Rogov, Evgeniy Ivanovich

Rogov Evgeniy Ivanovich

Department of Organizational and Applied Educational Psychology

Scientific degree: Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences

Position: professor

1. Education

1979 – graduated from Rostov state university, psychologist by specialty, psychology teacher.

1986 – graduated from graduate school at the Research Institute of General and educational psychology Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of the USSR (Moscow) with the defense of a dissertation for a candidate of psychological sciences in specialty 19.00.07 developmental and educational psychology.

1999 – defense of the dissertation of Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences “Personal and professional development of teachers in pedagogical activity" in specialty 13.00.08 "Theory and Methods vocational education».

2. Advanced training (over the last three years)

2.1. 2018, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "North Caucasus Federal University", training in the program "Use of electronic information and educational environment and information and communication technologies in the educational process", 72 hours

2.2. 2018, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "North Caucasus Federal University", training in the program "Providing first aid". 72 hours

2.3. 2018, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “Southern Federal University”, training in the program “Online learning technologies in teaching activities”, 72 hours

2.4. 2017, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "Southern Federal University", training in the program "Organizational and managerial foundations of inclusive vocational education", 72 hours;

2.5. 2016, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Chechen State Pedagogical University", training in the program "Activities of a university teacher in the context of modernization of teacher education";

2.6. 2015, State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Moscow City Psychological and Pedagogical University", training under the program "Program for advanced training of teaching staff and personnel of educational and methodological services in the design and implementation of basic professional educational programs Master's programs in the enlarged group of specialties "Education and Pedagogy" (direction of training: Psychological and Pedagogical Education), which involves increasing the research work and practice of students in network interaction with educational organizations at various levels", 72 hours.

3. Area of ​​scientific interests: Professional development and professional deformations of personality; Development of professional ideas in the process of professionalization of the subject; Studying psychology at school.

4. Disciplines taught: "Psychology professional development personalities"; “Motivation in management activities”; “Scientific research in professional activities of psychological and pedagogical directions”; " Social psychology in education."

5. Publications:

Total publications on elibrary – 141, citations 4856

H-index according to RSCI - 10 (according to the core of RSCI-1)

Scientific publications over the past 5 years:

IN magazines Web of Science And Scopus

1. Zheldochenko L.D., Rogov E.I. INFLUENCE OF THE OBJECT OF PEDAGOGICAL ACTIVITY ON CHANGES IN PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A TEACHER: DESTRUCTIVE ASPECT. // Russian psychological journal. 2016. T. 13. No. 2. P. 102-114.
2. Rogov E.I., Rogova E.E. Professional ideas as factor of attitude towards performed activity // . 2015, Pages 233-242

In journals included in the current list of the Higher Attestation Commission

1. Gabardasheva Z.I., Rogov E.I. FEATURES OF A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE LEVEL OF PERSONAL PROFESSIONALISM IN REPRESENTATIVES OF HUMANITARIAN PROFESSIONS // News of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical sciences. 2017. No. 4. P. 81-90.

2. Rogov E.I. PROBLEMS OF PROFESSIONALIZATION OF STUDENTS' SELF-AWARENESS AT UNIVERSITY // News of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical sciences. 2017. No. 8. pp. 59-66.

3. Rogov E.I. FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL SELF-AWARENESS AT UNIVERSITY: CONTENT AND EVALUATION // News of Saratov University. New series. Acmeology of education. Developmental psychology. 2017. T. 6. No. 4. P. 307-311.

4. Gabardasheva Z.I., Rogov E.I. THE ROLE OF THE SUBJECT OF ACTIVITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONALISM OF STUDENTS OF HUMANITIES FACULTIES//World of Science. 2017. T. 5. No. 2. P. 7.

5. Rogov E.I. MULTI-DIRECTIONALITY OF APPROACHES TO THE CONTENT AND CRITERIA FOR THE FORMATION OF A STUDENT'S PROFESSIONAL SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS AT A UNIVERSITY//World of Science. 2017. T. 5. No. 4. P. 31.

6. Rogov E.I., Moiseenko O.S. RELATIONSHIP OF THE PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL ORIENTATION OF FUTURE TEACHERS WITH THEIR PERCEPTIONS ABOUT THE PROFESSION//News of the Volgograd State University pedagogical university. 2016. No. 8 (112). pp. 69-76.

7. Zheldochenko L.D., Rogov E.I. INFLUENCE OF THE OBJECT OF PEDAGOGICAL ACTIVITY ON CHANGES IN PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A TEACHER: DESTRUCTIVE ASPECT//Russian psychological journal. 2016. T. 13. No. 2. P. 102-114.

8. Rogov E.I., Moiseenko O.S. PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF NETWORK INTERACTION OF EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS DURING THE CREATION OF A DISTRICT CLUSTER // News of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical sciences. 2016. No. 6. P. 71-77.

9. Rogov E.I. SELF-EFFICACY AS A FACTOR OF PROFESSIONALIZATION OF HUMANITIES STUDENTS // News of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical sciences. 2016. No. 8. pp. 71-78.

10. Rogov E.I., Moiseenko O.S. PROFESSIONAL VIEWS OF TEACHERS ABOUT NETWORK INTERACTION IN EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS//World of Science. 2016. T. 4. No. 3. P. 2.

11. Rogov E.I., Finaeva Yu.S. VIEWS ABOUT THE FUTURE PROFESSION OF STUDENTS WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF PEDAGOGICAL ORIENTATION // World of Science. 2016. T. 4. No. 3. P. 20.

12. Rogov E.I., Gorbatykh A.V. DYNAMICS OF ASSESSMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF HUMANITIES STUDENTS WITH DIFFERENT LEVEL OF SELF-EFFICACY//World of Science. 2016. T. 4. No. 4. P. 24.

13. Rogov E.I. INADEQUACY OF PROFESSIONAL IMPLICATIONS ABOUT THE OBJECT OF ACTIVITY AS THE BASIS OF PROFESSIONAL DEFORMATIONS OF A TEACHER // Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University. 2015. No. 5. P. 92-101.

14. Rogov E.I., Zheldochenko L.D. THE ROLE OF PROFESSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS IN THE FORMATION OF THE TRAJECTORY OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT // News of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical sciences. 2015. No. 12. P. 107-112. 11

15. Rogov E.I. CONCEPTUAL APPROACH TO SYSTEMATIZATION OF PROFESSIONAL DEFORMATIONS // News of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical sciences. 2015. No. 2. P. 48-54.

16. Rogov E.I., Simonchik T.V. FEATURES OF PROFESSIONAL PERSPECTIVES OF ADDICTED TEENS IN EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OF DIFFERENT TYPES // News of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical sciences. 2015. No. 8. P. 101-109.

17. Rogov E.I., Zholudeva S.V., Antonova A.O. FEATURES OF PROFESSIONAL PERCEPTIONS AND PERCEPTIONS OF SUCCESS IN TECHNICAL STUDENTS // Engineering Bulletin of the Don. 2015. No. 3 (37). P. 190. 1

18. Rogov E.I. FEATURES OF PERCEPTIONS ABOUT ACTIVITY IN THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE SUBJECT // News of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical sciences. 2014. No. 10. P. 39-51.

19. Rogov E.I. PROFESSIONALS AND AMATEURS: PSYCHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF FUNCTIONING // News of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical sciences. 2014. No. 2. P. 28-36.

20. Rogov E.I., Simchenko A.N. THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL PERCEPTIONS ABOUT ACTIVITY ON THE FEATURES OF ITS IMPLEMENTATION // News of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical sciences. 2013. No. 2. P. 059-066.

1. Rogov E.I., Zaplatnikova M.B. THE ROLE OF PATIENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT THE TREATMENT ACTIVITY IN THE FORMATION OF RELATIONSHIPS TO THE DOCTOR AND THE DISEASE // News of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical sciences. 2013. No. 9. P. 097-108.

Monographs:

1. Rogov E.I. and others. Phenomenology and typology of professional interaction of a teacher. - Rostov-on-Don: RGPI, 1990.
2. Rogov E.I. and others. Pedagogical interaction: psychological aspect. - M.: Publishing House of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of the USSR, 1990.
3. Rogov E.I. and others. Rating as an indicator of professional development of a teacher. - Rostov-on-Don: RGPI, 1991.
4. Rogov E.I. Professional activities children's psychological center. - Mines: Printer, 1993.
5. Rogov E.I. Personality in teaching activities. - Rostov n/d: RGPU, 1994.
6. Rogov E.I. Teacher's personality: theory and practice. - Rostov n/a: Phoenix, 1996.
7. Rogov E.I. The teacher as an object of psychological research. - M.: "Vlados", 1998.
8. Rogov E.I. and others. Reasons for the spread and ways to prevent drug addiction. - Rostov-on-Don: RGPU, 2001.
9. Rogov E.I. Don psychological school: theory and reality. - Rostov-on-Don: RGPU, 2002.
10. Rogov E.I. and others. Personality formation in the development environment of an innovative school. - Pyatigorsk: PSLU, 2006.
11. Rogov E.I. and others. Professional ideas: theory and reality. / Edited by E.I. Rogova. - Rostov-on-Don: IPO PI SFU, 2008.
12. Rogov E.I. and others. Modern paradigm for the study of professional ideas. /Edited by E.I. Rogov. - Rostov-on-Don: Foundation for the Development of Science and Education, 2014.
13. Rogov E.I. etc. Current trends development of labor psychology and organizational psychology. / Edited by L.G. Dika - M.: Publishing House "Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences", 2015.
14. Rogov E.I. and others. Professional deformations in teaching activities. - Rostov-on-Don; KIBI MEDIA CENTER SFedU, 2015.
15. Rogov E.I. Psychology of the formation of professionalism. - Rostov-on-Don; KIBI MEDIA CENTER SFedU, 2015.

6. Scientific, pedagogical and organizational and managerial activities

• Dean of the Faculty of Psychology, Rostov State Pedagogical University (1994-2002);
• Head of the Department of Social Psychology, Russian State Pedagogical University (2000-2006);
• Head of the Department of Organizational and applied psychology» SFU (2006-2015);
• director of master's programs: “Organizational psychology in education”, “Professional coach: coaching in education”:
• currently heads the ISTOK REC “Research modern technologies in education and career”, where in addition to conducting scientific research continuing education programs are being implemented for managers, psychologists, and specialists educational institutions various types and types:
• "Basics HR - psychology"(professional retraining program of 520 hours);
• « Theoretical foundations of organizational psychology"(advanced training program of 144 hours);
• « Application Basics HR - psychology"(advanced training program of 180 hours)
• « Cases HR - manager"(advanced training program of 196 hours)
• "Employment Psychology"(program additional education volume 32 hours)

7. Scientific activities within the framework of received grants:

7.1. 2014 - 2015 FCPRO (templan) project “Modern competency-based paradigm for the study of professional ideas, communicative abilities of an individual as a means of advanced training in socially oriented professions within various linguistic cultures.”

7.2. 2012-2013 Federal Center for Professional Education (templan) project “Comprehensive study of professional ideas as a means of increasing competence in socially oriented professions”;

7.3. 2008-2011 FCPRO (templan) project “Dynamics of professional ideas during the period of social transformations”;

7.4. 2007-2008 main competition of the Russian Humanitarian Foundation, the project “Dynamics of ideas about the object of activity in professional genesis”;

Reviewers:

A. O. Prokhorov, Doctor of Psychology (Kazan State Pedagogical University);

A. D. Alferov, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences (Rostov State Pedagogical University)

The textbook provides a system of diagnostic and correctional techniques that have become “classical” in the educational field and are used by most domestic school psychologists when working with children and adolescents.

The manual is intended for psychologists social educators, psychiatrists and those interested in their activities.

PREFACE

Social activity, morality, and the realization of individual abilities are the main tasks of education, the success of which largely depends on the direction and pace of reforms in school life. One of the problems facing teachers is the psychological and pedagogical dualism in relation to the developing personality - training and education are not always based on knowledge about the psychology of the child’s development and the formation of his personality.

Each schoolchild has only one inherent characteristics of cognitive activity, emotional life, will, character, each requires individual approach, which the teacher, for various reasons, cannot always implement. Even specially developed psychological recommendations turn out to be ineffective due to existing professional barriers and the low quality of professional psychological training of teachers. The result of this situation was the certification of schools and teachers without taking into account psychological characteristics schoolchildren, their level of mental development.

Nevertheless, practical educational psychology, in spite of everything, continues to develop. Psychological services are emerging in various institutions that are optimistically tackling the most difficult problems.

The work of a psychologist at school allows you to delve more thoroughly into school life and contribute as much as possible to the development of the growing personality. However, this process is not going smoothly. Not all schools were able to hire a psychologist on their staff due to economic reasons. Many problems have also accumulated in the structures designed to eliminate “psychological gaps” in schools. Thus, numerous faculties, accelerated courses for the training and retraining of child psychologists, giving only general theoretical information, do not shape the psychological thinking of former teachers. Therefore, in practical activities, child psychologists, having mastered abstractly generalized concepts and methods, experience great difficulties when applying them in a real institution, in an established team, in relation to a specific individual.

Current page: 1 (book has 22 pages total) [available reading passage: 15 pages]

Evgeniy Ivanovich Rogov

Human psychology

Preface

Methodological manuals in the “ABC of Psychology” series were developed and tested as part of the “Don Psychological School” experiment. The idea of ​​the experiment arose after studying and analyzing the needs and capabilities of schoolchildren. Our experience shows that training programs can be significantly updated through the introduction of disciplines of the psychological and pedagogical cycle. When retained for security purposes general education The basic component of the state curriculum provides for additional and elective classes for students, as well as work on individual plans. A significant amount of the integrated course requires allocation of 3 hours in the 10th grade and 4 hours in the 11th grade. Time for studying psychology is allocated within the framework of the basic curriculum through its variable part and electives included in the schedule of compulsory classes. The variable part of the curriculum is used with the following weekly schedule:

Full course involves studying the following disciplines:

1st-4th grades – “The ABCs of Psychology”;

5th grade – “Human cognitive activity”;

6th grade – “Basics of self-regulation”;

7th grade – “Psychology of communication”;

8th grade – “Ethics and psychology of family life”;

9th grade – “Basics of career guidance and choice of profession”;

10th grade – “Personality Psychology”;

11th grade – “Fundamentals of social psychology.”

The specificity of psychological disciplines and the number of hours allocated to them require an increase total number lessons per week compared to the current curriculum. However, the use of advanced technologies and intensification of the learning process can reduce lesson time by 5 minutes. Since the practical part of psychology classes is aimed at reducing stress and fatigue, increasing the number of lessons should not affect the health of children.

In the content of continuous psychological training of students, 3 leading levels are clearly visible: introductory (grades 1-6), adaptation (grades 7-9) and basic (grades 10-11). This allows you to refuse special training, a kind of training of children for a specific profession and instead provide schoolchildren with the opportunity to choose from a wide range of “human-human” professions. In addition, it creates real basis for the formation of the best human qualities in students, the development of organizational and communication abilities, which is necessary for any civilized person.

The training program in a specialized psychological class at the 2nd level of complexity involves a two-year cycle, which allows students to purposefully prepare students for the activities of assistant psychologists, followed by passing a qualifying exam and receiving a certificate.

Entry of high school students into various types The work of a psychologist includes both general pedagogical actions, characteristic of all relevant professions, and specific ones, requiring special knowledge, skills, abilities and personal qualities.

In specialized psychological classes they use active methods training: trainings, role-playing and business games. IN syllabus educational excursions to the city psychological center, social protection centers, meetings with university psychology teachers and psychologists have been introduced.

When characterizing the prospects for psychological education in school, it is necessary to emphasize the possibility of psychologizing the content of everything educational process. We are talking, for example, about the fact that psychology (its influence will certainly grow) should “work” not only in its traditionally close literature, biology, but also in music or painting. Thus, psychology can act as an important integrating factor, and for very distant from each other educational areas.

The counter movement also seems promising - the inclusion of elements in the psychological content educational material from other subject and educational areas, such as history. In this sense, we can talk not only about the psychologization of, say, the humanities, but also about the expanded humanitarization of psychological disciplines.

The process of psychologization can be accelerated with the help of an appropriate organization of psychological practice, within which it is necessary to provide individual tasks for those who are more interested in computer diagnostics (“person-to-technology”) or counseling (“person-to-person”), the study of an individual or a group etc. It is more expedient and pedagogically justified to give students the right to independently choose from this set those disciplines that they need to master.

The entire amount of time allocated to psychology should not exceed 30% of the total number of hours provided for by the curriculum.

Thus, the model we propose for the psychological preparation of a developing personality can be built both on the principle of hierarchical subordination of disciplines and on the basis of the transition from the general to the specific. It should be noted that the books in the “ABC of Psychology” series can be used by psychologists in educational institutions not only as a set, but also individually, taking into account the age capabilities of schoolchildren.

PERSON OR PERSON?

Adult dictionary

Act – form of manifestation of the subject's activity.

Psychological protection – a special regulatory system of personality stabilization, aimed at eliminating or minimizing the feeling of anxiety associated with awareness of the conflict.

Individuality – a person characterized by his socially significant differences from other people.

Introspection – a method of understanding mental phenomena through introspection, i.e., a person’s careful study of what is happening in his mind when solving various kinds of problems.

Cognitive Psychology – one of the modern areas of research in psychology, which explains human behavior based on knowledge and studies the process and dynamics of its formation.

Personality – the individual as a subject of social relations and conscious activity.

Personal meaning - subjective attitude of the individual to objects and phenomena of the surrounding reality.

Worldview – a system of views on the objective world and man’s place in it, on man’s relationship to the reality around him and to himself.

Psycholinguistics – a field of science bordering between psychology and linguistics that deals with the study of human speech, its occurrence and functioning.

Personal self-determination – conscious act of identifying and affirming own position in problematic situations.

Self-esteem - a person’s assessment of himself, his capabilities, qualities and place among other people.

Status – a person's position in a group that determines his rights and responsibilities.

Structure – a set of stable connections between many components of an object, ensuring its integrity and identity to itself.

Subject – an individual or a group of people as a source of knowledge and transformation of reality.

Test – a system of tasks that allows you to measure the level of development of a certain psychological quality of an individual.

Personality Traits – stable characteristics of an individual’s behavior that are repeated in various situations.

General concept of personality

What does the word "personality" mean? What meaning do we put into it? This word has its own history. Originally the Latin word "persona" (personality) meant a mask worn by an actor. The word “mask” had the same meaning among buffoons. IN Ancient Rome persons were citizens responsible before the law. IN academic dictionary 1847 it was said that personality is, “firstly, the relationship of one person to another, no personality should be tolerated in the service; secondly, a caustic comment on someone’s account, an insult. Personalities should not be used."

In accordance with the second interpretation, A.S. Pushkin used the word “personality”:

Other swearing, of course, is indecency,

You can’t write: so-and-so is an old man,

Goat with glasses, ugly slanderer,

Both angry and mean: all this will be a personality.

A.N. Radishchev used this word in a slightly different meaning: “Do you know what your peculiarity, your personality, what you are depends on?”

IN modern science The concept of “personality” is one of the most important categories. It is not purely psychological and is studied by history, philosophy, economics, pedagogy and other sciences. In this regard, the question arises about the peculiarities of the approach to personality in psychology.

The most important task of psychological science is to discover those psychological properties that characterize the individual and personality. A person is already born into the world as a human being. The structure of the body of a newborn baby allows him to master upright posture in the future, the structure of the brain allows him to develop intelligence, the structure of the hand provides the prospect of using tools, etc. With all these capabilities, a baby differs from a young animal. This confirms the fact that the baby belongs to to the human race. This relationship is fixed in the concept of “individual” - in contrast to a baby animal, which is called an individual from birth to the end of its life.

The concept of “individual” expresses the gender identity of a person, i.e. any person is an individual. But, being born as an individual, a person acquires a special social quality, he becomes a person. Philosophical definition personality was given by K. Marx. He defined the essence of man as a set of social relations. It is possible to understand what a person is only through the study of real social connections and relationships into which a person enters. The social nature of the individual always has a specific historical content.

It is from the specific socio-historical relations of a person that it is necessary to derive not only the general conditions of development, but also the historically specific essence of the individual. Specifics social conditions a person’s life and way of activity determines the characteristics of his individual qualities and properties. Personal characteristics are also not given to a person from birth. All people adopt certain mental traits, attitudes, customs and feelings in the society in which they live. Sometimes a person is understood as a closed, spiritual entity independent of the world, inaccessible to scientific research methods. However, personality cannot be reduced only to a set of arbitrarily selected internal mental properties and qualities, and cannot be isolated from objective conditions, connections and relationships with the outside world.

Along with the concept of “personality,” the concept of “individuality” is often used. What is human individuality? The personality of each person is endowed only with his own inherent combination of traits and characteristics that form his individuality. Thus, individuality is a combination psychological characteristics a person, which determine his uniqueness, originality, difference from other people. Individuality is manifested in certain character traits, temperament, habits, prevailing interests, in the qualities of cognitive processes, in abilities, in individual style activities. Just as the concepts of “individual” and “personality” are not identical, personality and individuality, in turn, form unity, but not identity. If personality traits are not represented in the system of interpersonal relationships, they turn out to be insignificant for personality assessment and do not receive conditions for development. Therefore, a person’s individual characteristics do not manifest themselves in any way until they become necessary in the system of interpersonal relationships. So, individuality is only one aspect of a person’s personality.

The relationship between biological and social in personality

The fact that the concepts of “personality” and “individuality” do not coincide does not allow us to imagine the structure of personality only in the form of some set of human properties and qualities. Indeed, if a person always acts as the subject of his relationships with people around him, his structure should also include these relationships and connections that develop in activity and communication. The structure of a person's personality is broader than the structure of his individuality. Therefore, data obtained from personality research cannot be directly transferred to personality characteristics.

The central place in psychological science is the problem of the relationship in the development of the individual biological and social. In the history of science, almost all possible relationships between the concepts of “mental”, “social” and “biological” have been considered. Mental development was interpreted in different ways: either as a completely spontaneous process, independent of either biological development or social development; then as a process derived either from biological development or from social; either as a result of a parallel action on the individual, biological and social, or as a product of their interaction.

Let's look at these theories in a little more detail.

So, according to the concepts spontaneous mental development Personal development is completely determined by its internal laws. The question of the biological and social simply does not exist for these concepts: the human body here, at best, is assigned the role of a kind of “container” mental activity, something external to the latter.

In concepts that are based on laws of biology, mental development is considered as linear function organism, as something that definitely follows this development. Here they try to derive all the features of mental processes, states and properties of a person from biological laws. In this case, laws discovered in the study of animals are often used, which do not take into account the specifics of the development of the human body. Often in these concepts, to explain mental development, the basic biogenetic law is used - the law of recapitulation. According to this law, the development of an individual repeats in its main features the evolution of the species to which it belongs. Scientists who adhere to this direction are trying to find in the mental development of an individual a repetition of the stages of the evolutionary process as a whole, or at least the main stages of the development of the species.

Similar ideas are found in sociological concepts mental development of the individual. Only here it appears a little differently. It is argued that the mental development of an individual in a summary form reproduces the main stages of the process historical development society, primarily the development of its spiritual life and culture.

Of course, if you wish, you can see some external similarities here. However, it does not provide grounds for concluding that the principle of recapitulation is valid in relation to human mental development. Such concepts are a typical case of unlawful expansion of the scope of biogenetic law.

The content of such concepts is expressed most clearly in the works of V. Stern. He believes that the principle of recapitulation should cover both the evolution of the animal psyche and history spiritual development society. To illustrate, here is one quote: “The human individual in the first months of infancy, with a predominance of lower feelings, with an unreflective reflexive and impulsive existence, is in the stage of a mammal; in the second half of the year, having developed the activity of grasping and versatile imitation, he reaches the development of a higher mammal-ape and in the second year, having mastered vertical gait and speech - the elementary human condition. In the first five years of play and fairy tales, he stands on the level of primitive peoples. This is followed by entry into school, a more intense integration into a social whole with certain responsibilities - an ontogenetic parallel to the entry of a person into its state and economic organizations. In the first school years, the simple content of the ancient and Old Testament world is most adequate to the child’s spirit; the middle years bear the features of fanaticism of Christian culture, and only in the period of maturity is spiritual differentiation achieved, corresponding to the state of culture of modern times.” Despite the complexity of this passage, the stages that a person goes through from the moment of birth are quite clear:

– lower mammals;

– higher mammals;

– primitive man;

– the birth of statehood;

– ancient world;

– Christian culture;

– modern culture.

Of course, one can discern some similarities and repetitions in the development of the individual and in the history of society. However, they do not allow us to reveal the essence of human mental development. When making such analogies, one cannot fail to take into account the system of training and education, which develops historically in every society and has its own characteristics in each socio-historical formation. The laws of development of society and the laws of development of the individual in society are different laws. The connection between them is much more complex than it seems from the standpoint of the law of recapitulation.

Each generation of people finds society at a certain stage of its development and is included in the system of social relations that exists. He does not need to repeat in any condensed form the entire previous history of mankind. In addition, by being included in the system of established social relations, each individual acquires and assimilates in this system certain rights and responsibilities, a social position, which are not similar to the functions and positions of other people. The cultural development of an individual begins with mastering the culture of that time and the community to which he belongs. The entire development of an individual is subject to a special order of laws.

At the same time, it is obvious that a person is born as a biological being. His body is a human body, and his brain is a human brain. In this case, the individual is born biologically, and even more so socially, immature and helpless. The maturation and development of the human body from the very beginning takes place in social conditions, which inevitably leave a strong imprint on these processes. The laws of maturation and development of the human body manifest themselves in a specific way, unlike in animals. The task of psychology is to reveal the laws of biological development of the human individual and the features of their action in the conditions of his life in society. For psychology it is especially important to find out the relationship of these laws with the laws of mental development of the individual.The biological development of an individual is the basis, the initial prerequisite for his mental development. But these prerequisites are realized in a certain society, in the social actions of the individual. The development of an individual does not begin from scratch, not from scratch. The old idea about its original basis as a “tabula raza” (a blank sheet on which life writes its letters) is not confirmed by science. A person is born with a certain set of biological properties and physiological mechanisms, which act as such a basis. The entire fixed system of properties and mechanisms is a common starting premise further development of the individual, ensuring his universal readiness for development, including mental development.

It would be too simple to imagine the matter in such a way that biological properties and the mechanisms perform some functions only at the initial stage of mental development, and then disappear. The development of an organism is a constant process, and these properties and mechanisms always play the role of a general prerequisite for mental development. Thus, the biological determinant operates throughout the life of an individual, although in different ways at different periods.

Psychology has now accumulated a lot of data that reveals the characteristics of sensations, perception, memory, thinking and other processes during different periods of human development. Scientists have proven that mental processes develop only in human activity and in the course of his communication with other people. In order to identify the laws governing human mental development, it is necessary to know how the biological support of developing mental processes changes. Without studying the biological development of the organism, it is difficult to understand the actual laws of the psyche. We are talking about the development of that highly organized matter, the property of which is the psyche. It is clear, of course, that the brain as the basis of the psyche does not develop on its own, but in the real life of a person. The most important aspects of development are the mastery of historically established methods of activity and methods of communication, the development of knowledge and skills, etc.

The prominent Russian psychologist B.F. Lomov devoted a lot of work to solving the problem of the relationship between the social and biological in personality. His views boil down to the following main points. When studying the development of an individual, psychology is not limited to the analysis of individual mental functions and states. First of all, she is interested in the formation and development of a person’s personality. In this regard, the problem of the relationship between the biological and the social appears primarily as a problem of the organism and the individual. The first of these concepts - “organism” - was formed in the context of biological sciences, the second concept, “personality”, is social. However, both of them treat the individual as a representative of the species “homo sapiens” and as a member of society. At the same time, each of these concepts captures different human properties. In the concept of “organism” - the structure of the human body as biological system, in the concept of “personality” – a person’s involvement in the life of society. As noted above, Russian psychology considers personality as a social quality of an individual. This quality does not exist outside of society. About a person who lives and develops outside human society, one cannot say that he is a person. Therefore, the concept of “personality” cannot be revealed outside of the “individual-society” relationship. The basis for the formation of an individual’s personal properties is the system of social relations in which he lives and develops.

In a broader sense, the formation and development of a personality can be considered as its assimilation of social programs that have developed in a given society at a given historical stage. It should be emphasized that this process is directed by society with the help of special systems, primarily upbringing and education systems.

From all of the above we can conclude: The development of an individual is complex, systemic and highly dynamic. It necessarily includes both social and biological determinants. Attempts to present a personality as the sum of two parallel or interconnected series are a very gross simplification that distorts the essence of the matter. Regarding the connections between the biological and the mental, it is hardly advisable to try to formulate some universal principle that is valid for all cases. These connections are multifaceted and multifaceted. Under some circumstances, the biological acts in relation to the mental as its mechanism, under others – as its prerequisite. Under some conditions, the content of mental reflection plays a role, under some conditions it plays the role of a factor influencing mental development, or the cause of individual acts of behavior. The biological can also be a condition for the emergence of mental phenomena, etc.

The connections between the mental and the social are even more diverse and multifaceted. This makes it very difficult to study the triadic structure of biological-mental-social. The relationship between the social and the biological in the human psyche is multidimensional and multi-level. It is determined by the specific circumstances of the mental development of the individual and develops differently at different stages of this process.

Let us now return to the question of the psychological essence of personality. To characterize what a personality is precisely in its meaningful psychological terms has turned out to be a difficult task for science. The solution to this issue has its own history.

The first textbook provides a system of diagnostic and correctional techniques that have become classic in the educational field and are used by most domestic school psychologists when working with children and adolescents.

The second book of the textbook contains diagnostic techniques that are most often used by domestic psychologists when working with adults - teachers and parents. The book also includes a set of corrective techniques and exercises necessary in the work of a psychologist in the educational field.

INTRODUCTION

IN lately A structural approach has become traditional in the work of child psychologists, within which personal and individual parameters, batteries of research methods, interpersonal relationships etc. Attempts to consider mental properties as material-structural, more characteristic of the vulgar-materialistic approach, were not successful, since the inner world of the individual is not accessible to direct observation and can only be revealed through scientific analysis of the systems to which a person belongs. Therefore, it is quite appropriate to consider the work of school psychologists through the prism systematic approach.

We can distinguish two main signs of systematic views: systemic terminology, which embodies systemic constructions of thought, and the meaningful completeness of displaying an object as a system within the framework of a given area of ​​research. System terminology - system, element, structure, connection, etc. — provides a certain clarity and uniformity of the description form, organizing the researcher’s thoughts accordingly. However, this does not guarantee the system will work. In this regard, it is necessary to introduce a meaningful sign of systematicity - the meaningful completeness of displaying the object being studied as a system. As noted by SL. Rubinstein, human existence is characterized by multifacetedness and multilayeredness; to reveal all the wealth inner world of a person and determine the characteristics of his psyche, it is necessary to consider the totality of systems that form the existence of a person and are the foundations of his qualities.

According to the systems approach, B.F. Lomov emphasized, any phenomenon arises and exists within the framework of a certain (sufficiently large) system of phenomena. It is important that the connections between the phenomena that belong to a given system do not act as episodic and random interactions, but are essential conditions for the emergence, existence and development of each of them, and at the same time the system as a whole. A person’s belonging to various systems is one way or another manifested in his psychological qualities. The plurality of bases for these qualities gives rise to their diversity and versatility.

Since the activities of a psychologist are largely aimed at solving specific problems with which students, their parents or teachers come to him, the main goal psychological service in general, it can be considered the promotion of mental health, educational interests and the disclosure of the individuality of the socializing individual, the correction of various kinds of difficulties in its development. The systematic work of a psychologist is ensured as follows. Firstly, the psychologist considers the student’s personality as complex system, which has different directions of manifestations (from the individual’s own internal activity to participation in various groups that have a certain influence on him). Secondly, the methodological tools used by psychological service workers also follow the logic of a systematic approach and are aimed at identifying all aspects and qualities of a student in order to help his development.

In the most general form, diagnostic, advisory and correctional work Students must be dealt with at five critical levels.

1. The psychophysiological level shows the formation of the components that make up the internal physiological and psychophysiological basis of all systems of the developing subject.
2. The individual psychological level determines the development of the basic psychological systems (cognitive, emotional, etc.) of the subject.
3. The personal level expresses the specific characteristics of the subject himself as an integral system, his difference from similar subjects at a given stage of development.
4. The microgroup level shows the peculiarities of interaction of a developing subject as an integral system with other subjects and their associations.
5. The social level determines the forms of interaction of the subject with broader social associations and society as a whole.

In addition, the system of work of the psychological service should include various types of work with the staff of educational institutions (joint comprehensive research, consultations, seminars, etc.), aimed not only at increasing the psychological competence of teachers, but also at overcoming the isolation of the school from real life. The need for this form of work is also caused by the need to avoid turning the psychological service into an “ambulance” or an “order desk” that performs only assigned tasks, so that the psychologist can master psychological situation at school, he himself determined the prospects for his development, strategy and tactics of interaction with various groups of students and individuals.