Annual report on the work of the department. Report on the work of the department. General characteristics of the department

In any university, in the process of learning, students need to undergo an internship in order to consolidate their theoretical knowledge and gain practical work skills. For the entire period of study, they undergo introductory (educational) and pre-diploma practice. The completion of the internship requires writing a report, which is accompanied by a diary and a description from the place of internship. To write a practice report yourself, you need to know the features of each type of practice.

Educational or fact-finding practice becomes the first test for students. It is passed on the 1st or 2nd course. The goal is to consolidate the general theoretical knowledge gained in the course of study, as well as to obtain a general idea of ​​the chosen specialty. During the internship, students are given the opportunity to get acquainted with the work of the enterprise through lectures and excursions, as well as see the work of employees of your chosen specialization.

Internship takes place in the 3-4 course and is the next step in mastering the profession. Interns are given the opportunity to study the work of the enterprise from the inside under the supervision of a curator, study and analyze documentation, and collect materials.

Undergraduate practice is the final stage of learning. Based on the information received at the enterprise, it will be necessary. Report on undergraduate practice often is the second chapter of the diploma and is an analysis of the work of the enterprise.

The report on the work of the enterprise must comply with the requirements of the practice program of your university (See also:), as a rule, it contains:

- calendar plan;

- a diary;

- a description from the place of internship

— introduction;

- the main part;

- conclusion;

- bibliography;

- applications

Title page drawn up according to the model from the methodological instructions. The title page contains data on the name of the university, the type of practice (educational, introductory, industrial, undergraduate), the topic of practice, specialty, student, leader, place and year of writing.

Title page sample

Calendar plan is drawn up in the form of a table, contains data on the type, timing and place of work performed by you at the enterprise. Sometimes included in the diary.

An example of a practice report schedule

Practice Diary- similar to the calendar plan. The diary is the main document, along with the report, according to which the student reports on the implementation of the practice program.

The trainee writes down every day what he did or studied today. Arranges everything in the form of a table.

An example of filling out a practice diary

Characteristic from the place of industrial, educational or diploma practice should reflect data on the knowledge, skills and abilities of the trainee. About the level of his professional training, personal qualities, as well as about the work and assignments that the student performed during his visit to the enterprise. And, of course, the recommended rating.

The student must receive a characteristic from his supervisor and attach to the report. But in practice, the leader shifts this responsibility to the student.

Sample characteristics from the place of internship

Sample Practice Report Content

Introduction contains:

• information about the place of internship;
• its goals and objectives, which are indicated in the guidelines;
• object and subject of research;
• assessment of the current state of the topic under study;
• may contain the expected results of the internship.

Introduction Example

Main part is divided into chapters. Contains theoretical and practical parts. The practical part describes the structure and activities of the enterprise. Analysis is underway. The positive and negative aspects of the work of an enterprise or institution are identified. All calculations, graphs and tables are given.

Conclusion written on the basis of the studied material. Contains answers to the tasks set in the introduction. Includes all conclusions obtained in the main part. You can include an assessment of your own work and give recommendations for improving the activities of the enterprise.

Practice Report Conclusion Sample

Bibliography contains all the sources used in writing the work, including those specified in . according to methodical instructions or GOST. It can include the names of documents received from the enterprise, as well as regulatory literature, Internet sources.

Applications include any data that can be referred to when writing the work, in the text of the work. It could be reporting organizational structure enterprises, extracts from legislation, questionnaires, drawings, diagrams, tables. Everything, the documents that you found at the enterprise and which were useful for writing the reporting work.

Writing a practice report on your own is very interesting and informative. But if you have any difficulties with writing or you did not manage to complete an internship at the enterprise, you can always turn to our specialists for help and get qualified advice.

Ministry of Education and Science Russian Federation

Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution

higher professional education

Moscow State University the woods"

"APPROVE"

Department head

Assoc. Korotkov S.A.

(signature) (full name)
Minutes of the meeting of the department No. ____

dated "___" _______________ 201_

Report

about the work of the department
arboriculture and forest harvesting

(name of the department)
for 2014/2015 academic year

Mytishchi 2015

Content

1. general characteristics departments

The Department of Forestry and Forest Harvesting was established in 1923, and is currently headed by S.A. Korotkov, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor. The department is basic.

Directions of preparation:

250100.62 Forestry

250201.65 Forestry

250100.68 Forestry. Program master's degree: Silviculture, forestry and forest pyrology.
The list of those planned for reading at the department in 2013/2014 academic year. year of disciplines.

1. Introduction to the specialty (250100.62).

2. Forest science (250100.62).

3. Forest pyrology (250100.62).

4. Forestry (250100.62

5. Tapping of the forest (250100.62).

6. Forestry (080100.62).

7. Fundamentals of forest science (250700.62).

8. Fundamentals of forestry (051000.62).

9. Forest and commercial species of the world (051000.62).

10. Forestry (250400.62).

2. Personnel of the department
Currently, the department has 11 employees:

1. 
   Korotkov Sergey Alexandrovich - head. department, Ph.D. PhD, Associate Professor
2. 
   Obydennikov Viktor Ivanovich - Doctor of Agricultural Sciences n., professor
3. 
   Lomov Viktor Dmitrievich - Deputy. head department, Ph.D. n., professor
4. 
   Sergeeva Elena Petrovna - Ph.D. n., professor
5. 
   Nikitin Fedor Alexandrovich - Candidate of Agricultural Sciences n., professor
6. 
   Titov Alexey Pavlovich - Associate Professor
7. 
   Melnik Petr Grigorievich - Ph.D. PhD, Associate Professor
8. 
   Volkov Sergey Nikolaevich - Ph.D. PhD, Associate Professor
9. 
   Ivanov Sergey Konstantinovich - assistant
10. 
    Blazhenkov Mikhail Sergeevich - technician of the 1st category
11. 
    Eliseeva Daria Sergeevna - technician of the 1st category

Prof. Obydennikov V.I. is the deputy Chairman of the section "Forestry and reforestation" of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences (RAAS) and member of the section "Forestry" of the Problem Council on Forests of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS).

Members of the section "Forestry and reforestation" of the RAAS are professors V.D. Lomov, F.A. Nikitin, E.P. Sergeyev.

At the Forestry Program Council Russian Academy works: prof. Obydennikov V.I., prof. Lomov V.D., Associate Professor Melnik P.G.

Prof. Obydennikov V.I. member of the scientific and methodological council in the specialty 250201 "Forestry" for education in the field of forestry.

Prof. Lomov V.D. - Chairman of the Methodological Council, specialty 250201 "Forestry", member of the Methodological Commission of the specialty 260100 "Forest Engineering".
2.1. Information about the teaching staff
Data on the teachers of the department are given in table 2.1.1.

Distribution of load on the department in the current academic year given in table 2.1.2.

Data on the advanced training of the teaching staff of the department (place and timing of advanced training for each teacher over the past 3 years) in accordance with the data of the FPKP are given in table 2.1.3.
Table 2.1.1

Information about the teachers of the department

6. "Introduction to Literary Studies"

7. "Modern technologies in the process of teaching linguistic disciplines"

8. "History of foreign literature"

9. "Children's literature with a workshop on expressive reading"

eleven. " Elective courses literature"

12. "Modern technologies in the process of teaching literary disciplines"

13. "Technology of teaching methods Russian language and Literature"

14. "Modern Russian language"

15. "Russian language"

16. "Methods of teaching the Russian language"

17. "Literature"

18. "Literature of the peoples of the NC"

19. "Russian literature"

20. "Literary criticism"

21. "Artistic methods and literary trends in Russian and foreign literature"

22. "Modern Literature of the NSC"

23. "Russian Literature"

24. "Modern Literature of the NSC"

25. "Calligraphy"

26. "Folklore"

27. "Philological analysis of the text"

28. "Propaedeutic course of the modern Russian language"

29. "Workshop on the Russian language"

30. "History of national literature"

31. "Linguistics"

32. "Children's literature with a workshop on expressive reading"

33. "Speech communication"

34. "Theory of language"

35. "Modern Russian language"

36. "Styling"

37. Language Practice

38. "Russian dialectology"

39. "Workshop on expressive reading"

40. "History of the Russian language"

42. "Foreign language"

2. Educational and methodical work

Taking into account modern requirements for the organization of training, control, self-control of knowledge, skills and abilities of students, teachers of the department developed educational and methodological complexes in the disciplines of the department for 7-8 semesters. Issues of developing the teaching materials were discussed at the October and December meetings (minutes No. 3, No. 5, respectively, 2011). In December 2011, the staff of the department provided reports with preliminary information on the progress of the preparation of teaching materials. The final versions of the teaching materials, taking into account the comments made during the test, were provided by all the staff of the department at the end January 2012 of the year. The result of the department's activity is a set of teaching materials for the direction 050300.62 Philological education with specialized training "Russian language and literature" developed by the department in the academic year in accordance with the recommendations of the teaching materials department of the SBEI VPO SSPI branch in Zheleznovodsk. The data are presented in table 2.

table 2

Educational and methodical complexes

The remaining teaching materials and programs in all disciplines of the Department of Philology (VPO, SPO) were revised by the leading teachers: the thematic plans were corrected in accordance with the curricula, the content of the sections of the discipline in accordance with the requirements of the State educational standard, the list of basic and additional literature was updated, intra-semester questions were corrected, intermediate certification, the codifiers of attestation pedagogical measuring materials have been corrected.

The teachers of the department developed 72 annotations for 1-5 courses, 8 programs (“Foreign Language”, “Introduction to Linguistics”, “History of Foreign Literature”, “Introduction to Literary Studies”, “Folklore”, “Modern Russian Language”, “History Russian Literature", "Russian Language and Culture of Speech") for the 1st course in philological disciplines for directions 050100.62 Teacher Education with profile training "Russian language" and "Literature", 050400.62 Psychological and pedagogical education with profile training "Psychology and social pedagogy”, in connection with the transition to third-generation standards and 3 programs (“Foreign language”, G, “Russian language”, “Literature” for the specialty 050146 Teaching in primary school.

According to the schedule educational process Branch of GBOU VPO SSPI in Zheleznovodsk, official order for educational and methodological management dated., “On the preparation of documentation for conducting intermediate certification and the organized end of the winter semester of the academic year at the Branch of the State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education of the State Pedagogical Institute in Zheleznovodsk "in the disciplines of the Department of Philology, control and measuring materials were corrected and again compiled. 17 exams were held, 21 tests and students of the B1r group were protected term papers.

The results of the exams for the winter semester showed 100% progress in the disciplines of the department at the Faculty of Psychology and Education (the level of secondary vocational and higher education), and 96.2% Faculty of Humanities(HPE level).

The average academic performance in the Department of Philology decreased by 3.8% compared to the winter semester of the academic year (a student of the B1r group - , received unsatisfactory marks in the three disciplines indicated above. , could not liquidate academic debt in the terms established by the dean's office, as a result, she was expelled (Ex. 03c of 01.01.2001).

The quality of knowledge was 77.9% - at the Faculty of Humanities (HPE level), at the Faculty of Psychology and Education - 91.3% (HPE level), 74.0%. (SPO level). The average indicator of the quality of knowledge in the department increased by 3% (HPE level) Faculty of Humanities, Psychological and Pedagogical Faculty, the level of SVE increased by 15%.

The average score in the Department of Philology was 4.1 - at the Faculty of Humanities (HPE level), 4.1, at the Faculty of Psychology and Education (HPE level) 3.6 (SVE level). Analyzing the data, we see an increase in the average score compared to the academic year (the Faculty of Humanities (HPE level) - 4.0, the Psychological and Pedagogical Faculty (HPE level) - 3.9, (SVE level) - 3.4), the reason is that students in the exams of the academic year showed a higher level of knowledge of the material in the disciplines within the programs.

Based on the results obtained during the examinations, the following conclusions can be drawn:

Faculty of Humanities

1. All students of the B1r group successfully passed the exam in the discipline "Introduction to Literary Studies" (teacher). During the exam, students showed their knowledge of theoretical provisions, terms in the field of literary criticism, the ability to confirm statements with examples from literary works(performance 100%, quality of knowledge 80.8%, average score 4.3). The best answers are the answers - The answers of these students showed a deep knowledge of theoretical issues and the ability to compare, analyze, illustrate. In comparison with the intra-semester certification, the quality of knowledge has increased, the students of the group also showed the ability to analyze a work of art from different positions (composition, plot, genre, originality of the language).

The students of the B1r group who passed the exam in the discipline "History of Foreign Literature" (teacher) showed a deep knowledge of the main sections and topics of ancient literature, the ability to analyze a literary text, to see its originality, to determine the influence of ancient literature on the development of the further literary process (100%, quality of knowledge 80.8%, average score 4.2). The answers of the following students deserve special attention. In comparison with intra-semester certification, the quality of knowledge has increased, most students showed excellent mastery of the skills of comparison, analysis, synthesis, knowledge of basic terms. The teacher is recommended to continue work on developing the skills of analyzing a literary text, developing the monologue speech of students.

Group B1r students passed the exam in the discipline "Folklore" (teacher), (progress 96.2%, quality of knowledge 69.2%, average score 3.9). The answers of the students were complete, they differed in depth and content, in the formulation of reasoned conclusions. Most students demonstrated a high level of knowledge about folklore, its difference from other types of humanitarian knowledge. The best answers - In their answers, these students relied on samples of epic prose and poetry, not only the content, but also the level of speech culture distinguishes the answers of these students, but the quality of knowledge has decreased compared to intra-semester certification, because the student received an unsatisfactory mark. The lack of a system in teaching, motivation and a low level of cognitive independence did not allow the student to receive a positive assessment of her knowledge. has a very poor command of the content, shows a low level of speech culture, does not have a sufficient knowledge base on the material of a general education school, and finds it difficult to logically build an answer to a question. The teacher is recommended to form in students the skill of independent work, the ability to use scientific and reference literature.

Group B1r students passed the exam in the discipline "Modern Russian Language" (teacher B), (progress 96.2%, quality of knowledge 61.5%, average score 3.9). The exam showed that the students learned the material on the discipline. The main difficulties were caused by the insufficiency of learning the Russian language school curriculum. In this regard, practical tasks caused difficulties for students. Best Answers - Students' answers contained examples and terminology on ticket questions. answered questions about tickets uncertainly. They gave vague definitions.

25 out of 26 students of the B1r group passed the exam in the discipline "History of Russian Literature" (teacher), (progress 96.2%, quality of knowledge 61.5%, average score 3.9). The main difficulties were caused by the need to read some texts on Old Russian and their understanding. The best answers - these students gave logically accurate, balanced answers that fully reveal the essence of the questions. answered weakly, confused in terminology. could not give answers to the questions of the ticket, leading questions did not help the student, which led to an unsatisfactory result.

2. Students of group B2p passed exams in the discipline "Russian Literature and Culture" (teacher) (100% progress, knowledge quality 88.4%, average score 4.1.) The main material of the discipline was studied by second-year students successfully. The students coped with the tasks assigned to them. The best answers - Egozhva E, fully and logically answered the questions posed, accompanied the answer with relevant examples and additional information. showed insufficient preparation for the exam, poor knowledge of terminology. In this regard, the teacher is recommended to pay more attention to the preparation of additional information on the course material, self-training students.

3. All students of the B3r group passed the exam in the discipline "Technologies and Methods of Teaching the Russian Language and Literature" (teacher), (100% progress, 93.8% quality of knowledge, average score 4.3). The exam showed that students generally well mastered the theoretical material in the first section "Technologies and Methods of Teaching the Russian Language", are able to use the program, textbooks for secondary schools, can express their own point of view, give practical examples based on textbooks and experience gained in the classroom . The answers were considered the best.

4. Students of group B4r passed the exam in the discipline "Modern technologies in the process of teaching linguistic disciplines" with "excellent" and "good" (teacher), (100% progress, 100% quality of knowledge, average score 4.5). The students of the group showed knowledge of modern technologies and the skills to apply them in practice. Theoretical positions during the answers were illustrated with examples from their own activities. showed a high level of knowledge of theoretical and practical material, could present different points of view on the problem and comment based on scientific sources, as well as prove the effectiveness of the technology under consideration. In comparison with intra-semester certification, the quality of knowledge has increased, students have refracted the previously known theoretical positions in the light of teaching linguistic disciplines.

All students of the B4r group passed the exam in the discipline "Modern Russian Language" (teacher), (100% progress, knowledge quality 92.8%, average score 4.4.). In the answers, the theoretical provisions were supported by practical examples, the answers were logically constructed, the speech corresponded to the norms literary language. Student answers are the best. Compared to the previous academic year, there is a dynamic improvement in the quality of knowledge. Since the discipline is submitted to the final state interdisciplinary exam for the teacher, it is necessary to develop a system for repeating previously studied material.

The students of group B4p passed the exam with "excellent" and "good" in the discipline "History of the Russian language" (teacher), (100% progress, 100% quality of knowledge, average score 4.6.) In general, the discipline was studied successfully. Students studied the material completing this course. Successfully cited examples and features relating to the main aspects of the study of the history of the Russian language. Difficulties were mainly caused by special cases of use and peculiarities of historical changes in the Russian language. The best answers - gave exhaustive, complete answers. The quality of students' knowledge has improved compared to the last academic year, as increased attention was paid to the study of the main topics of the course practical application acquired knowledge.

5. All students of group B4d passed the exam in the discipline "Linguistics" (teacher), (100% progress, knowledge quality 68.8%, average score 3.9.). During the exam, students showed an average and high level of knowledge of the discipline, possession of additional material. The main difficulty is the insufficiently deep study of some topics of the course by students and their practical application. The best answers - showed knowledge of the terms and concepts of the discipline, confidently and logically built their answers. did not fully disclose the issues of the ticket. It was difficult to use terms and concepts.

Faculty of Psychology and Education (HPE level)

1. Students of the B1p group passed the exam in the discipline "Russian language and culture of speech" (teacher I), (100% progress, 83% quality of knowledge, average score 3.9). Students basically mastered the concepts of language and speech, the basic norms of the literary language and the qualities of good literary speech, the text and its structure, the functional styles of the literary language, demonstrated the ability to distinguish between elements of normalized and non-standardized speech, find and eliminate speech errors and speech shortcomings, which was determined practical task. these students fully answered the theoretical questions and accurately completed the practical tasks. The responses were weak. Students did not cope with the definition of norms in the formulation of stress and the elimination of speech errors. Based on the above, to recommend to the teacher to pay more attention to the repetition of basic knowledge from the course high school In Russian. To form research skills of students in the discipline.

2. All students of the B3n group successfully passed the exam in the discipline "Theoretical Foundations and Technologies of Primary Literary Education" (teacher A), (100% progress, 100% quality of knowledge, average score 4.3). Students showed knowledge theoretical foundations and technologies of primary literary education. The provisions of the theory were confirmed by examples from practice: they illustrated the answers with fragments of lessons. students showed fluency in theoretical material, the ability to analyze and compare different points of view on the problem, showed the ability to draw reasonable conclusions, confirm their answers with illustrations from practical experience. In comparison with intra-semester certification, the quality of knowledge has increased, students have broken the previously known theoretical positions in the light of the analysis of lesson fragments, planning actions for a particular lesson.

(SPO level)

1. All students of group 1-1n, 1-2n passed the exam in the discipline "Russian language" (assistant), (progress 100%, quality of knowledge 96.2%, average score 4.2), (progress 100%, quality of knowledge 60.0%, average score 3.7) respectively.

The exam was held in the form of a dictation. As a result, students showed good command spelling and punctuation skills in the topics covered. In comparison with the entrance control, many students improved the quality of knowledge.

Thus, the analysis of the results of the assessment of students' knowledge showed that the majority of students coped with the proposed practical tasks as "good" and "excellent". Students showed high and average levels of knowledge of theoretical material in the framework of programs developed for the humanitarian and psychological and pedagogical faculties.

Students whose answers were rated "satisfactory" showed a weak level of knowledge of the disciplines of the department in the framework of the programs, insufficient skills development.

The reasons for the low academic performance of students were identified:

§ poor initial training in the Russian language;

§ below average ability to logically correctly build oral and written speech;

§ insufficient use of public speaking skills;

§ lack of ability to work independently;

§ performance of tasks at a low level.

Offers:

1) The teachers of the department continue to conduct a course of correction, support and improvement of communication skills achieved in the main school, providing speech practice of the receptive (reading) and productive (speaking, writing) plan, as well as updating and systematizing language, speech and socio-cultural knowledge, skills and skills (for first-year students).

2) Strengthen control over the preparation of group students, especially 3rd and 4th year students 050300.62 Philological education with specialized training "Russian language and literature" in order to systematically prepare for the upcoming final state exam.

3) Ensure that the teachers of the department conduct individual consultations for students who have shown a low level of knowledge based on the results of the entrance control.

4) To carry out a systematic control of students' knowledge (using APIMs), to conduct a comparative analysis of the progress and quality of students' knowledge in the disciplines of the department.

5) Timely inform the deans, deputy deans of faculties about student absences from classes and the reasons for poor academic performance. Dean's office to monitor attendance and work off missed classes.

2. Research work of teachers

The research work of the teachers of the department includes:

· improving the scientific qualifications of teachers;

study, analysis various kinds scientific teaching materials;

preparation and discussion teaching aids and recommendations

During the reporting period, the teachers of the department wrote the following articles:

"Complex text analysis as a means of forming the communicative competence of students" (, Center for Scientific Thought of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference "Linguistics in the Modern World" December 30th 2011 Taganrog).

“The specificity of pronominal-substantive combinations as syntactic names and their functioning in a literary text (on the material of prose). (To the Center for Scientific Thought of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference "Linguistics in the Modern World" on December 30, 2011, Taganrog).

"The Role of Teaching in Public Service". (, Eighth international scientific-practical conference "Pedagogical education and teaching in the context of reforms modern Russia, Mission, Historical Lessons and Effectiveness Factors” December 2011 SGPI Stavropol).

"Different artistic interpretation of the figurative symbolism of poetic texts in the novels of I. Novikov and V. Grossman" (, Scientific and Innovation Center. Scientific and Practical Conference "Modern Research social problems» November 2011 Krasnoyarsk.)

"On pedagogical technique" (Reshetnikova of general pedagogy, history of pedagogy and education).

Textbooks "Russian language" were published. Collection of exercises for 10th grade. Collection of exercises for 11th grade. Publishing house "Academy", Moscow. , Org,

As part of the informatization week, the Associate Professor held a Master class. Literary monument "The Tale of Igor's Campaign".

Update professional knowledge teachers was carried out in the form of intra-department methodological seminars, as well as in the form of participation in external events. During the reporting period of the department's work, in accordance with the decisions made at the meetings of the department, 2 methodological seminars were held, "Modern technologies in the process of teaching philological disciplines" (,). "Extracurricular work as a means of increasing motivation for the study of philological disciplines" (). The main attention at the methodical seminars was given to new interactive methods, the use of multimedia teaching aids.

Research work of students

Research work of students is an important means of improving the quality of training and education of specialists who are able to creatively apply the achievements of scientific, pedagogical and cultural progress in practical activities. Attracting students to scientific work makes it possible to use their creative and labor potential to solve urgent problems of the development of society.

NIRS is a continuation and deepening of the educational process and is organized directly at the department.

The Department of Philology is working to ensure the research work of students through the organization of problem groups, clubs.

Since 2009, the problem group “Literature of Peoples” has been working Stavropol Territory”, which deals with the consideration of the artistic originality of the literature of the peoples living on the territory of the Stavropol Territory, namely the image of the life of the peoples of the North Caucasus. During the reporting period, the students of the group visited the house-museum, the museum of local lore in Pyatigorsk, Zheleznovodsk. During the classes, students, under the guidance of a teacher, explore the processes of formation and development of the literature of the peoples living on the territory of the Stavropol Territory.

Main focus in scientific research student scientific society"Epistolaria", according to calendar plan, was given to staging Problems research: speech portrait of a modern linguistic personality, and tasks research:

1. To reveal the concept and content of the theoretical aspects of the linguistic personality

2. To study the relationship between the concepts of "linguistic personality" and "speech portrait".

3. To analyze the speech and linguistic training of students of Russian universities

4. Consider the mechanisms for improving communicative activities in the professional orientation of a student

5. Develop a training program for an integrated approach to teaching speech communication of a modern linguistic personality. The meetings of the problem group were held according to the plan, the following issues were discussed:

Determination of a person's linguistic self-awareness as a measurement of social models of speech behavior.

Concepts of time and space in the formation of a student's linguistic personality.

Linguistic personality of a modern student.

During the winter semester, the theoretical materials necessary for the study were selected, collected and analyzed by the participants of the problem group.

At this time, the group under the guidance of an associate professor is actively working on the design of the theoretical material of the study.

Thus, students of problem groups master the scientific method of cognition and, on its basis, in-depth and creative development of educational material, acquire skills in working in scientific collectives master the methods and means independent solution scientific and pedagogical tasks. Students of the Faculty of Philology, members of the literary club "Sail" under the guidance of an associate professor, organized and held round table, dedicated to the bicentenary of the opening of the Imperial Tsarskoye Selo Lyceum "... Our Fatherland is Tsarskoye Selo".

And they also participated in the scientific-practical conference “- a genius towering over his era” (Shevtsov Yu made presentations).

Students of philological groups took part in a student conference organized by the SSPI and presented articles in the field of the Russian language and literature. ("Philosophical aspect of creativity" - leader), ("Comparative analysis syntagmatic and Paradigmatic Relations in Vocabulary” – leader), (“Historical and poetic stylization as a subject of linguo-stylistic research”

Supervisor).

4. Prospects for the work of the department

1. Improvement curricula on the disciplines of the department in accordance with the requirements of the federal state standard, adjustment of curricula in connection with changes in the State Educational Standards and curricula, according to which students are trained;

2. Improvement of educational documentation in the main areas;

3. Development of texts of lecture courses, topics of seminars and practical classes, recommendations for independent work of students;

4. Correction of programs for state exams; preparation of reference and didactic materials for state exams Preparation for printing of scientific, methodological and educational materials to ensure the educational process;

5. Participation in scientific conferences, presentations, writing articles and abstracts;

6. Involving students in research work.

Head department of st. teacher

1. Report of the senior teacher of the Department of TPH and PPR S. V. Lykov on scientific and pedagogical work for the 2006-2007 academic year.

1. Academic work

The annual load is 900 hours. 100% completion in each academic year.

In the 2006-2007 academic year, lectures were given on the following courses "Programming of crops", "Fundamentals of Computerization" for full-time and part-time students; "Programming and Forecasting Harvests" for undergraduates.

Lectures were read in accordance with the program. Laboratory-practical and seminar classes were held. Based on the results of the study of the discipline - an exam. 5-6 written examinations were carried out, regular control and assessment of knowledge was carried out throughout the semester.

Progress-92-93%. Examinations were held in writing, students' answers were evaluated by 2 teachers.

During the reporting period, 4 theses were prepared. In accordance with the schedule of the educational and methodological department on September 28, 2006, an open lecture was held, which was read to 4th year students of the faculty of TPH and PPR on the topic "Principles of programming crop yields, approaches and methods." The lecture was positively evaluated. 25.04.07. the second open lecture was held, which was read to undergraduate students of the faculty of TPH and PPR on the topic "The role of modern technologies in the formation of agrophytocenosis and achieving its maximum productivity." The lecture was positively evaluated.

2 . Scientific and methodological work included:

a) production of stands according to the technology of cultivation of winter barley - 25 hours

b) preparation of examination tickets - 4 sets, updated annually

c) preparation for lectures and laboratory and practical classes

d) regular mutual attendance of classes by order of the educational and methodological department with writing reviews on open classes.

e) updated work programs for disciplines. Was developed for the first time working programm on the course "Adaptive crop production" and "Agrobiological control in crop production" for the faculty of TPH and PPR.

3. Scientific work .

1. Was the executor of the state budget research topic under section 6.7.1.

2. He was the executor of the economic contract theme for Partizan OJSC

3. Prepared a full report on R&D.

4. Prepared 4 student reports for a student scientific conference and 1 report for a rally of excellent students.

5. Prepared and successfully defended a dissertation for the degree of candidate of agricultural sciences in the specialty 06.01.09 - crop production on the topic "Ways to adapt the elements of technology for the cultivation of winter barley in the foothills of the Crimea", which is currently under examination at the Higher Attestation Commission of Ukraine.

6. 3 printed scientific and scientific-methodical works were published (from the general list -35.

7. Prepared and published in newspapers 5 articles on the results of research and in the form of recommendations for the cultivation of winter crops in the Crimea.

4. Work on the implementation of research results into production.

1. Work in the ICC - 42 hours (participation in district meetings and seminars, providing advisory assistance to farms).

2. Production workshops - 45 hours spent

5. Cultural and educational work.

The work was carried out during lectures, in laboratory and practical classes, during learning practices with students in readable disciplines.

He was the curator of the student group 21.1, regularly performed the duties of a curator in accordance with the approved plan, took part in regular seminar mentors of student groups.

The report was prepared by a senior lecturer of the Department of TPH and PPR, candidate of agricultural sciences. Sciences S. V. Lykov July 5, 2007.

2. REPORT of the Associate Professor of the Department of TPHiPPOiS SF NUBiP of Ukraine "KATU" Reznik N. G. for the period from March 16, 2004 to March 6, 2009.

Educational, educational-methodical, research and educational work in the reporting period was carried out in accordance with the general plan of the department. In preparation for the classes, constant attention was paid to the improvement of educational and methodological work in order to improve the quality of training specialists for agricultural production.

1. Study work

The volume and content of educational work was determined by the plan approved by the department. Classes (lectures and LPZ) were held in the first, third and fourth years of full-time and part-time departments of the Faculty of Economics and Management, Accounting, Finance and Forestry, Landscape Gardening and Hunting, Agronomy; the third, fourth and fifth courses of the full-time and part-time department of the Faculty of TPH&PP&V. The teaching load for the reporting period was 900 hours annually.

2. Educational and methodical work

Educational and methodological work was carried out in the direction of improving the teaching of the disciplines "Vegetable growing", "Programming the harvest of vegetable crops", "Standardization and product quality management" and "Potato growing". To conduct classes and practices at the above courses of full-time and part-time departments of the faculties of economics and management, accounting, finance, agronomy, horticulture and viticulture, forestry, gardening and hunting, the UMKD was developed.

The list of published scientific articles and guidelines is given in the list of scientific papers.

3. Research work

Research work was carried out on state budget topics in accordance with the departmental plan on the topic: "Development of technology for growing early potatoes" on the basis of the Law Firm NUBiP of Ukraine "KATU". Since January 2007, I have been in charge of research work on the state budget contract with NUBiP of Ukraine No. 110/238-pr. on the topic: "To develop a technology for growing early potatoes in the southern zone of Ukraine."

4. Educational work

Educational work with students was aimed at shaping the future specialists of the agro-industrial complex of the need for work, patriotic and professional pride in the work of the farmer and specialist Agriculture. In 2004 - 2006 was the curator of the student group for 1 - 2 courses until it was disbanded and merged with other groups. Currently, I am the curator of a student group in the first year of the faculty of the TEC&PPPV.

This work was carried out taking into account the individual qualities of students during training sessions, in the hostel, as well as in all cases of communication with students (educational, educational and industrial practice, etc.).

3. Report on the scientific and pedagogical work of the associate professor of the department of winemaking and fermentation technology Ivanchenko Konstantin Vyacheslavovich for the 2008-2009 academic year Simferopol, 2010

1. EDUCATIONAL WORK.

For the period from September 1, 2008 to July 12, 2009, I conducted lectures and laboratory-practical classes at the Faculty of Technology in the discipline: "Technology of beer and soft drinks", "Technology of alcohol and alcoholic beverage production", "Technological quality of raw materials alcoholic beverage production”, “Features of research in winemaking”.

This academic year, course and diploma projects, technological practices in the 2nd and 3rd years, and independent work of students at the Faculty of Technology were supervised.

The total workload for the 2008-2009 academic year was 900 hours, of which 900 hours were actually completed.

Of this load in the current academic year, 120 hours accounted for lectures (13.3%) and 252 hours (28.0%) for laboratory and practical and seminar classes. The volume of diploma design management was 165 hours, or 18.3% of the total workload. The practice load was: 187 hours or 20.8%.

2. METHODOLOGICAL WORK

In order to further improve the level of teaching the disciplines "Technological quality of the raw materials of the alcoholic beverage production", "Features of research in winemaking" for students studying full-time and part-time forms of study at the "Master" educational institution, methodological guidelines for laboratory and practical classes were developed.

Prepared tests on the discipline "Technological quality of raw materials of alcoholic beverage production."

3. RESEARCH WORK

In the 2008-2009 academic year, research work continued. On the completed topic, an article was published in the collection of the University, another article is in print.

4. PUBLIC WORK

I am the curator of group 5 TBP. Twice a month, within the curatorial hour, he held thematic talks on science, technology, ecology, as well as on moral and ethical topics. In accordance with the schedule of the faculty, he was on duty in the hostel, and also attended sports events (competitions), where students of the 5TBP group participated.

Associate Professor of the Department of Winemaking and TBP K. V. Ivanchenko. Head Department of E. P. Scholz-Kulikov

4. REPORT OF THE TEACHER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES A. V. PSHENKO FOR THE 2008/2009 ACADEMIC YEAR

900 hours planned. 900 hours actually completed

Classes were held with full-time students of the 1st and 2nd year of the Faculty of Mechanics, the Faculty of TEC&PPR, the Faculty of Accounting and Finance, the 1st year of the Faculty of Economics and Management, the 2nd year of the Faculty of Medical and Public Health, the 1st year of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, as well as in groups with in-depth study of a foreign language (specialization ) 1st year accounting and finance faculty and 2nd year faculty of economics and management. In addition, classes were held with 1st and 2nd year students of correspondence courses of the Faculty of Mechanics, as well as the Faculty of LSP&OH.

2. Educational and methodical work

During the 2008/09 academic year, preparation for practical classes was carried out according to the curriculum (13 groups).

Revised and updated learning programs by discipline " English language» for 1st and 2nd year students of the Faculty of Mechanics. Individual tasks were developed for independent work in the discipline "English" for 2nd year students of all faculties and specialties.

At the end of the 1st and 2nd semesters, module tests were checked - 80 hours.

3. Scientific and methodological work

Over the past period, the following methodological developments have been prepared and published:

1) Methodological development on conversational topics (German) for 1-2 year students of all faculties and specialties.

Preparation for practical classes was carried out both with the help of methodological materials available in the funds of the university, and by attracting the latest manuals and developments. In addition, in preparing for the classes, new experience was used, obtained when visiting open classes of teachers of the department (Chernyshova M.V. and other teachers).

4. Scientific work

In 2008/09 academic year scientific work conducted in the following areas:

Participation in conferences:

1) methodological conference of the Law Firm KATU NAU (December 2008). A report was prepared on the topic “Training independent work with terminology"

2) conference of the labor collective (February 2009)

3) conference dedicated to the Day of Science (May 2009). A report was prepared on the topic "Working with terminology in teaching a foreign language."

Participation in the development of the general scientific theme of the department.

5. Educational work

In the 2008/09 academic year, educational work was carried out in the following areas:

1) Carrying out organizational and educational activities;

2) Organization and conduct of excursions, visits to exhibitions, concerts and other cultural and educational events;

3) Preparation, organization and holding of a competition of translators dedicated to the 65th anniversary of the liberation of Crimea among 1st year students;

4) Career guidance work with high school students in Simferopol (November 2008)

5) Departure for field practice with 2nd year students of the Faculty of Accounting and Finance (September 2008)