomes

Sociological Dictionary [Electronic resource] - Access mode: http://enc-dic.com/sociology/Socialnoe-Dno-8446.html

Typology of regions of the Russian Federation by the share of the population with incomes below the subsistence level (2013)

Specific gravity, %

Number of regions

Low level

Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Republic of Tatarstan, Belgorod Region, Moscow Region, Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Lipetsk Region, Tambov Region, St. Petersburg, Sverdlovsk Region, Kaluga Region, Kursk Region, Voronezh Region, Nizhny Novgorod Region, Moscow, Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, Sakhalin Region, Tula Region

Reduced level

Republic of Dagestan, Republic of Bashkortostan, Krasnodar region, Yaroslavl region, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, Leningrad region, Murmansk region, Udmurt Republic. Republic of North Ossetia-Alania, Perm Territory, Chelyabinsk Region, Bryansk Region, Ryazan Region, Stavropol Territory, Tyumen Region, Republic of Adygea, Astrakhan Region, Tver Region, Orenburg Region, Omsk Region. Kaliningrad region, Khabarovsk region, Penza region, Samara region, Rostov region, Novgorod region, Vologda region, Magadan region, Volgograd region, Kirov region, Ulyanovsk region, Oryol region, Vladimir region, Komi Republic, Kemerovo region, Arkhangelsk region, Ivanovo region

Average level

Republic of Karelia, Kostroma region, Novosibirsk region, Smolensk region, Saratov region, Krasnoyarsk region, Amur region, Primorsky region, Republic of Buryatia, Trans-Baikal region. Chuvash Republic, Tomsk Region, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Kurgan Region, Pskov Region, Republic of Khakassia, Irkutsk Region, Kamchatka Territory, Altai Territory, Republic of Ingushetia, Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, Republic of Mordovia, Mari El Republic, Karachay-Cherkess Republic

The group with a high proportion of low-income people includes regions that have a very low level of average per capita income. Thus, in the Republic of Kalmykia, per capita income averages 11,311 rubles. (this is the minimum for Russia), and the share of the low-income population is 35.4% (the maximum value). Identical indicators are observed in the Republic of Tyva - accordingly, 13,016 rubles. and 35.1%.

It is quite logical that there should be an inverse relationship between the share of the population with low incomes and the size of the average income. The paired correlation coefficient between the indicated indicators was (-0.474), which generally confirms this hypothesis. At the same time, this connection is not close, but moderate, which can be explained by the significant differentiation of the population by income.

In Table 3.3, the subjects of the Federation are grouped by the number of families evicted from their residential premises. Such eviction is carried out in court - both with the provision of other housing under a social tenancy agreement, and without the provision. In the latter case, we can talk about the potential replenishment of the ranks of people without a fixed place of residence (homeless people). Rosstat does not provide data on the number of homeless people, so we consider it appropriate to consider the indicator of the number of families evicted from residential premises (data for 2013 are not available, so in our calculations we use data from 2012).

Table 3.3

Typology of regions of the Russian Federation by the number of families evicted from residential premises (2012)

Number of families

Number of regions

Low level

Republic of Kalmykia, Republic of Ingushetia, Republic of North Ossetia - Alania, Republic of Altai, Republic of Tyva, Kursk region, Ulyanovsk region. Republic of Khakassia, Republic of Adygea, Republic of Dagestan, Voronezh region, Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, Republic of Mordovia, Kurgan region, Ivanovo region, Kostroma region, Kaliningrad region

Reduced level

Pskov region, Tambov region, Mari El Republic, Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, Ryazan region, Orenburg region, Jewish Autonomous Region, Belgorod region, Rostov region. Magadan region, Leningrad region, Tver region, Volgograd region. Republic of Karelia, Republic of Buryatia, Stavropol Territory, Oryol Region. Kaluga Region, Penza Region, Tomsk Region, Omsk Region, Altai Territory, Bryansk Region, Lipetsk Region, Udmurt Republic, Novgorod Region, Smolensk Region, Komi Republic, Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Kamchatka Territory, Khabarovsk Territory, Vladimir Region, Vologda Region, Transbaikal Region region, Murmansk region, Novosibirsk region, Chuvash Republic, Republic of Tatarstan, Kirov region, Astrakhan region, Republic of Bashkortostan

The direct relationship between the number of evicted residents and average per capita income (paired correlation coefficient is 0.387) also indirectly indicates the asymmetry in income levels between individual population groups. In such high-income regions as the Tyumen and Moscow regions, Moscow and St. Petersburg, eviction from residential premises is actively used as a measure of administrative enforcement.

The study of the “social bottom” in the Russian Federation was carried out within the framework of the “Effective Social Policy” project of the Institute of Urban Economics Foundation and financed by the USAID Agency for International Development (USA). According to researchers, when mentioning socially excluded citizens, including the homeless, public opinion usually defines them as a sharply negative phenomenon, while transferring the negative attitude towards the phenomenon onto the representatives of the social bottom themselves. At the same time, the few studies dealing with the problem of homeless citizens show that in Russian conditions administrative barriers are much more significant.

Note that this area is characterized by the problem of a lack of sources of information and a theoretical basis for research. One of the few reliable sources of information is the database of the international medical humanitarian organization Doctors Without Borders, which estimates that a significant proportion of homeless citizens ended up on the street either after being released from prison (25%) or as a result of losing their housing (25%). The second most common are: job loss (15%) and family problems (12%). Mental disorders (7%) and problems during the resettlement of refugees/migrants (2%) can also lead to the streets. Only 7 % homeless citizens said that this lifestyle is the result of their own choice. Remaining 7 % account for other reasons for this lifestyle.

Despite the fact that the problems of the homeless are often difficult to separate from problems associated with impoverishment and wealth stratification of the population, the reasons that brought people to the streets clearly outline the range of institutional problems occurring in the Russian economy:

  • - high administrative barriers associated with registration, as well as the restoration of lost documents;
  • - lack of programs for “at-risk groups”, for example, the lack of specialized programs for prisoners and former prisoners;
  • - inaccessibility of housing.

In addition, in this context, it is appropriate to mention that under certain circumstances, for example, when losing documents and moving to another city, only a certain range of work is available to a citizen (primarily hard and not prestigious types of work), mainly outside the official economy. Finding yourself in a risk group, or being in a difficult life situation, a person is forced to engage in similar types of activities (which, as a rule, are concentrated in large cities, where there are large markets, train stations, and charitable organizations), which, as a rule, only cements him in the social day.

Qualitative studies of the social bottom conducted by foreign sociological organizations show that the time to become established in this stratum of society is quite low, after which full integration into society requires not only the restoration of labor skills, but also psychological rehabilitation.

Homeless citizens find themselves excluded not only from society, but also from the economic process; they do not have the opportunity to fully use their accumulated human capital (among the homeless, a significant proportion have above-average education), which, in turn, affects the economic results of the country as a whole.

Thus, all the above facts indicate that the state should pay special attention to the problems of the social bottom, as well as to the sources of its replenishment. Social policy in this case should be both preventive in nature and include elements for the resocialization of citizens who are already on the social bottom. Programs should stimulate upward social mobility and reduce existing administrative barriers.

The fight against the social bottom is one of the most difficult tasks that faces not only the state, but also the entire Russian society, along with the problems of economic growth, unemployment and technological backwardness.

In the article by A.V. Trifonov’s “Social Bottom in the Megalopolis” notes that “in our country there are more than 2 million beggars earning more than 2 billion rubles a year, about 1 million prostitutes earning more than 30 billion rubles a year. Of these amounts, Moscow accounts for up to 60% of the income of beggars and up to 40% of the income of prostitutes. The social bottom in Russia is a disaster of catastrophic proportions, it is a national problem that no one talks about. Our capital is an illustrative example of such a phenomenon as the social bottom.”

According to the Austrian G. Mainer Charitable Foundation, the social bottom in Russia is more than 12 million people. At the same time, street children are not taken into account and the number of homeless people is only approximately estimated. According to rough estimates, if we refer to official data from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, “in Russia alone there are about 4 million homeless people, and in reality even more (according to various estimates, at least three times more), plus street children, who number more than 3 million, beggars - about 3.5 million and prostitutes

1.5 million, then at the end, if we take the average value between official data and the most pessimistic estimates, we get 12 million people.”

The contradiction that one has to face in the process and in the desire to fight the identified problem lies in the criminalization of the social bottom: there is a developed and widely implemented system of begging among the disabled, the homeless, and street children. As for prostitution, the criminalization of this structure does not need to be confirmed once again. In addition, representatives of the social bottom are involved in the distribution of drugs, racketeering, slave trading and many other illegal and immoral ways of earning money.

There are two main stereotypes in Russia: the first is that all homeless people are alcoholics and parasites, and the second is that such phenomena as vagrancy are synonymous with homeless people.

Firstly, of the total number of people without a fixed place of residence, 10-12% are alcoholics and parasites. This speaks to society’s superficial understanding of this problem, the real scale of which remains hidden from researchers to this day.

Secondly, the phenomenon of vagrancy is characterized by the fact that tramps chose this lifestyle on their own, in contrast to homeless people who ended up on the street for various reasons, often beyond their control (war, disasters). And it is necessary to distinguish between these concepts, because these are different phenomena that have their own roots.

Let's look at some of the characteristics of the homeless that A.V. cites in his article. Trifonov: “homeless people have a male face - 65% are men. 35% women. Age of homeless people: under 30 years old - 22%, 31-40 years old

14%, 41-50 years old - 30%, over 50 years old - 44%. Level of education: no education 8%, primary 16%, incomplete secondary 15%, secondary 51%, higher 10%;

Let's make an adjustment to the data on the presence of professional skills in this category of people and we find that the number of people of working age is about 3.1 million. 2.2 million have the education and skills necessary for technical work. That is. in Moscow there is a kind of personnel reserve for replacement in the housing and communal services sector. Moscow's potential is from 15 thousand to 60 thousand people who are ready to work legally in conditions that are traditionally not acceptable for native Muscovites.

And, most importantly, 80% of all persons without a fixed place of residence want to return to normal life in Moscow society.”

Fundamental problems stem from the underdevelopment of the institution of private property and the lack of regulations governing the problem of homelessness.

In post-Soviet times, a sharp increase in homeless people on Russian streets occurred in the early 1990s. Then, according to R. Solovyov, “radical changes in the country led to the fact that hundreds of thousands of Russians found themselves on the streets. Today the economic situation is better, but according to sociologists’ estimates, there are still between 1.5 and 3 million people.”

The reverse process is gradually gaining momentum - the homeless are beginning to be protected from society and, frankly speaking, repressed.

In our country there is no mechanism for returning from the social bottom. If a person falls to the social bottom, then he has almost no chance of returning to normal life.

The scale of the problem is enormous and in order to solve such a problem, a comprehensive program is required at the highest level, with changes in legislation, the allocation of large sums of money and, most importantly, the active civic participation of the entire population.

The problem of scientific knowledge of the social bottom is due to the fact that there is still no clear formalized definition of it within the framework of geography, sociology or statistics. Every science and every scientist has its own idea of ​​this social category, which has existed for many centuries (since the times of the slave system) and has been repeatedly reflected in literature and art (for example, in the works of A.N. Radishchev, N.A. Nekrasov, M. Gorky).

Despite a certain similarity of different views, there is no single interpretation of the composition and structure of the social bottom. For example, the inclusion of criminals among representatives of the social bottom is debatable. The criminal community is very heterogeneous in terms of wealth and areas of criminal specialization, and the question arises as to whether it is possible to unite under the concept of “social bottom” a person who has committed a crime in the field of high technology (for example, in the banking sector); corrupt official; a drug addict who committed petty theft.

In our opinion, it is necessary to conduct a number of monographic studies of the social bottom with the involvement of representatives of related sciences - geography, sociology, demography, criminology, statistics, psychology, etc. The objectives of such research should be: 1) development of clear criteria for classifying the population as a social bottom; 2) development of a system of indicators characterizing the social bottom; 3) inclusion of the developed indicators in the plan of official statistical work carried out by Rosstat.

The finding of people on the social bottom is largely due to the violation of the principles of social justice. Table 3.4 shows various interpretations of the term “social justice”, reflected both in the works of domestic and foreign scientists, and in the statements of world-class officials (for example, in the report of UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon).

In the “Dictionary of the Russian Language” by S.I. Ozhegov’s concept of justice is closely intertwined with the concept of “impartiality,” “action in accordance with the truth, on legal and honest grounds.”

Taking into account the definitions discussed above, we can distinguish 2 levels of social justice:

  • 1) macroeconomic (social justice is understood as the basis of social stability of the state and is implemented by providing citizens with equal rights and democratic freedoms);
  • 2) microeconomic (social justice is understood as a fair distribution of benefits, especially material ones, depending on the amount of monetary income of the population, which should ensure a decent standard of living for the population).

There are different concepts of social justice. Depending on the relationship between justice, freedom, equality and inequality, the following can be distinguished.

  • 1. Equalizing concept. It comes from the proximity or identity of the concepts of justice and equality. The criterion of equalizing justice is arithmetic equality. This type of justice is used in the field of civil transactions, compensation for damage, punishment, etc.
  • 2. Distribution concept. Distributive justice as a principle means the division of common goods according to merit, in proportion to the contribution and contribution of one or another member of society: here both equal and unequal allocation of corresponding benefits and benefits is possible.
  • 3. Liberal concept. It comes from the possibility of balancing freedom and equality, making them support each other within the framework of a holistic system of social justice.

The most famous representative of the concept of social justice is the modern American philosopher J. Rawls (author of the work “The Theory of Justice”). He views justice as a principle of social organization. In his definition of justice, he includes the concepts of equality and inequality. Justice acts as a measure of equality and a measure of inequality between people. People must have equal rights, and this equality must be enshrined in law. They must be equal in the distribution of social values. However, inequality in the distribution of social values ​​will also be fair when it is such an unequal distribution that gives advantages to everyone.

Violation of the principles of social justice in Russia is also manifested in the imperfection of labor legislation, which does not regulate differences in wages within one organization. This leads to significant disproportions in the amount of income received between managers and ordinary employees. The sources of information are data from the tax inspectorate and special monitoring.

For example, since 2013, heads of state universities and their deputies are required to publish information about their income. In September 2014, the full National Income Ranking of heads of state educational institutions of higher professional education was published. The need to introduce, by analogy with previously adopted decisions on state corporations, the mandatory declaration of income for heads of universities and scientific institutions financed from the budget, was outlined back in 2012 by the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin."

The legal basis for monitoring was the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 208 “On approval of the Rules for the submission by a person applying for a job as the head of a federal state institution, as well as the head of a federal state institution, information about his income, about property and liabilities of a property nature and about income, about property and property obligations of their spouse and minor children" (table 3.5) |0 °.

Interpretations of the concept “Social Justice”

A concept used to denote the institutional dimension of justice. The ideal of S.s. is a system of social institutions that, not in individual actions, but by its very structure, and therefore constantly ensures a fair distribution of socio-political rights and

material goods

Philosophy: Encyclopedic Dictionary/edited by A.A. Ivina. - M.: Gardariki, 2004. -

The highest abstract principle... to the realization of which all institutions and all actions of good citizens must strive with all their might.

The distribution of material wealth is the key to achieving universal happiness.

"Social=Distributive"

J.St. Mill (1861). In: Mill, J.St. System of syllogistic and inductive logic: Statement of the principles of proof in connection with methods of scientific research. - M.: LENAND, 2011. - 832 p.

S.s. consists in the development (more precisely, providing opportunities for such development) of the basic functional capabilities of a person by state institutions

and society

Nussbaum Martha S. Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defense of Aristotelian Essentialism // Political Theory. 1992. Vol. 20. - P. 229

A measure of equality, inequality, norms and actions, benefits and contribution (merit), deeds and retribution, demands and fulfillment in relations between people and social groups, assessed from the position of a certain social ideal (for example, goodness, truth, harmony, proper order, etc.) . P.). The essence of S. s. consists in establishing proportionality in the feelings and actions of people, in the correlation of the actions of some with the actions of others, focused on the existing social environment,

in society there is a hierarchy of values

Sociological reference book / ed. V. I. Volovich. - K.: Political Publishing House of Ukraine. 1990. - 382 p.

S.s. means that there is a fair distribution of activities (labor) in society; social benefits (rights, opportunities, power, rewards, recognition), level and quality of life; information and cultural values

Prokhorov, B.B. Human ecology (Terminological dictionary). - Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix, 2005. - 478 p.

Social justice (S.s.) is

A system of social institutions that, not in individual actions, but by its very structure, constantly ensures a distribution of political, legal, economic and other rights and material values ​​that is satisfactory to at least the majority of members of society

Nekrasov, A. I. Ethics. - X.: Odyssey, 2007. - 224 p.

This is the basis of national stability and global prosperity. Equal opportunities, solidarity and respect for human rights are essential for a meaningful

development of the productive potential of nations and peoples

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon (Message on the occasion of World Social Justice Day [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: httD://www.un.ore/ru/sfi/messaizes/2011/socialiusticedav.shtrnl)

Firstly, it [S.s.] cannot be reduced to the redistribution of material goods and even to the abolition of barriers between social classes and groups. Secondly, justice is not connected only with a person’s social status, but also with his personal qualities, with the corresponding type of work ethic. Thirdly, in different types of society there are significantly different concepts of justice; this phenomenon should be approached historically. Finally, in some cases, the desire to establish social justice can lead to much greater injustice than before

Weber M. Economy and Society. - M.: Publishing house 1 U-

Table 3.5

Universities of the Russian Federation with the highest incomes of managers in 2013 (million rubles)

According to the data presented in Table 3.5, we see how much the incomes of the top officials of universities differ not only among themselves, but also - and more importantly - in comparison with the average per capita income in the region and with the average income within the university. Moreover, within the same city, the incomes of university rectors can differ by an order of magnitude (that is, 10 times or more).

A similar situation has developed in many other industries, primarily in the public sector - for example, according to data for 2012, the income of the head doctors of budgetary medical institutions in the Ryazan region varied from 496,083 rubles. up to 1 million 525 thousand rubles. in year . This fact became the reason for a thorough inspection of salary distribution schemes in medical and educational institutions in the region by line ministries and the Governor.

The principle of social justice is especially often violated during periods of transition. This is explained, in our opinion, by the imperfection of the legislative framework, internal contradictions between the interests of the private and public sectors of the economy, the diversity of the economy, and political instability. In Russia, 2 major transition periods are known: NEP (20s of the XX century) and dismantling of the socialist system (90s of the XX century). Each of them is characterized by an exacerbation of social contradictions, an increase in crime, and a sharp stratification of the population in terms of living standards. Subsequently, the severity of social problems is outwardly smoothed out, society moves into an equilibrium state, however, unresolved problems gradually accumulate and can find a way out both in a relatively peaceful form (protests, ignoring elections, etc.) and in a radial form. In this regard, the task of the state is to timely solve social problems and ensure social justice.

84 Methodology for assessing the level and quality of life of the population of the Yaroslavl region // Appendix to the Order of the Director of the Department of Information and Analytical Support of Public Authorities of the Yaroslavl Region dated September 13, 2011 No. 47. Rawls, J. Theory of Justice. - Novosibirsk: NSU Publishing House, 1995 - 532 p.

  • Pugin V.V. Construction of justice. Social policy for Russia - Rossiyskaya Gazeta. -2012.-February 13. 11)0 Interregional trade union of higher education workers: official website [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: http://unisolidarity.ru/.
  • Drobushev. O. The difference in the incomes of chief doctors and ordinary employees should be reasonable / Portal of healthcare institutions of the Russian Federation [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: LprU/yggGGy/ribsabopz/riYuzika/ILgtsa-u-yoobooOai^auygasjei-!- 1uayouyb-5o1tetkou-s1o1]pa-by1-ga2itpoi/.
  • 1 of 15

    Presentation - Indicators of the level and quality of life of the population - Social indicators

    Text of this presentation

    Indicators of the level and quality of life of the population. Social indicators
    Southern Federal University Faculty of Economics Department of Human Resource Management
    Completed by: student gr. 2.13 Zargaryan D. M.

    Normative base
    In accordance with Art. 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 10, 1948), everyone has the right to a standard of living such as food, clothing, housing, medical care and necessary social services, as is necessary for the health and well-being of himself and his family, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, illness, disability, widowhood, old age or other loss of livelihood due to circumstances beyond his control.

    The quality of life
    Quality of life is a comprehensive description of socio-economic, political, cultural, ideological, environmental factors and conditions of existence of an individual, a person’s position in society. Central tasks in the concept of quality of life:

    Integral properties of quality of life

    RUSSIA HDI - 0.778 IN 2014

    Standard of living
    The standard of living is a multifaceted phenomenon that depends on many different reasons, ranging from the territory where the population lives, that is, geographical factors, and ending with the general socio-economic and environmental situation, as well as the state of political affairs in the country.

    MEASUREMENT INDICATORS
    1. GDP per capita. Share of household final consumption expenditures in GDP. 2. The level of real income of the population. Level of real wages and pensions. 3. Indicators of population distribution by level of average per capita income (in particular, the decile coefficient of funds, characterizing the ratio of average per capita income of 10% of the population with the highest and lowest incomes). 4. The general level of consumption of material goods and services, including by elements: food, alcoholic beverages, wardrobe items, durable and household goods, services. 5. Protein-calorie value of the daily diet (consumption of calories, proteins, fats and carbohydrates per capita per day). 6. Provision of housing and basic durable goods (per family/household and one person). 7. Life expectancy for men and women. Infant mortality. 8. General level of unemployment (number of unemployed and their share in the economically active population). Youth unemployment (from 16 to 24 years old). 9. Share of government spending on education and health care in GDP. 10. Provision of health services to the population (number of doctors and hospital beds per 10,000 people). 11. Educational level of the population (number of students in primary and secondary schools, university students per 10,000 people)

    Living standard indicators

    Indicators of the standard of living of the population
    Indicators of the standard of living of the population that are directly related to the organization of wages and the establishment of its minimum amounts include: A food basket is a set of food products for a month for one person, compiled on the basis of minimum consumption standards that correspond to a person’s physical needs, caloric content, content essential nutrients and ensure adherence to traditional food management practices. The consumer basket is a set of goods and services that characterizes the typical level and the consumer basket also serves as a basis for comparing calculated and real consumption levels. Living wage is the minimum level of income that is considered necessary to ensure a certain standard of living in a particular country. (The cost of living for the working population in the 2nd quarter of 2014 was 8834 rubles, for pensioners - 6717 rubles, for children - 7920 rubles, and in general - 8192 rubles)

    Human Development Index
    The Human Development Index includes three indicators: 1) life expectancy indicator; 2) indicator of educational level; 3) an indicator of real per capita gross domestic product.
    I - index of this type; Df - actual value of the indicator; Dmin - indicator value taken as the minimum; Dmax - indicator value taken as the maximum
    The Human Development Index provides a summary assessment of the human process and covers three parameters: 1) longevity, measured as life expectancy; 2) level of education - as a combination of the adult literacy index and the total share of students among the population in primary, secondary and higher educational institutions; 3) standard of living

    Life expectancy
    The life expectancy indicator is calculated using the formula: Ip.zh. = (Dф – Dmin)/(Dmax – Dmin), where Iп. g - index of the standard of living; where Iп. g - index of the standard of living; Dmin - minimum duration of standard of living; Dmax is the maximum duration of the standard of living. Life expectancy (an indicator of the average life expectancy) is the most important integral demographic indicator that characterizes the mortality rate of the population.

    Education level index
    Education level indicator. The education level index is calculated as the average of two indices. One index characterizes the literacy level (its weight is 2/3), the other - the share of students in the total population under the age of 24 (its weight is 1/3). Calculation of the literacy level index (proportion of students) is calculated using the formula: Igr(ob)=(Df – Dmin)/(Dmax – Dmin) where Igr(ob) is the index of the literacy level (proportion of students); Df - literacy level (proportion of students) in percent; Dmin - minimum literacy level (proportion of students) in percentage (equal to 0); Dmax is the maximum literacy level (proportion of students) as a percentage (equal to 100).

    THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

    Code for embedding a presentation video player on your website:

    The standard of living exists and is used together with a whole family of synonymous and similar terms: national welfare, quality of life and others.

    First of all, this is people's welfare, the broadest and most capacious concept from this set. “People’s welfare is understood as a complex socio-economic phenomenon that integrates the characteristics of the level, image and quality of life of the population, each of which represents only a certain cross-section of a single, but multifaceted and voluminous social organism. Ultimately, people’s welfare reflects the development of people’s needs, the state and ways to satisfy them in relation to the main spheres of life: labor, consumption, culture, reproductive behavior, socio-political life."

    To date, “national welfare” has gradually begun to lose popularity, being, firstly, a term related to the outdated vocabulary of a centrally planned economy, secondly, under the influence of the growing use of the concepts of the level and quality of life and, thirdly, in connection with a certain incompatibility of the term “welfare,” which has a positive semantic connotation, with a significant drop in the standard of living of the majority of the country’s population.

    Quality of life is defined as a subjective assessment of the degree to which people’s material and spiritual needs are met. Russian scientists have actively turned to the study of problems of quality of life, primarily in connection with the exacerbation of the systemic crisis and the deepening socio-economic contradictions in society, which is expressed mainly in a decrease in real incomes of the population, deepening property differentiation, an increase in the incidence of illness among the population and a gradual reduction in the duration of life. his life.

    Quality of life, therefore, should be considered as a set of certain characteristics of vital aspects, processes and phenomena for a person, reflecting his modern existence, both in the aspect of work activity and in the aspect of life activity in general.

    The modern economic dictionary defines the term “quality of life” as a socio-economic category that represents a generalization of the concept of “standard of living” and includes “not only the level of consumption of material goods and services, but also the satisfaction of spiritual needs, health, life expectancy, environmental conditions, surrounding a person, spiritual comfort." In our opinion, the problem of the study is not to add the concept of “quality of life” to the concept of “standard of living”, but to reflect the quality of life when analyzing and assessing the standard of living, which requires an appropriate taxonomy of people’s needs and proper assessment their level of development and degree of satisfaction.

    It should be noted that quality of life as a category of economic science is interconnected with such concepts, similar in origin and content, as lifestyle, lifestyle, and standard of living of a person.

    Lifestyle is a fusion of objective conditions and the subjective side of people’s activities, an expression, first of all, of their socio-economic activity. The way of life is “led”, practiced, it is, as it were, a general formula for the daily existence of an individual. In other words, a way of life is the typical, practiced norms and behavior of people, the way of their daily activities in the sphere of work and life, in the production and consumption of both material and spiritual values.

    Thus, the quality of life reflects the degree to which a whole range of diverse material, spiritual, intellectual, cultural, aesthetic and other needs of people are satisfied.

    1.2 Indicators for measuring the level and quality of life

    To determine the level and quality of life of the population, it is necessary to have a clear understanding of those elements that help assess the socio-economic situation in the country.

    It should also be remembered that these concepts are influenced by many factors.

    Integral indicators for measuring the standard of living are: real income per capita, real wages, income from secondary employment, from the sale of personal farm products, dividends (on stocks and bonds), interest on household deposits, pensions, benefits, scholarships.

    Using these indicators, the level, dynamics and structure of income from various sources are studied and forecasted.

    Real income of the population D p are determined by dividing the total amount of cash income by the consumer price index:

    Where D D - the total amount of cash income of the population;

    Consumer price index.

    There is a difference between real incomes of the population without taking into account services and taking into account services.

    Real income excluding services - part of GDP used by the population to satisfy material and cultural needs.

    Real income including services - part of GDP used by the population for consumption and accumulation of material goods and services.

    To characterize the growth (decrease) of real incomes, indices of real incomes of the entire population are calculated, as well as indices of real incomes by social groups.

    When calculating real income indices, comparability of prices must be ensured; For this purpose, the calculations take into account price changes for the comparable period - the consumer price index.

    Real wages of workers are a component of real income (including services).

    It is determined by dividing the nominal (accrued) wage by the consumer price index for goods and services:

    Where Salary R - real wages,

    Salary N - nominal wage;

    Consumer price index.

    In the policy of incomes and wages, indicators characterizing their differentiation also occupy a significant place.

    The differentiation of income and wages makes it possible to assess the ongoing social changes, the level of social tension and determine the nature of the income and wage policy.

    Indicators of income and wage differentiation are:

    distribution of population by level of average per capita income - an indicator of the share or percentage of the population in certain given intervals of average per capita monetary income;

    distribution of the total volume of cash income among various population groups - an indicator (in percentage) of the share of the total volume of cash income that each of the 20% (10%) groups of the population has;

    decile income differentiation coefficient - the ratio of average per capita monetary income, above and below which are the tenths of the most and least affluent population;

    coefficient of differentiation of population incomes by constituent entities of the Federation - the ratio of the highest and lowest levels of average per capita income in the constituent entities of the Federation;

    wage differentiation coefficient - the ratio of the highest and lowest wage levels between industries, regions, professions, within industries and enterprises, etc.

    Some of the most common indicators of income differentiation are also the income concentration coefficient (Gini index) and the Lorenz curve, which allow one to judge the degree of removal from the state of equality in income distribution. The calculation of the Gini index is related to the Lorenz curve.

    Income inequality graph (Lorenz curve) shown in Fig. 4.1


    Straight line OA called the line of absolute equality of income distribution. It reflects a situation where 20% of people own 20% of the income, 40% of the people own 40% of the income, etc. Curve OB shows the actual distribution of income among family groups.

    Increased inequality in income distribution is expressed in a change in the configuration of the Lorenz curve towards increasing its concavity in relation to the line of absolute equality.

    Income concentration ratio (Gini index) ) represents the deviation of the actual distribution of income of the population from the line of their uniform distribution. It is determined by the ratio of the area of ​​the figure formed by the Lorenz curve and the line of absolute equality to the area of ​​the entire triangle OAS. The value of the coefficient can vary from 0 to 1 or from 0 to 100%. It should be noted that the higher the value of the indicator, the more unevenly income is distributed in society.

    To determine the general direction of changes in income distribution, the directional coefficient of the population stratification process is used - the ratio of the population with incomes below the subsistence level to the population with incomes above the high-income budget per 1 thousand people. The dynamics of the stratification coefficient characterizes the increase or decrease in the polarization of society.

    In Russia, the bottom 20% account for 6% of income, and the top 20% account for 47%. This ratio is close to the national average. Income is distributed similarly in, for example, Great Britain, Estonia, and Kyrgyzstan. A lower ratio of the share of income of the 20% most and least wealthy people is in Slovakia (12% to 31%), the Czech Republic (10% to 37%), and Hungary (9% to 37%). In a number of developing countries this ratio is much higher - in South Africa (3% to 63%), Chile (3% to 61%), Mexico (4% to 51%).

    STATISTICS OF THE LEVEL AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE POPULATION

    Indicators characterizing the standard of living of the population; balance of monetary income and expenditure of the population; indicators of per capita monetary income and analysis of their dynamics; population consumption structure; calculation of the cost of living; assessment of the degree of differentiation and concentration of the population by income level; the problem of creating general indicators of quality of life

    Standards of living- these are his income-property opportunities, ensuring the satisfaction of his material and spiritual needs under the restrictions set by the cost of living. To characterize the standard of living of the population, statistical authorities use a number of indicators:

      integral indicators of social development and living standards of the population;

      indicators of personal income of the population;

      indicators of population expenditure and consumption;

      indicators of differentiation of the population by standard of living.

    Integralindicatorssocialdevelopment andlevellifepopulation

    Integral indicators include:

      macroeconomic indicators of the standard of living of the population;

      demographic indicators;

      indicators of economic activity of the population.

    Currently, national statistical practice is introducing macroeconomic indicators of the standard of living of the population (the system of national accounts is used to calculate them):

      household disposable income;

      adjusted household disposable income;

      real household disposable income;

      actual final consumption of households;

      consumer price index.

    Under, household disposable income refers to the amount of current income that can be used by households to finance the final consumption of goods and services or for savings. This amount includes income from production activities, from property and current income received by households as a result of redistribution operations (current transfers). This indicator shows how much economic resources are available to the population and can be used by them to meet their needs.

    Adjusted household disposable income exceeds disposable income by the amount of social transfers in kind. Social transfers include free or discounted yen services in the fields of education, culture, health care, social security, and housing and communal services.

    Real disposable household income is equal to current period disposable income adjusted to the consumer price index (CPI), and reflects the maximum value of goods and services that households could purchase with their current income at base period prices, without resorting to the use of their accumulated financial or non-financial assets and without increasing financial obligations.

    Actual final household consumption- this is the cost of goods and services actually purchased by resident households at the expense of current income for individual consumption or received by them from government agencies or non-profit organizations free of charge or at preferential prices in the form of social transfers.

    Consumer price index is intended to characterize changes over time in the general level of prices for goods and services purchased by the population for non-productive consumption. Changes in the general level of consumer prices are assessed based on a comparison of the cost of the consumer basket (a fixed set of goods and services most frequently consumed by the population). Consumer price indices are calculated both for the entire population and for individual groups, taking into account the specifics of their consumer spending (for the groups “pensioners”, “households with incomes below the subsistence level”, etc.).

    (Methods for calculating the CPI, as well as sources of information for its calculation, are discussed in topic 4.1.)

    TOindicators of the demographic situation in the country include indicators such as the level and dynamics of the resident population, crude birth and death rates, infant mortality rates, life expectancy, and population migration rates. (The content and methods of calculating these indicators are discussed in section 3.)

    Indicators of economic activity of the population characterize the number and composition of the economically active and employed population, the ratio of the number of people employed in the economy and the total population, the number and composition of the unemployed, and the unemployment rate.

    Indicatorspersonalincomepopulation

    There are two approaches to the study of personal income of the population: the balance of monetary income and expenditure of the population; sample survey of household budgets.

    Sources of information for compiling balance of monetary income and expenditure of the population are statistical and financial statements of economic entities, which are units of statistical observation, as well as the results of specially organized surveys, data from tax services and expert assessments.

    The income side of the balance sheet reflects the following: types of cash income of the population:

      remuneration of employees in cash and in kind with all allowances related to the wage fund;

      income of employees not related to the wage fund;

      dividends;

      proceeds from the sale of agricultural products by enterprises and organizations;

      pensions, benefits, scholarships and other income from the financial system;

      income of the population from the sale of foreign currency;

      business income from unincorporated enterprises owned by households;

      other receipts.

    In table Table 5.1 provides data reflecting changes in the structure of cash incomes of the population of Russia for the period 2003-2005.

    Table 5.1

    StructuremonetaryincomepopulationRussianFederation, % Tototal

    Salary

    Social payments

    Income from business activities

    Property income

    Other income

    Total

    Source: Russia in numbers - 2006.

    Guided by the data from the balance of monetary income and expenditure of the population, the total amount of monetary income of the entire population is determined, and then, on its basis, the average per capita monetary income.

    Average per capita cash income are calculated as the ratio of the total monetary income of the population for the current period to the average annual population for the same period.

    Based on the total monetary income of the population, a calculation is made disposable cash income by subtracting mandatory payments and contributions.

    Indices of real cash income and real disposable income are determined by dividing the corresponding indices of cash income of the population in nominal terms by the consumer price index:

    I real.d = I nom.d : I p.ts

    Where I real d - real income index;

    I nom d - nominal income index;

    I p c - consumer price index.

    Household Budget Survey(the second method of determining population income) is a specially organized sample observation. The unit of observation is the household. The survey is conducted by directly interviewing members of households included in the sample population.

    One of the shortcomings of this survey is the almost complete absence of households with the highest incomes in the sample population, which leads to systematic errors in the indicators.

    When studying the standard of living, not only the size of monetary income is of great importance, but also the potential possibility of using it to purchase goods and services, i.e. purchasing power of money income. Purchasing power level of cash income can be measured either by the quantity of a certain type of good (service), or by the quantity of a fixed set of goods and services that can be purchased for the amount of average per capita monetary income:

    PS = D: R,

    where PS is the purchasing power of the average per capita monetary income of the population as a whole or a separate group, calculated in the form of a commodity equivalent for a specific product, service or a certain set of goods and services (for example, for a minimum food basket *);

    D - average per capita cash income of the population as a whole

    or a separate group of it;

    R - the average price of a good, service, or the cost of a specific set of goods and services.

    IndicatorsexpensesAndconsumptionpopulation

    The volume of consumption of material goods and services by the population, determined by the balance of monetary income and expenditure of the population, is the most general indicator of consumption, since the structure of population consumption can be analyzed using the balance.

    Cash expenditures of the population grouped as follows:

      purchase of goods and payment for services;

      mandatory payments and voluntary contributions;

    * Minimum food basket- a set of food products compiled taking into account the norms of physiological needs for nutrients and energy and providing the minimum required amount of calories.

      increase in savings in deposits and securities;
      buying a property;

      expenses of the population for the purchase of foreign currency;

      money sent via transfers.

    Consumer expenses of the population only that part of monetary expenditures is called that is directed by households directly to the purchase of consumer goods and personal services for current consumption.

    This includes the following costs:

    To purchase food for home nutrition;

      for eating out;

      for the purchase of non-food products (clothing, shoes, television and radio equipment, recreational items, vehicles, fuel, furniture, etc.);

      for the purchase of alcoholic beverages;

      to pay for services (housing, utilities, household and medical services, education, services of cultural institutions, etc.).

    When studying consumption volumes, actual consumption is compared with existing standards. One of the main standards is living wage (minimum consumer budget), calculated for various socio-demographic groups of the population (working-age population by sex and age; pensioners; children of two age groups: 0-6 and 7-15 years), as well as by regions of Russia.

    The subsistence minimum is defined as the sum of the valuation of a set set of food products, expenses for non-food goods and services, taxes and mandatory payments:

    A = B + C+ D + E,

    Where A- the cost of living;

    IN- cost of the minimum food basket

    ( Where q i - consumption standard i-th food product, a p i - its average price);

    C - valuation of consumption of non-food products;

    D - valuation of expenses for paid services;

    E- expenses for taxes and mandatory payments.

    When calculating the last three components, the actual structure of expenditures in the budgets of the poorest 10% of the population is taken into account.

    Based on information about the income and expenses of the population, it is calculated consumer expenditure elasticity coefficient population by income, characterizing by what percentage the population's expenses change when their income changes by 1%:

    Where Y- absolute increase in population expenditures

    compared to the base period;

    X- absolute increase in income of the population compared

    with a base period;

    Y o - the amount of expenses in the base period;

    X O - the amount of income in the base period.

    Indicators of differentiation of the population by standard of living

    The basis for measuring economic differentiation of the population is the analysis of inequality in the distribution of income between individual groups of the population. For assessment of population differentiation by standard of living The following indicators are used:

      distribution of the population by level of average per capita income;

      coefficients of differentiation of income of the population;

      distribution of the total amount of cash income among various population groups;

      income concentration ratio (Gini index);
      population with incomes below the poverty line, poverty rate.

    To study the characteristics of differentiation of the population by income level, the structural characteristics of distribution series (mode, median, quartiles, deciles, etc.), as well as indicators of variation (standard deviation, mean quartile deviation, coefficient of variation, etc.) are used.

    Modal income Mo- This is the income level that is most common among the population. To calculate the mode in distribution series with equal intervals, use the formula

    ,

    Where x 0 – lower limit of the modal interval;

    i– interval size;

    f Mo– frequency of the modal interval;

    f Mo -1 – frequency of the interval preceding the modal one;

    f Mo +1 – frequency of the interval following the modal one.

    In the case of uneven distribution of a characteristic within intervals (in particular, with a gradual increase in intervals), frequencies cannot be used to calculate the mode. To compare groups with each other, instead of frequency, it is used distribution density (t= f i / i), characterizing the number of population units per unit length of the interval. In this case, the modal interval is determined by the maximum density, and the mode is calculated as follows:

    Median income Me - this is the income level that divides the income distribution series into two equal parts: half of the population has a per capita income not exceeding the median income, and the other half has an income not less than the median. To calculate the median, the formula is used:

    Where x 0 - lower limit of the median interval;

    P- population size;

    F M e-1 - accumulated frequency of the interval preceding the median;

    f Me - frequency of the median interval.

    Similarly defined quartiles(income levels dividing the population into four equal parts) and deciles(income levels dividing the population into ten equal parts). Methods for calculating these indicators were discussed in the first part of the course “Statistics” (“General Theory of Statistics”).

    The degree of differentiation of the population in terms of average per capita income is assessed using differentiation coefficients income. There are two indicators of differentiation:

      coefficient of stock differentiation (K f ) - the ratio between the average incomes of the compared population groups (usually the average income received by 10% of the population With highest and 10% of the population with the lowest income):

    ;

      decile coefficient of income differentiation (K D ), which shows how many times the minimum income among the top 10% of the population exceeds the maximum income among the bottom 10% of the population. It is calculated by comparing the ninth and first deciles:

    .

    Tool analysis of population income concentration is the Lorenz curve and the income concentration index (Gini coefficient) and the stock differentiation coefficient calculated on its basis. Lorenz curve establishes a correspondence between the population size and the amount of total income received. To construct it, the population is divided into groups that are equal in size and differ in the level of average per capita income. Groups are ranked by average per capita income. For each group there are determined frequencies- shares in the total population (
    , Where f i Population i- th group f i– total population ) and shares in total income (
    , Where - average income in i-group), and on their basis – accumulated frequencies. . With an even distribution of income, the tenth of the population with the lowest incomes will have 10% of the total income, the twentieth - 20% of the total income, etc. In Fig. 5.1, the uniform distribution of income is represented by a straight line that connects the origin and point C.

    The line corresponding to the actual distribution of income deviates from the line of uniform distribution the more, the greater the inequality in income distribution.



    Income concentration ratio G (Gini coefficient)

    allows you to analyze the degree of concentration of income among different groups of the population and quantify the unevenness of their distribution. The Gini coefficient is calculated using data on the accumulated frequencies of population size and monetary income and varies from 0 to 1:

    Where k - number of grouping intervals;

    R i - share of the population with average per capita income,

    not exceeding the upper limit i-th interval;

    q i - share of income i- population group in total

    income, calculated on an accrual basis.

    Poverty rate is called a relative indicator, calculated as a percentage of the population with an income level below the subsistence level to the total population of the country (region).

    Socialindicatorsqualitylifepopulation

    To qualitatively characterize the living conditions of the population, it is necessary to use social statistics indicators.

    Currently, the UN has developed a concept of living standards, which includes the following main components:

    1 . Health:

      quality of the health care system;

      ensuring a healthy human life.

    2 . Ensuring knowledge acquisition:

      teaching children;

      personal training opportunity;

      ability to maintain knowledge;

      a person's satisfaction with his or her level of development.

      Preservation and enrichment of the cultural level.

      Employment and quality of working life.

      Possibility of purchasing goods and using services:

      level of personal income and property ownership;

      degree of equality in the distribution of income and property;

      quality, variety and availability of services for personal and public consumption.

      State of the environment.

      Personal safety and justice.

      Participation in public life.

    To study such a component of living standards as population health, it is necessary to have information on life expectancy, mortality rates, prevalence and incidence of diseases for the population as a whole and its demographic groups, and the level of development of treatment and preventive care for the population. In turn, the level of development of medical and preventive care to the population is characterized by such indicators as the number of medical institutions and the number of hospital beds, as well as the number of medical personnel per 10 thousand people, etc.

    For characteristics state of education the country uses such indicators as the number and composition of educational institutions, the number of students, the number and quality of teaching staff, the provision of technical means of education, library funds, etc. The level of education is determined for the entire population, men and women, for various age groups and measured by the following indicators:

      number of literate people per 100 people aged 9 to 49 years;

      the number of persons with a certain level of education (higher, incomplete higher, specialized secondary, general secondary, incomplete secondary, primary) per 1000 people aged 15 years and older.

    Important characteristics when studying level of well-being of the population are the provision of information, the degree of development of the network of sports facilities, cultural and art institutions, recreation and tourism.

    Has a huge impact on the quality of life state of the environment. In this regard, information is needed on the quality of the habitat (water, soil, air), on the compliance of actual pollution levels with standard indicators.

    In the last years of the 20th century, it was widely discussed human development concept. The authors of the concept emphasized the need to create conditions under which people's lives would be long, healthy and filled with creativity.

    Since the concept of human development is extremely diverse, it is very important to build the most comprehensive system

    indicators.

    It is used as a general characteristic human development index(HDI), however, it cannot reflect all aspects of human life. Unlike GNP per capita, which serves as a measure of only welfare and economic well-being, HDI is calculated on the basis of basic indicators (determined for all countries using comparable methods), each of which characterizes one direction of human development - longevity, achieved level of education , standard of living. The Human Development Index allows not only to compare countries and regions, but also to justify their development priorities.

    Tasks.

    Task 5.1.1. There are data for 2005 on the distribution of the population of the Russian Federation by average per capita monetary income:

    Million people

    Whole population

    Including with average per capita monetary

    income, rub. per month:

    8000,1-12 000,0

    over 12,000.0

    Calculate modal, median and average incomes, decile coefficient of differentiation of income of the population and income concentration index (Gini coefficient).

    Solution

    1. To solve the problem, let's create an additional table.

    DistributionpopulationRussianFederationByaverage per capitamonetaryincomeV 2005 G.

    Average per capita monetary

    income,

    rub. per month

    Interval central value

    Population share% to the end

    Distribution density

    Cumulative population frequency

    8000,1 12 000,0

    Over 12,000.0

    Total

    2. Let’s calculate the indicators of the distribution center:

    a) arithmetic mean

    /0.0613=5079.29 rub.

    c) median

    Where

    3. calculate the first and tenth deciles:

    those. 10% of the population had an income of no more than 2264.14 rubles.

    those. 10% of the population had an average per capita income of more than 13,649.7 rubles.

    Using the calculated deciles, we calculate the decile differentiation coefficient:

    Consequently, in 2005, the minimum income of the richest 10% of the population exceeded the maximum income of the poorest 10% of the population by more than 6 times.2000.0

    8000,1-12 000,0

    Over 12,000.0

    Total

    We find the total income using the formula

    For example, for the first group this value is equal to
    , for the second group - respectively
    etc.

    Since the accumulated frequencies in the last table are presented as a percentage of the total, to determine the Gini coefficient, the total sums of the last two columns must be divided by 10,000:

    Level level and quality life populationCoursework >> Economics

    ... level And quality life population". The object of the study is statistical methods of study level And quality life population... 1.3 Statistical methods of study level life population Statistics explores the quantitative characteristics of the formation...

    graduate work

    1.1 Level and quality of life of the population, indicators and their essence

    The history of studying the problem of the level and quality of life begins in XVIII. This problem was dealt with by such famous scientists, economists and philosophers as A. Smith, D. Ricardo, K. Marx and modern researchers of the 20th century F. Hayek, P. Townsend and others.

    The works of A. Smith reveal the relative nature of poverty through the connection between poverty and social shame, i.e. the gap between social standards and the material ability to adhere to them. In the 19th century, it was proposed to calculate the poverty line based on family budgets and thereby introduce the criterion of absolute poverty, linking the criteria for determining poverty with the level of income and satisfaction of the individual’s basic needs related to maintaining a certain level of his working capacity and health. A significant contribution to the study of problems of the level and quality of life was made by both economists and sociologists, most of whom recognized the pattern of existence of different standards of living of people in society.

    The first studies of the living standards of different social groups in Russia were carried out in 1909 by A.M. Stop. . According to this survey, the lowest income groups (below 250 rubles) spent more than three quarters of all income on physiological needs, while the highest income groups (more than 900 rubles) spent a little more than half, and the budgets of the unemployed were also specifically examined. In 1918, the first minimum budget was drawn up. In 1927, the budgets of city workers and employees were examined, and in 1929, the budgets of collective farmers, but the latter were largely falsified. Subsequently, these survey data were prohibited, because the results differed sharply from the official descriptions of living standards. The most “indecent” fact, from the point of view of the authorities, is the rapid increase in alcohol consumption to the detriment of life and family expenses. In the post-war period, the only work by employees of the Institute of Labor G.S. was published in the USSR. Sargsyan and N.P. Kuznetsova, who dealt with the problems of poverty, but using only the term low-income, which continued to be used until 1990.

    Having examined the history of studying the problem of the level and quality of life of the population, let us move on to clarify the concept and essence of these definitions.

    Standard of living is a complex socio-economic category that reflects the level of development of physical, spiritual and social needs, the degree of their satisfaction and the conditions in society for the development and satisfaction of these needs.

    The standard of living is a multifaceted phenomenon that depends on many different reasons, ranging from the territory where the population lives, that is, geographical factors, and ending with the general socio-economic and environmental situation, as well as the state of political affairs in the country. The standard of living can be influenced to one degree or another by the demographic situation, housing and production conditions, and the volume and quality of consumer goods. All the most significant factors can be combined into the following groups:

    Political factors;

    Economic forces;

    Social factors;

    Scientific and technical progress.

    Determining the standard of living is a complex and ambiguous process. Since, on the one hand, it depends on the composition and magnitude of the needs of society, and on the other, it is limited by the possibilities for satisfying them, again based on various factors determining the economic, political and social situation in the country. This includes the efficiency of production and the service sector, the state of scientific and technological progress, the cultural and educational level of the population, national characteristics, etc.

    The standard of living is determined by a system of indicators, each of which gives an idea of ​​one aspect of human life. There is a classification of indicators according to individual criteria: general and specific; economic and socio-demographic; objective and subjective; cost and natural; quantitative and qualitative; indicators of proportions and consumption patterns; statistical indicators, etc.

    General indicators include the size of national income and the national wealth consumption fund per capita. They characterize the general achievements of the socio-economic development of society. Particular indicators include working conditions, provision of housing and amenities, level of socio-cultural services, etc.

    Economic indicators characterize the economic side of the life of society, the economic possibilities of meeting its needs. These include indicators characterizing the level of economic development of society and the well-being of the population (nominal and real incomes, employment, etc.). Socio-demographic indicators characterize the gender, age, professional composition of the population, and the physical reproduction of the labor force.

    The division of indicators into objective and subjective is associated with the justification of changes in people’s life activities and are divided depending on the degree of subjectivity of the assessment made.

    Value indicators include all indicators in monetary terms, while natural indicators characterize the volume of consumption of specific material goods and services in physical terms.

    To characterize the standard of living, quantitative and qualitative indicators are of great importance. Quantitative ones determine the volume of consumption of specific material goods and services, and qualitative ones determine the qualitative aspect of the well-being of the population.

    An important role in determining the standard of living is played by statistical indicators, which include general indicators, indicators of income, consumption and expenditure, cash savings, accumulated property and housing of the population, and a number of others.

    The concept of standard of living is inseparably linked with the concept of quality of life.

    The standard of living assesses the quality of life of the population and serves as a criterion for choosing the directions and priorities of the state’s economic and social policy. According to most sociologists, the main definition of quality of life is the following: quality of life is a set of indicators of the general well-being of people, characterizing the level of material consumption (standard of living), as well as the consumption of directly unpaid benefits.

    The most complete definition of the quality of life of the population, in the opinion of the author, is the definition given by the director of the State Institution “All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Technical Aesthetics” (VNIITE) of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Kulaikin: “The quality of life of the population is determined by the vital potential of society, its social groups, individual citizens and the correspondence of the characteristics of processes, means, conditions and results of their life activities to socially positive needs, values ​​and goals. The quality of life is manifested in people’s subjective satisfaction with themselves and their lives, as well as in the objective characteristics characteristic of human life as a biological, mental (spiritual) and social phenomenon.”

    A high quality of life for an individual citizen is when he:

    There is a high life potential (good health, a sense of self-efficacy, the desire for an active meaningful life, the presence of abilities, a good education);

    A system of personally significant and, at the same time, socially positive meaning and life orientations, values, interests, goals and styles of behavior has been formed;

    Basic physiological and psychological needs are satisfied;

    Priority is given to secondary needs - personal growth and creative activity, there are conditions for their implementation;

    Meaningful life activities are carried out with milestone and final achievements, positive emotions and feelings prevail.

    A high quality of life in a society is when:

    There is a high life potential of society, that is, the absolute majority of citizens identify themselves with Russian society and at the same time feel safe in all respects, and their life activities correspond to the criteria described above for the high quality of life of an individual citizen;

    The basic needs of all members of society are satisfied at a level not lower than the minimum social standard, that is, there is no poverty;

    Political, social, entrepreneurial, industrial, economic, scientific, cultural activities are carried out in all areas of socio-economic development with milestone achievements that contribute to the quality of life of the entire population;

    The vast majority of the population are satisfied with their country and what is happening in it, and feel a sense of pride in it.

    Quality of life involves:

    Clean environment;

    Personal and national security;

    Political and economic freedoms.

    Quality of life is considered as a system of indicators characterizing the degree of implementation of people’s life strategies and satisfaction of their life needs. Improving the quality of life is increasing people's opportunities to solve their problems, achieve personal success and individual happiness.

    In many foreign countries, quality of life, in addition to the above criteria, is understood as the financial security of the community, unity with nature, responsibility to future generations and much more.

    The main areas of quality of life include: :

    work life;

    the sphere of development of people's abilities;

    family life;

    life and health maintenance;

    life of the disabled;

    environment;

    life in experimental economic situations.

    In characterizing the essence of quality of life as a socio-economic category, it is necessary to emphasize its main feature: quality of life is a sociological category that covers all spheres of society, since they all contain people’s lives and their quality.

    Quality of life has two sides: objective and subjective. The criterion for objective assessment of the quality of life is the scientific standards of people's needs and interests, in relation to which one can objectively judge the degree of satisfaction of these needs and interests. On the other hand, the needs and interests of people are individual and the degree of their satisfaction can only be assessed by the subjects themselves. They are not fixed by statistical values ​​and practically exist only in the minds of people and, accordingly, in their personal opinions and assessments. .

    Quality of life shows the degree of development and completeness of satisfaction of the entire complex of needs and interests of people, manifested both in various types of activities and in the very sense of life and, like the standard of living, includes the conditions, results and nature of work, demographic, ethnographic and environmental aspects of human existence.

    One of the most important prerequisites for achieving the highest possible quality of life for the population is the implementation of an effective policy for the well-being of the population. The central place in welfare policy is occupied by the income of the population, their differentiation, and the constant increase in the quality of life of citizens.

    The quantitative characteristics of the level and quality of life are determined by a system of indicators. which make it possible to analyze the real level and quality of life of the population, calculate their indicators by region, by socio-demographic groups of the population, determine trends in indicators and carry out international comparisons.

    The system of indicators includes integral and partial, natural and cost indicators. .

    The level and quality of life are determined by a system of indicators, and each definition uses its own system of indicators. Next, we will consider the indicators characterizing these concepts.

    Welfare of the population and social policy of the Russian Federation

    When starting to consider the problem of well-being, it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that it most fully manifests itself in the economic and ethical aspects of human life and society...

    General methodological approaches to the formation of a system of quality of life standards

    Over the past decade, the economic system of the Russian Federation has undergone dramatic changes, which has radically affected both the state’s employment policy...

    Key indicators of quality of life, economic development and growth

    International Living magazine has published its quality of life index in different countries. According to the publication, France can be considered the country with the highest quality of life. The International Living index takes into account the cost of living, infrastructure...

    The situation of pensioners in the Moscow labor market

    Recently, throughout the world there has been an increase in interest in the problem of the level and quality of life of people; it is attracting more and more attention from both researchers and practitioners involved in the development and implementation of social policy...

    The problem of low indicators of the quality of life of the population

    Problems of increasing the level and quality of life of the population of the Russian Federation

    Social policy of the Republic of Belarus

    social policy consumer basket Standard of living is an economic category and social standard that characterizes the degree to which the physical and social needs of people are met...

    Social policy: main directions and implementation mechanism

    Social policy is designed to promote the development of relations of justice in society, to form a system of social protection, as well as to provide conditions for the growth of well-being and the implementation of a certain income policy...

    Sociological analysis of the lifestyle of young people in the new Russia in Stavropol

    The category “lifestyle” is widely used by representatives of various disciplines related to the study of the social and cultural life of people: economics, sociology, social psychology, history, cultural theory, etc...

    Statistical study of the level and quality of life of the population using the example of the municipal formation "Urvansky District" of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic

    The term "standard of living" is inextricably linked with the term "quality of life", which is an indicator of a person's overall well-being, which is broader than material security...

    Standards of living

    Standards of living

    Krasnoyarsk is the administrative center of the Krasnoyarsk Territory. It is located 3955 km east of Moscow on the Yenisei River, and is a river port and a major transport hub in Eastern Siberia...

    Level and quality of life

    The main goals of man are survival, pleasure and development. Therefore, when assessing human life, one should take into account the degree to which an individual achieves these three goals. In the era of the formation of civilization...

    Level and quality of life, their main indicators

    The standard of living of the population is a general indicator not only of social policy, but also of the development of the economic system as a whole. The level of social well-being is the degree to which people are provided with material goods...

    Share with friends or save for yourself:

    Loading...