Exam criteria. Criteria for evaluating the Unified State Examination in literature. Biology, optional elective exam

Since 2001, many schoolchildren are familiar with a new type of exam - the Unified State Examination (Unified State Examination), despite the fact that its introduction into the system school education happened smoothly, they didn’t become less afraid of him. Future graduates are interested in questions about the number of upcoming exams, but also about the scores they should receive.

Unified State Examination scores

There are three types minimum points that students can receive based on the results of passing the Unified State Exam:

• The first type gives the right to receive a certificate;
• The second makes it possible to submit documents to higher educational institutions in the country;
• The third is sufficient for admission on a budgetary basis in a specific specialty at a specific university in the country.

It is not surprising that for many students, the Unified State Exam has become a rather strong emotional test; in fact, you shouldn’t stress yourself out too much before taking the exams, you need to prepare well and be confident in yourself. Despite all the rigor of the procedure, this is just an exam that can be retaken in case of failure. With proper training and approach, passing the Unified State Exam is not so difficult.

The Unified State Exam forms contain various tasks; they must be completed within a certain time; as they complete them, the student receives primary points; each subject has its own maximum values. When checking the level of knowledge, the primary scores are converted into final scores and they are entered into the certificate; they are the main ones for admission to a university.

Planned passing scores in 2018

There is still time before the exam, and many who wish can familiarize themselves with the passing scores in 2018, not only to know them, but also to be able to prepare for the Unified State Exam in advance.

Many universities announce in advance the score required for admission to the budget place, this allows you to realistically assess your chances of getting into the selected educational institution, as well as select the most suitable options. In 2018, no significant changes are expected when passing the Unified State Exam and entering a university; students can rely on the data of the previous year, so in 2017 for educational institutions of the capital the passing score was 80 - 90, for other cities the requirements are not so high and vary between 65 - 75 points.

Will there be changes in 2018?

At first glance, there is simply nothing to change in the education system, however, the level of education in our country is getting lower and lower every year, it is reasonable to conclude that it is time to change everything. It’s hard for everyone: students, their parents, and of course, teachers. The requirements are getting higher and higher every year; for many, the exam is stressful; some cannot cope with such pressure.

Today, mathematics and Russian are compulsory subjects, with plans to add more in 2018. Since 2009, compulsory exams have been held in subjects that are not only graduation from school, but also entrance to universities in our country. It is not surprising that there are plans to introduce history as another compulsory subject. It is planned to implement the plan in 2018 or 2019; in any case, the data will either be confirmed or refuted very soon.

Attitude to the Unified State Exam

Since 2001, the attitude towards the Unified State Exam is still relevant, some oppose its implementation, others defend it as progress in the education system, and there are those who do not emphasize it, continuing to study and teach.

“Against” the Unified State Exam

Similar materials

Every graduate who wants to become a student at one of the Russian universities in 2018 faces the difficult task of successfully passing the Unified State Exam, as well as choosing the right educational institution and faculty for submitting documents. Most 11th graders and their parents are faced with the final exam grading system for the first time and often find it difficult to find answers to the questions that arise. Therefore, we decided to shed light on important points.

In 2017-2018, the main rules passing the Unified State Exam will not be significantly changed. This means that the 100-point assessment system for final tests will still be relevant for graduates.

How is everything going?

During the inspection exam papers For each correctly completed task, the graduate receives so-called “primary points”, which upon completion of the work check are summed up and converted into a “test score”, which is indicated in the Unified State Examination certificate.

Important! Since 2009, the scale for converting primary and test scores of the Unified State Exam into the traditional five-point grades for schools has not been officially used, because in 2017 and 2018 the final exams are not included in the certificate.

Work verification is performed in two ways:

• automatically (using special programs and technical means);
• manually (the correctness of detailed answers is checked by two independent experts).

It is quite difficult to challenge the result of an automatic check. If the basic rules were not followed when filling out the answer table, the computer may not protect the result, and only the graduate himself will be to blame for this, for not following a number of mandatory rules.

If controversial issues arise during the expert review, a third specialist is involved, whose opinion will be decisive.

When can I expect results?

The following time frames apply by law:

• data processing (for compulsory subjects) in the RCIO should not last longer than 6 calendar days;
• RCIO is given 4 days to process data (elective subjects);
• verification at the Federal Testing Center should take no more than 5 working days;
• approval of results by the State Examination Commission - 1 more day;
• up to 3 days for distribution of results to Unified State Exam participants.

In practice, from the moment of passing the exam to receiving the official result, it can take from 8 to 14 days.

Converting Unified State Examination points into grades

Despite the fact that officially in 2018 the scale for transferring points according to Unified State Exam subjects is not used in the five-point assessment; many still want to interpret their result in a more familiar “school” system. To do this, you can use special tables or online calculators.

Table for converting OGE test scores into grades

The second method is a little simpler and more convenient than searching for the required values ​​in the cells of a huge table. You just need to choose a subject (mathematics, Russian language, chemistry, physics, history, English language, social studies... and other subjects), enter data and get the desired result in a matter of seconds.

We invite you to try how simple and convenient it is to use online calculators for the Unified State Exam score and its conversion into a 5-point score in practice.

Transferring points from primary to test

Converting Unified State Examination points into grades

Internet systems for applicants

The 2017-2018 academic year is completed, the exam has been passed, the results are known and even an interactive transfer scale primary points showed that Unified State Exam result located in a fairly good range... But is this enough to enter the desired university?

Assess the real chances of admission based on test scores and the minimum passing threshold set by the university.

Important! The minimum passing score is determined by the university itself. It will directly depend on the scores of applicants who apply in 2018. The more popular the specialty, the higher the passing score.

Often at TOP faculties, even 100-point results are not enough for admission to the budget. Only Olympiad winners who provide significant additional points have a chance to see their name on the list of applicants for such majors.

In 2018, the most popular services for selecting a university and monitoring the entrance score threshold for various specialties will be:

1. Ucheba.ru
2. Apply online
3. Calculator High school economy
4. Postyplenie.ru
5. Typical applicant

These services are very easy to find. Just enter their name into any search engine.

(with a detailed answer)

• Three questions were answered correctly - 2 points.
• Correct answers to any two questions - 1 point.
• Any one question is answered correctly. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 2

in social studies it is assessed:

• The explanation is given correctly and the answers to two questions are given - 2 points.
• Any two elements of the answer are given correctly - 1 point.
• Any one element of the answer is correct. OR OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 2

in social studies it is assessed:

• Two sources (paths) are correctly named and 2 examples are given (4 examples in total) - 3 points.
• Two sources (paths) are correctly named, any 2-3 examples are given - 2 points.
• One or two sources (paths) are correctly named, any 1 example is given. OR 1 source (path) is correctly named and 2 examples corresponding to it are given - 1 point.
• All answers that do not meet the above criteria for scoring 1, 2 and 3 points. OR Reasoning given general, which do not meet the requirements of the task. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social studies it is assessed:

• Three functions are correctly named and explained - 3 points.
• Two or three functions are correctly named, two of them are explained - 2 points.
• One to three functions are correctly named, one of them is explained. OR Only three functions are correctly named - 1 point.
• Only one or two functions are named correctly. OR Reasoning of a general nature is given that does not correspond to the requirements of the assignment. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social studies it is assessed:

25.1 Disclosure of the meaning of the concept - 2 points

• The explanation of the meaning / definition of the concept is given fully, clearly, clearly, unambiguously: the essential features related to the characteristic are indicated this concept/ distinguishing it from other concepts (the content of the concept is correctly revealed through the generic affiliation of the concept and its specific difference(s)) - 2 points.
• The meaning of the concept as a whole is disclosed, but incompletely: only one of the essential features related to the characteristics of this concept / distinguishing it from other concepts is indicated, OR the answer contains certain inaccuracies/shortcomings that do not distort its essence - 1 point.
• In the answer, along with the correct ones, incorrect signs are given (characteristics, descriptions, comparisons, etc.), distorting the content of the concept in essence. OR There are no specific characteristics or essential features of the concept / only non-essential features are indicated that do not reveal the meaning of the concept. OR Other situations not provided for by the rules for assigning 2 and 1 points - 0 points.

Assessment guidelines:

1. The following is not counted: – a characteristic of generic affiliation that repeats a concept, the meaning of which must be disclosed; - as essential characteristics a feature already contained in the wording of the task; – explanation of the meaning / definition of a concept through negation or only through the etymology of the word, metaphor or allegory.
2. If according to criterion 25.1 (disclosure of the meaning of the concept), 0 points are assigned, then according to criterion 25.2 0 points are assigned.

25.2 Availability and quality of sentences containing information about various aspects of the concept - 2 points

• Two sentences have been compiled, each of which contains information that is correct from the point of view of scientific social science about aspects of the concept that correspond to the requirements of the task - 2 points.
• One sentence has been compiled containing correct information from the point of view of scientific social science about any aspect of the concept in accordance with the requirement of the task - 1 point.
• - 0 points.

Assessment instructions:

The following are not included in the assessment:

• sentences containing essential errors that distort the meaning of the concept and/or its individual aspects;
• proposals that reveal relevant aspects at the everyday level, without involving social science knowledge;
• phrases, uncommon sentences.

Maximum score - 4

in social studies it is assessed:

• Three functions are correctly named and illustrated with examples - 3 points.
• Two or three functions are correctly named, two of them are illustrated with examples - 2 points.
• One to three functions are correctly named, one of them is illustrated with example(s) - 1 point.
• Only one to three functions are named correctly. OR Any number of examples are given without specifying functions. OR Reasoning of a general nature is given that does not correspond to the requirements of the assignment. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social studies it is assessed:

• The sphere, type of stratification and three criteria are correctly indicated - 3 points.
• The sphere, type of stratification and one or two criteria are correctly indicated. OR The scope and three criteria are correctly indicated - 2 points.
• The scope and type of stratification are correctly indicated. OR The scope and one or two criteria are correctly indicated - 1 point.
• Only the sphere is indicated correctly. OR The scope is not specified (specified incorrectly) regardless of the presence of other elements of the answer. OR Reasoning of a general nature is given that does not correspond to the requirements of the assignment. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social studies it is assessed:

28.1 Disclosure of the topic on its merits - 3 points

• A complex plan contains at least three points, including two points, the presence of which will reveal this topic essentially. Both of these “mandatory” points are detailed in subparagraphs that make it possible to reveal this topic in essence - 3 points.
• A complex plan contains at least three points, including two points, the presence of which will allow the topic to be covered in substance. Only one of these “mandatory” points is detailed in subparagraphs that allow the topic to be discussed in essence - 2 points.
• A complex plan contains at least three points, including only one point, the presence of which will allow the topic to be discussed in essence. This “mandatory” point is detailed in subparagraphs that allow the topic to be discussed in essence - 1 point.
• All other situations not covered by the rules for assigning 2 and 1 points. OR Cases when the graduate’s answer in form does not correspond to the requirements of the assignment (for example, it is not formatted in the form of a plan highlighting points and subpoints) - 0 points.

Assessment guidelines:

1. Items/subitems that are of an abstract and formal nature and do not reflect the specifics of the topic are not counted in the assessment.
2. If 0 points are assigned according to criterion 28.1, then 0 points are assigned according to criterion 28.2

28.2 Correctness of wording of points and sub-points of the plan - 1 point

• The wording of the points and sub-points of the plan is correct and does not contain errors or inaccuracies - 1
• All other situations 0

Maximum score - 4

in social studies it is assessed:

29.1 Revealing the meaning of the statement - 1 point.

• The meaning of the statement is revealed: one or more main ideas related to the content of the social science course are correctly identified, and/or one or more theses are formulated in the context of the statement, which requires justification - 1 point.
• The meaning of the statement is not revealed: not a single main idea is highlighted / not a single thesis is formulated. OR The highlighted idea, the formulated thesis do not reflect the meaning of the statement / the meaning of the statement has been replaced by reasoning of a general nature (“home preparation”) that does not reflect the specifics of the proposed statement. OR Disclosure of the meaning is replaced by a direct retelling / paraphrasing of the given statement / sequential explanation of each word in the statement without explaining the meaning of the statement as a whole - 0 points.

Assessment instructions:

• If according to criterion 29.1 (disclosure of the meaning of the statement), 0 points are assigned, then for all other evaluation criteria 0 points are assigned.

29.2 Theoretical content of the mini-essay - 2 points.

(explanation of key concept(s), presence and correctness of theoretical provisions)

• In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, correct explanations of the key concept(s) and theoretical provisions are given from the point of view of scientific social science (without errors) - 2 points.
• In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, explanations of the key concept(s) that are correct from the point of view of scientific social science (without errors) are given; theoretical positions are not presented. OR In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, theoretical provisions that are correct from the point of view of scientific social science (without errors) are presented, the meaning of the key concept(s) is not disclosed. OR In the given explanations of the key concept(s) / theoretical provisions, there are some inaccuracies that do not distort the scientific meaning of these concepts, theoretical provisions - 1 point.
• All other situations not provided for by the rules for assigning 2 and 1 points, including if there is no theoretical content of the mini-essay: the meaning of the key concept(s) is not explained, theoretical provisions are not given or are not related to the main idea/ thesis, do not reveal the meaning of the statement. OR Reasonings of an everyday nature are given without relying on social science knowledge - 0 points.

Assessment instructions:

• If 0 points are assigned according to criterion 29.2, then 0 points are assigned according to criterion 29.3.

29.3 Theoretical content of the mini-essay: presence and correctness of reasoning, conclusions - 1 point.

• In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis based on the correct explanation(s) of the key concept(s), theoretical provisions, interconnected consistent and consistent reasoning is presented, on the basis of which a well-founded and a reliable conclusion from the point of view of scientific social science - 1 point.
• All other situations, including reasoning and conclusions of an everyday nature without relying on social science knowledge - 0 points.

29.4 The quality of the facts and examples provided - 2 points.

• At least two correct, comprehensively formulated facts/examples are given from various sources that confirm the illustrated idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion and do not duplicate each other in content. There is a clear connection between each fact/example and the idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion given in the essay - 2 points.
• Only one correct, fully formulated fact/example is given that confirms the illustrated idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion. There is a clear connection between this fact/example and the idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion given in the essay. OR Correct, comprehensively formulated facts/examples are given from sources of the same type that confirm the illustrated idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion. There is a clear connection between each fact/example and the idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion given in the essay. OR Two examples are given from sources of different types, duplicating each other in content. There is a clear connection between each fact/example and the idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion given in the essay - 1 point.
• All other situations not covered by the rules for assigning 2 and 1 points
  0 - 0 points.

Assessment instructions:

Facts of social life (including media reports), personal social experience (including books read, films watched), materials from educational subjects (history, geography, etc.) can be used as sources.

1. Examples from different academic subjects are considered as examples from various sources
2. Facts/examples that contain factual and semantic errors that lead to a significant distortion of the essence of the statement or indicate a lack of understanding of the historical, literary, geographical and (or) other material used are not counted in the assessment.

Maximum score - 6

The Unified State Exam has long become a familiar annual practice for us, and for schoolchildren it has become a part of life. Starting from the 10th grade, future graduates intensively prepare for certification, focusing on the subjects they have chosen. In order to successfully pass the exam, in addition to careful preparation, you need to know all the requirements and follow the changes and innovations in the upcoming Unified State Exam. So, what's new in the Unified State Exam 2018?

This year, exam materials will be printed in schools themselves on the day of the exam. Forms and test materials are now single-sided and black and white. Accordingly, they need to be filled in on one side only.

As for the items themselves, changes have not passed here either. For example, in the Russian language exam, one task was added on knowledge lexical norms and the ability to see speech errors. The number of tasks has increased to 26, and the maximum primary score for completing all the work increased from 57 to 58.

The fourth topic of an essay on modern literature has been introduced. The maximum primary score for the work increased by 15 points at once - from 45 to 57, which indicates changes in the evaluation criteria. For tasks with a detailed answer (No. 9 and 16) you can get up to 10 points, and No. 8 and 15 - 5 points. Speech errors will be judged strictly.

Social studies also fell into the company of subjects that were not spared by innovations. Here, the changes affected the evaluation criteria for tasks 28 and 29. When preparing, emphasis should be placed on tasks with a logical relationship between concepts, since it was in the essay (task 29) that one point was added for logic. The maximum primary indicator increased from 62 to 64 points.

Those who have chosen physics as their major exam should focus on the basic concepts of the elements of astrophysics. A new task No. 24 has been added to the test part of CMMs, relating specifically to this section of physics. The maximum primary score for the entire work increased to 52.

The total number of chemistry tasks has also increased due to the addition of one new one of increased complexity in the second part. In assignments No. 30 and 31, the learned material on the topics “Redox reactions” and “Ion exchange reactions” will be tested. However, the maximum primary score is still 60, since the criteria for assessing the basic part of the Unified State Exam in chemistry have changed.

Finally, we will tell you about innovations in the upcoming Unified State Exam in computer science. Now in tasks 8, 11, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25 the code examples are written not in C, but in C++.

In all other subjects, there were no significant changes or innovations. Let us remind you that two subjects remain mandatory for graduates - Russian language and mathematics (basic for the certificate, specialized for admission to a university). No fluff!